Ex Vivo Assessment and Validation of Water Exchange Performance of 23 Heat and Moisture Exchangers for Laryngectomized Patients

BACKGROUND: Breathing through a tracheostoma results in insufficient warming and humidification of the inspired air. This loss of air conditioning, especially humidification, can be partially restored with the application of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) over the tracheostoma. For medical professionals, it is not easy to judge differences in water exchange performance of various HMEs owing to the lack of universal outcome measures. This study has three aims: assessment of the water exchange performance of commercially available HMEs for laryngectomized patients, validation of these results with absolute humidity outcomes, and assessment of the role of hygroscopic salt present in some of the tested HMEs. METHODS: Measurements of weight and absolute humidity at end inspiration and end expiration at different breathing volumes of a healthy volunteer were performed using a microbalance and humidity sensor. Twenty-three HMEs from 6 different manufacturers were tested. Associations were determined between core weight, weight change, breathing volume, and absolute humidity, using both linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Water exchange of the 23 HMEs at a breathing volume of 0.5 L varies between 0.5 and 3.6 mg. Both water exchange and wet core weight correlate strongly with the end-inspiratory absolute humidity values (r2 = 0.89/0.87). Hygroscopic salt increases core weight. CONCLUSIONS: The 23 tested HMEs for laryngectomized patients show wide variation in water exchange performance. Water exchange correlates well with the end-inspiratory absolute humidity outcome, which validates the ex vivo weight change method. Wet core weight is a predictor of HME performance. Hygroscopic salt increases the weight of the core material. The results of this study can help medical professionals to obtain a more founded opinion about the performance of available HMEs for pulmonary rehabilitation in laryngectomized patients, and allow them to make an informed decision about which HME type to use.

[1]  L. Brochard,et al.  Humidification performance of 48 passive airway humidifiers: comparison with manufacturer data. , 2009, Chest.

[2]  N. Aaronson,et al.  The influence of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) on the respiratory symptoms after total laryngectomy. , 1991, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[3]  Frans J. M. Hilgers,et al.  Endotracheal temperature and humidity measurements in laryngectomized patients: intra- and inter-patient variability , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  J. E. Fenton,et al.  A study of the effect of a resistive heat moisture exchanger (trachinaze) on pulmonary function and blood gas tensions in patients who have undergone a laryngectomy: A randomized control trial of 50 patients studied over a 6‐month period , 2003, Head & neck.

[5]  F. D. de Jongh,et al.  Assessment of tracheal temperature and humidity in laryngectomized individuals and the influence of a heat and moisture exchanger on tracheal climate , 2008, Head & neck.

[6]  A. Jones,et al.  Raising airway resistance in laryngectomees increases tissue oxygen saturation. , 1996, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[7]  R. J. Scheenstra,et al.  Short-term endotracheal climate changes and clinical effects of a heat and moisture exchanger with an integrated electrostatic virus and bacterial filter developed for laryngectomized individuals , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  J. van Leeuwen,et al.  A newly developed tool for intra-tracheal temperature and humidity assessment in laryngectomized individuals: the Airway Climate Explorer (ACE) , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[9]  M. Nishimura,et al.  Humidification Performance of Humidifying Devices for Tracheostomized Patients With Spontaneous Breathing: A Bench Study , 2013, Respiratory Care.

[10]  A. Jones,et al.  Resistance, humidity and temperature of the tracheal airway. , 1995, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[11]  J. Herranz,et al.  Pulmonary rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: a randomized cross-over clinical trial comparing two different heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) , 2013, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[12]  R. J. Scheenstra,et al.  Heat and moisture exchange capacity of the upper respiratory tract and the effect of tracheotomy breathing on endotracheal climate , 2011, Head & neck.

[13]  R. Branson,et al.  An Efficiency Comparison of Four Heat and Moisture Exchangers Used in the Laryngectomized Patient , 1997, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  A. Ackerstaff,et al.  The effect of a Heat and Moisture Exchanger (Provox® HME) on pulmonary protection after total laryngectomy: a randomized controlled study , 2009, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[15]  J Rathgeber,et al.  [Rapid measurement of water vapor partial pressure at the saturation point with a new hybrid humidity sensor]. , 2000, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[16]  F. Hilgers,et al.  Long‐term Compliance of Laryngectomized Patients With a Specialized Pulmonary Rehabilitation Device , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  R. J. Scheenstra,et al.  Influence of breathing resistance of heat and moisture exchangers on tracheal climate and breathing pattern in laryngectomized individuals , 2009, Head & neck.

[18]  F. Hilgers,et al.  Influence of heat and moisture exchanger respiratory load on transcutaneous oxygenation in laryngectomized individuals: A randomized crossover study , 2007, Head & neck.

[19]  B. Revenäs,et al.  Temperature Variations in Disposable Heat and Moisture Exchangers , 1980, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[20]  R. Latimer,et al.  A comparison of five heat and moisture exchangers , 1986, Anaesthesia.

[21]  N K Aaronson,et al.  Physical and psychosocial consequences of total laryngectomy. , 1990, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[22]  Frans J. M. Hilgers,et al.  Improvements in Respiratory and Psychosocial Functioning following Total Laryngectomy by the Use of a Heat and Moisture Exchanger , 1993, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[23]  F. Hilgers,et al.  A Novel, Simplified Ex Vivo Method for Measuring Water Exchange Performance of Heat and Moisture Exchangers for Tracheostomy Application , 2013, Respiratory Care.

[24]  A. Bahammam,et al.  Humidification During Noninvasive Ventilation in the Critically Ill , 2013, Respiratory Care.

[25]  G. Rettinger,et al.  Tracheal Climate in Laryngectomees after Use of a Heat and Moisture Exchanger , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[26]  F. Hilgers,et al.  Ex vivo water exchange performance and short-term clinical feasibility assessment of newly developed heat and moisture exchangers for pulmonary rehabilitation after total laryngectomy , 2014, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[27]  R. Branson,et al.  Pressure flow characteristics of commonly used heat-moisture exchangers. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[28]  Sven Ingelstedt,et al.  Humidifying Capacity of the Nose , 1970, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[29]  A. Wilkes.  The moisture‐conserving performance of breathing system filters in use with simulated circle anaesthesia breathing systems * , 2004, Anaesthesia.

[30]  S INGELSTEDT,et al.  Studies on the conditioning of air in the respiratory tract. , 1956, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[31]  M. Remacle,et al.  The Belgian experience with the cyranose heat moisture exchange filter. A multicentric pilot study of 12 total laryngectomees , 2003, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.