Performance optimization and improvement of a flash-binary geothermal power plant using zeotropic mixtures with PSO algorithm

Abstract This paper presents a novel approach for optimizing and also improving a flash-binary geothermal power plant whose binary cycle is an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) which is using various combinations of zeotropic mixtures as working fluid. All of the obtained results are optimized with particle swarm optimization (PSO) method for maximum total output power which is the objective function of the problem. First, the optimization is performed in the certain amounts of mixtures’ mass fractions. Then, the optimal values for the mass fractions are found. The results indicate that Pentane containing combinations show better performances. For instance, when the ORC unit is using the mixture of Pentane(0.45)/Butane(0.55) the highest output power is gaining: 1376.87 (kW) from the ORC unit and 5726.44 (kW) from the whole system. Also, the highest improvements in utilization of zeotropic mixture instead of pure fluids are obtained by this mixture which are 18.769 (%) with respect to ORC's output power and 3.950 (%) with respect to total output power. Finally, an investigation on flash chamber pressure effect on the system performance is accomplished and the results reveal that with increasing the pressure, the total output power decreases. Although lower flash chamber pressure seems to be a suitable choice, the investigation on the size parameters (SP) of the turbines shows that it is better to choose a mean amount of pressure for the flash chamber, thereby having the affordable amounts for the size parameters and also obtaining an adequate amount of total output power.

[1]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Metaheuristics in water, geotechnical and transport engineering , 2012 .

[2]  I. Dincer Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review , 2000 .

[3]  Mortaza Yari,et al.  Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a marine engine waste heat driven RO desalination system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic working fluid. , 2017 .

[4]  Yajing Zhao,et al.  Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system , 2016 .

[5]  Gadhiraju Venkatarathnam,et al.  Occurrence of pinch points in condensers and evaporators for zeotropic refrigerant mixtures , 1996 .

[6]  Jovana Radulovic,et al.  On the potential of zeotropic mixtures in supercritical ORC powered by geothermal energy source , 2014 .

[7]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization , 2014 .

[8]  George Papadakis,et al.  Low­grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles - A review of various applications , 2011 .

[9]  Markus Preißinger,et al.  Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources , 2012 .

[10]  Steven Lecompte,et al.  Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery , 2015 .

[11]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems , 2013 .

[12]  Mortaza Yari,et al.  Comparative and parametric study of double flash and single flash/ORC combined cycles based on exergoeconomic criteria , 2015 .

[13]  Steven Lecompte,et al.  Exergy analysis of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic rankine cycles , 2014 .

[14]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Efficiency Prediction for Axial-Flow Turbines Operating with Nonconventional Fluids , 1981 .

[15]  Mortaza Yari,et al.  Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants , 2010 .

[16]  A. Abusoglu,et al.  Exergetic cost evaluation of hydrogen production powered by combined flash-binary geothermal power plant , 2015 .

[17]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  Thermodynamic and economic analysis and optimization of power cycles for a medium temperature geothermal resource , 2014 .

[18]  Mehdi Zeyghami,et al.  Performance analysis and binary working fluid selection of combined flash-binary geothermal cycle , 2015 .

[19]  F. Mohammadkhani,et al.  Thermodynamic and economic performance improvement of ORCs through using zeotropic mixtures: Case of waste heat recovery in an offshore platform , 2016 .

[20]  Mortaza Yari,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures , 2016 .

[21]  Gequn Shu,et al.  Study of mixtures based on hydrocarbons used in ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) for engine waste heat recovery , 2014 .

[22]  Bruno Vanslambrouck,et al.  Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles , 2012 .

[23]  Mortaza Yari,et al.  A comparative thermodynamic analysis of ORC and Kalina cycles for waste heat recovery: A case study for CGAM cogeneration system , 2017 .

[24]  Jialing Zhu,et al.  Parametric optimization and performance analysis of zeotropic mixtures for an organic Rankine cycle driven by low-medium temperature geothermal fluids , 2015 .

[25]  G. Axelsson,et al.  Geothermal energy for sustainable development: A review of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks , 2015 .

[26]  M. McLinden,et al.  NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 8.0 , 2007 .

[27]  He Weifeng,et al.  Thermal matching performance of a geothermal ORC system using zeotropic working fluids , 2015 .

[28]  D. P. Sekulic,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design , 2003 .

[29]  Salman Ajib,et al.  Evaluation of mixtures performances in Organic Rankine Cycle when utilizing the geothermal water with and without cogeneration , 2015 .

[30]  Hao Liu,et al.  Performance analysis of regenerative organic Rankine cycle (RORC) using the pure working fluid and the zeotropic mixture over the whole operating range of a diesel engine , 2014 .

[31]  Ryuichi Itoi,et al.  Flash Cycle and Binary Geothermal Power Plant Optimization , 2012 .