How Do IT Users’ Attributes Influence Innovative Use of IT: The Mediating Role of Individual Absorptive Capacity

Individual innovation is increasingly considered as a crucial element of organizational innovation. Prior research on user attributes as antecedents of innovation behavior (e.g., innovative use of IT) has identified three key factors: domain-specific knowledge and skills (e.g., prior knowledge), creativity-related skills (e.g., absorptive capacity), and intrinsic motivation. However, it is still unclear how these factors jointly impact the innovative use of IT. To address this knowledge gap, we propose a model that builds on the absorptive capacity theory and creativity literature to study how individuals’ innovative use of IT is influenced by prior knowledge, absorptive capacity, and intrinsic motivation as well as their joint interactions. Conceptualizing prior knowledge in two constructs (IT knowledge and domain knowledge) and absorptive capacity in four constructs (acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation), we empirically validate the proposed model with a survey of 249 business intelligence (BI) system users. In addition, we identify two mediating roles of absorptive capacity: indirect-only or complementary. The findings enhance our understanding of the innovative use of IT.

[1]  Hayoung Choi,et al.  Innovation Topic Analysis of Technology: The Case of Augmented Reality Patents , 2018, IEEE Access.

[2]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Impact of Transformational Leadership on System Exploration in the Mandatory Organizational Context , 2007, ICIS.

[3]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Inducing Intrinsic Motivation to Explore the Enterprise System: The Supremacy of Organizational Levers , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  R. Woodman,et al.  Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations , 2010 .

[5]  Feng Xia,et al.  A Hybrid Mechanism for Innovation Diffusion in Social Networks , 2016, IEEE Access.

[6]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[7]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[8]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[9]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Exploratory Usage of Enterprise Systems: The Joint Effects of Intrinsic Motivation and Psychological Empowerment , 2015, PACIS.

[10]  Dong Liu,et al.  From autonomy to creativity: a multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[12]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in R&D Project Teams: A Conceptualization and Empirical Test , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  John Campbell,et al.  Temporal Motivations of Volunteers to Participate in Cultural Crowdsourcing Work , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Chaelynne M. Wolak Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement , 2000 .

[15]  Y. Chiang,et al.  Core self-evaluation and workplace creativity , 2014 .

[16]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[17]  Claudia van Oppen,et al.  USING PLS PATH MODELING FOR ASSESSING HIERARCHICAL CONSTRUCT MODELS : GUIDELINES AND EMPIRICAL , 2022 .

[18]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement , 2010 .

[19]  Uta K. Bindl,et al.  Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation , 2010 .

[20]  J. George,et al.  When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice , 2001 .

[21]  Hua Ye,et al.  User Service Innovation on Mobile Phone Platforms: Investigating Impacts of Lead Userness, Toolkit Support, and Design Autonomy , 2018, MIS Q..

[22]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[23]  Wei Wang,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2022 .

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Rationality-Based Beliefs and Information Security Awareness , 2010, MIS Q..

[25]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[26]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Special Section Introduction - Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[28]  Rohit Aggarwal,et al.  Early to Adopt and Early to Discontinue: The Impact of Self-Perceived and Actual IT Knowledge on Technology Use Behaviors of End Users , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use , 2005, MIS Q..

[30]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[31]  C. Shalley,et al.  WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[32]  Jose Esteves,et al.  Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems ( MCIS ) 2012 EXAMINING THE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE IT INNOVATION PROCESS , 2017 .

[33]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Comparing Potential and Actual Innovators: An Empirical Study of Mobile Data Services Innovation , 2015, MIS Q..

[34]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[35]  Adedapo Oluwaseyi Ojo,et al.  The role of prior experience and goal orientation in individual absorptive capacity , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[36]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[37]  Annette Mills,et al.  Creative Use , 2011, PACIS.

[38]  R. Brislin Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[39]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Formal Theory of Creativity, Fun, and Intrinsic Motivation (1990–2010) , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[40]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  A Motivational Account for Post-Acceptance Routine and Innovative Use: Introducing the Concept of Tri-Dimensional Intrinsic Motivation , 2009, ICIS.

[41]  Wei Wang,et al.  The contingent effect of personal IT innovativeness and IT self-efficacy on innovative use of complex IT , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[42]  Adedapo Oluwaseyi Ojo,et al.  Microlevel antecedents of absorptive capacity in joint project engineering teams , 2017 .

[43]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[45]  Nicholas H. Roberts,et al.  Using Information Systems to Sense Opportunities for Innovation: Integrating Postadoptive Use Behaviors with the Dynamic Managerial Capability Perspective , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[47]  Heshan Sun,et al.  Dark Side of Personality and Innovation with IT , 2015, ECIS.

[48]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Personal information management effectiveness of knowledge workers: conceptual development and empirical validation , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Jeroen Kraaijenbrink,et al.  Antecedents and effects of individual absorptive capacity: a micro-foundational perspective on open innovation , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[50]  Yasser Rahrovani,et al.  Organizational Support for Innovative Use of IT: A Slack Resources Perspective , 2017, AMCIS.

[51]  Luning Liu,et al.  Innovation with IS usage: individual absorptive capacity as a mediator , 2014, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[52]  Euiho Suh,et al.  Determinants of Users’ Intention to Purchase Probability-Based Items in Mobile Social Network Games: A Case of South Korea , 2018, IEEE Access.

[53]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Michael Dinger,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research , 2012, MIS Q..

[55]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  Capturing the Complexity of Malleable IT Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory for Individuals , 2016, MIS Q..

[57]  Mei Cao,et al.  Exploring the absorptive capacity to innovation/productivity link for individual engineers engaged in IT enabled work , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Hee-Dong Yang,et al.  Perceived absorptive capacity of individual users in performance of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) usage: The case for Korean firms , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[59]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[60]  Ryan T. Wright,et al.  Mindfulness in Information Technology Use: Definitions, Distinctions, and a New Measure , 2018, MIS Q..

[61]  Minhyung Kang,et al.  Absorptive capacity, knowledge sharing, and innovative behaviour of R&D employees , 2017, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[62]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[63]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Learning from Experience in Software Development: A Multilevel Analysis , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[64]  C. Shalley,et al.  RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 2003 .

[65]  R. Morgan,et al.  Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth , 2007 .

[66]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[67]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Reconceptualizing Compatability Beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research , 2006, MIS Q..

[68]  Wei Wang,et al.  Factors Influencing Employees' Deep Usage of Information Systems , 2005, PACIS.

[69]  Xiaojun Zhang,et al.  Knowledge Management System Use and Job Performance: A Multilevel Contingency Model , 2017, MIS Q..

[70]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[71]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[72]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Gatekeepers' innovative use of IT: An absorptive capacity model at the unit level , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[73]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2015, MIS Q..

[74]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  User's Perceived IS Slack Resources and their Effects on Innovating with IT , 2014, ICIS.

[75]  Weiwei Lin,et al.  An Ensemble Random Forest Algorithm for Insurance Big Data Analysis , 2017, IEEE Access.

[76]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for Ideation: Individual-level Openness and Idea Generation in R&D , 2012 .

[77]  Yunjie Calvin Xu,et al.  Individual And Collective Innovative Use Of Enterprise System- Mediating Role Of Collective Learning , 2012, PACIS.

[78]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[79]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Reaping the benefits of innovative IT: the long and winding road , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[80]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[81]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective , 2009 .

[82]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[83]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: Theoretical bases and empirical validation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[84]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[85]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Employees’ Exploration of Complex Systems: An Integrative View , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[86]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[87]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[88]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[89]  Luning Liu,et al.  The Effect of Organizational Levers and the Mediating Role of Individual Absorptive Capacity in Information System Innovation , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[90]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation , 2013 .

[91]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Generalized Darwinism Perspective on Changes in Individuals' Use of Information Systems , 2014, ICIS.

[92]  Franz W. Kellermanns,et al.  The longitudinal impact of enterprise system users’ pre-adoption expectations and organizational support on post-adoption proficient usage , 2014, EJIS.

[93]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information Technology , 1999, MIS Q..

[94]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[95]  Nurul Indarti,et al.  A Conceptual Interaction Cycle Between Individual and Group Absorptive Capacity with Social Integration Mechanism and Cohesive Learning Group as Moderating Variables , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM).

[96]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[97]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Which Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Better Predicts the Chinese Stock Market? , 2018, IEEE Access.

[98]  Hossein Mohammadi,et al.  Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[99]  Prabuddha De,et al.  Learning Effects of Domain, Technology, and Customer Knowledge in Information Systems Development: An Empirical Study , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[100]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Relations among conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and procedural flexibility in two samples differing in prior knowledge. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[101]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.