The use of holistic certification tools is increasing and requirements in legislation are continuously being tightened. This calls for a holistic simulation approach in the early design phase where input uncertainties are large and decisions are crucial to the performance. An iterative parametric method is proposed: 1) Assign uniform distributions to uncertain design inputs of interest; 2) Perform sensitivity analysis (SA) by the method of Morris to rank input by relative importance; 3) Run Monte Carlo simulations to explore the entire design domain; 4) Apply Monte Carlo filtering to identify preferable input domains for the most influential parameters. To enable computationally fast simulations, we combined calculations of energy demand and thermal comfort based on ISO 13790 (CEN 2008) with a regression model for daylight factor. We constructed scoring functions for the three outputs and applied weighting to combine the three scores into a single holistic score ranging from 0 to 100. The method was tested on a simple office building. An initial run of 3000 simulations was performed using a Quasi-Random LpTau sampling strategy for 22 variable inputs. A filter was applied to the holistic score to collect the 10 % best performing simulations. From this collection, histograms were used to identify favourable and adverse input spans for a selection of the most sensitive parameters. Subsequently, two runs of each 3000 simulations were performed – one using the favourable input spans and the other using the adverse spans. The results showed that the distribution related to favourable input spans was shifted significantly towards higher holistic scores. The authors conclude that the use of a stochastic, holistic method can guide decision-making by identifying favourable input regions, and thereby increase the remaining solution space and overall building performance.
[1]
Wei Tian,et al.
A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis
,
2013
.
[2]
Christian Struck,et al.
On the Application of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis with Abstract Building Performance Simulation Tools
,
2009
.
[3]
Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.
Uncertainty analysis in building performance simulation for design support
,
2011
.
[4]
Saltelli Andrea,et al.
Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer
,
2008
.
[5]
Svend Svendsen,et al.
Simulation-based support for integrated design of new low-energy office buildings
,
2011
.
[6]
Henrik Brohus,et al.
Overall evaluation of indoor climate and energy for alternative office designs using the eco‐factor
,
2004
.
[7]
Henrik Brohus,et al.
Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings
,
2009
.
[8]
Godfried Augenbroe,et al.
Analysis of uncertainty in building design evaluations and its implications
,
2002
.
[9]
Max D. Morris,et al.
Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments
,
1991
.
[10]
Koray Korkmaz,et al.
An approach for developing sensitive design parameter guidelines to reduce the energy requirements of low-rise apartment buildings
,
2012
.
[11]
I. M. Sobol,et al.
Random and quasirandom sequences: Numerical estimates of uniformity of distribution
,
1993
.