Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry

HighlightsA large subset of observers experience imbalance between their two eyes.The stronger eye is dominant longer and more frequently during binocular rivalry.Large eye imbalance also predicts frequent return transitions to the dominant eye.Sighting and sensory eye dominance are unrelated. ABSTRACT Normal binocular vision emerges from the combination of neural signals arising within separate monocular pathways. It is natural to wonder whether both eyes contribute equally to the unified cyclopean impression we ordinarily experience. Binocular rivalry, which occurs when the inputs to the two eyes are markedly different, affords a useful means for quantifying the balance of influence exerted by the eyes (called sensory eye dominance, SED) and for relating that degree of balance to other aspects of binocular visual function. However, the precise ways in which binocular rivalry dynamics change when the eyes are unbalanced remain uncharted. Relying on widespread individual variability in the relative predominance of the two eyes as demonstrated in previous studies, we found that an observer’s overall tendency to see one eye more than the other was driven both by differences in the relative duration and frequency of instances of that eye’s perceptual dominance. Specifically, larger imbalances between the eyes were associated with longer and more frequent periods of exclusive dominance for the stronger eye. Increases in occurrences of dominant eye percepts were mediated in part by a tendency to experience “return transitions” to the predominant eye – that is, observers often experienced sequential exclusive percepts of the dominant eye’s image with an intervening mixed percept. Together, these results indicate that the often‐observed imbalances between the eyes during binocular rivalry reflect true differences in sensory processing, a finding that has implications for our understanding of the mechanisms underlying binocular vision in general.

[1]  Rui M. V. Abreu,et al.  1-Aryl-3-[4-(thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4-yloxy)phenyl]ureas as VEGFR-2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Molecular Modelling Studies , 2013, BioMed research international.

[2]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[3]  G. Alpers,et al.  Emotional pictures predominate in binocular rivalry , 2006 .

[4]  Walter H. Fink,et al.  THE DOMINANT EYE: ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE , 1938 .

[5]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Onset rivalry: the initial dominance phase is independent of ongoing perceptual alternations , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Awareness of Central Luminance Edge Is Crucial for the Craik-o'brien-cornsweet Effect , 2022 .

[7]  R. Blake,et al.  Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. , 2007, Emotion.

[8]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry , 2005, Vision Research.

[9]  E. Graf,et al.  On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry , 2009, Vision Research.

[10]  C. Paffen,et al.  Visual input signaling threat gains preferential access to awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm , 2016, Cognition.

[11]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Effectively Reducing Sensory Eye Dominance with a Push-Pull Perceptual Learning Protocol , 2010, Current Biology.

[12]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Push–pull training reduces foveal sensory eye dominance within the early visual channels , 2012, Vision Research.

[13]  Valeria Della-Maggiore,et al.  Functional Imaging Reveals Movement Preparatory Activity in the Vegetative State , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  R. Blake,et al.  Chronic and acute biases in perceptual stabilization. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[15]  C. Olivia,et al.  Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. , 2012 .

[16]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Deconstructing Interocular Suppression: Attention and Divisive Normalization , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  S Coren,et al.  Sighting Dominance and Binocular Rivalry , 1978, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[18]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  George Sperling,et al.  A gain-control theory of binocular combination. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Clifford.  Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[22]  Melissa L. Rice,et al.  Results of ocular dominance testing depend on assessment method. , 2008, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[23]  E. Birch,et al.  Infant interocular acuity differences and binocular vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[24]  Hiroshi Uozato,et al.  Effects of Dominant and Nondominant Eyes in Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  R. Blake.  A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[26]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Report Experience-Driven Plasticity in Binocular Vision , 2010 .

[27]  Tandra Ghose,et al.  Relative image size, not eye position, determines eye dominance switches , 2004, Vision Research.

[28]  G C DeAngelis,et al.  The physiology of stereopsis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  R. Blake,et al.  A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  David Alais,et al.  Multisensory Congruency as a Mechanism for Attentional Control over Perceptual Selection , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Heeger,et al.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[33]  Alexander Pastukhov,et al.  Cumulative history quantifies the role of neural adaptation in multistable perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[34]  J. González-Méijome,et al.  Ocular Dominance and Visual Function Testing , 2013, BioMed research international.

[35]  R. Blake,et al.  Normalization Regulates Competition for Visual Awareness , 2012, Neuron.

[36]  Tomas Knapen,et al.  GABA Shapes the Dynamics of Bistable Perception , 2013, Current Biology.

[37]  Patrick T. Goodbourn,et al.  A population study of binocular function , 2015, Vision Research.

[38]  Jack Alexander,et al.  Sensory ocular dominance based on resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity , 2009, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[39]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Sensory eye dominance. , 2001, Optometry.

[40]  J. Pointer,et al.  The absence of lateral congruency between sighting dominance and the eye with better visual acuity , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[41]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[42]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory , 2007, Vision Research.

[43]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry , 2022 .

[44]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[45]  G. Legge.  Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[46]  R. Blake,et al.  How Contrast Affects Stereoacuity , 1988, Perception.

[47]  W. Ehrenstein,et al.  Eye preference within the context of binocular functions , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[48]  D. Alais.  Binocular rivalry: competition and inhibition in visual perception. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[49]  Chris Donkin,et al.  Measuring Intuition , 2016, Psychological science.

[50]  D. Williams,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[51]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Staying focused: a functional account of perceptual suppression during binocular rivalry. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[52]  Matthew F. Tang,et al.  The broad orientation dependence of the motion streak aftereffect reveals interactions between form and motion neurons. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[53]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[54]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Understanding Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry: A Framework Based on Biased Competition , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[55]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  A binocular perimetry study of the causes and implications of sensory eye dominance , 2011, Vision Research.