Theory of Urban Household Automobile-Ownership Decisions

Automobile-ownership behavior is modeled as a function of socioeconomic factors and the availability and levels of service of public transportation systems. Decision makers are assumed to maximize their individual and household utilities within budget and time constraints. The benefits of increased mobility are weighed against the loss in other consumption attributable to ownership of 1 or more automobiles. Variables specific to residential and activity-center locations include the attractiveness of destinations served by public transit, the attractiveness of those not served by public transit, and respective travel times by automobile and transit. Estimation equations are developed through the introduction of functional forms for utility components and random utility terms representing variances in perception and taste and omitted factors. Multinomial logit models are used to define the probability of homogeneous groups of households choosing to own a specific number of automobiles. Calibrations are performed by using data from home-interview surveys and network simulations in the Detroit metropolitan area. Results are encouraging. All coefficients representing partial equilibrium market parameters are signed correctly and are significantly different from 0 where expected, and goodness-of-fit measures indicate acceptable model descriptive power.

[1]  Geoffrey S. Watson,et al.  A Bayesian Study of the Multinomial Distribution , 1967 .

[2]  D. Brand TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING: SOME FOUNDATIONS AND A REVIEW , 1973 .

[3]  M. Beckmann,et al.  A Utility Model for Travel Forecasting , 1971 .

[4]  Henri Theil,et al.  A Multinomial Extension of the Linear Logit Model , 1969 .

[5]  John F. Kain,et al.  Urban Form, Car Ownership and Public Policy: an Appraisal of Traffic in Towns , 1964 .

[6]  T F Golob,et al.  THE SURVEY OF USER-CHOICE OF ALTERNATE TRANSPORTATION MODES , 1970 .

[7]  Alan Wilson,et al.  A statistical theory of spatial distribution models , 1967 .

[8]  H. Theil Principles of econometrics , 1971 .

[9]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  An economic utility theory approach to spatial interaction , 1973 .

[10]  M. E. Beesley,et al.  Forecasting Car Ownership and Use , 1965 .

[11]  H. Theil On the Estimation of Relationships Involving Qualitative Variables , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  J. H. Niedercorn,et al.  AN ECONOMIC DERIVATION OF THE “GRAVITY LAW” OF SPATIAL INTERACTION* , 1969 .

[13]  Nathan Cherniack,et al.  CRITIQUE OF HOME-INTERVIEW TYPE O-D SERVEYS IN URBAN AREAS , 1960 .

[14]  J. G. Cragg Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods , 1971 .

[15]  D. McFadden The Revealed Preferences of a Government Bureaucracy: Theory , 1975 .

[16]  Raymond H Ellis,et al.  THE N-DIMENSIONAL LOGIT MODEL: DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION , 1971 .

[17]  J. G. Cragg,et al.  The Demand for Automobiles , 1970 .

[18]  M. Beckmann,et al.  TRAVELER DECISIONS AND TRAFFIC FLOWS: A BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM , 1974 .

[19]  C. Manski MAXIMUM SCORE ESTIMATION OF THE STOCHASTIC UTILITY MODEL OF CHOICE , 1975 .

[20]  M G Ferreri,et al.  AUTO OWNERSHIP AS AFFECTED BY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES , 1967 .

[21]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  Locational factors in automobile ownership decisions , 1973 .

[22]  Harold D Deutschman,et al.  AUTO OWNERSHIP REVISITED: A REVIEW OF METHODS USED IN ESTIMATING AND DISTRIBUTING AUTO OWNERSHIP , 1967 .

[23]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  STRUCTURE OF PASSENGER TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1974 .

[24]  D T Hartgen,et al.  INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDES AND FAMILY ACTIVITIES: A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF TRAVELER MODE CHOICE , 1970 .

[25]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[26]  Hermann Botzow AN EMPIRICAL METHOD FOR ESTIMATING AUTO COMMUTING COSTS , 1967 .

[27]  R. Dunphy,et al.  TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY AS A DETERMINANT OF AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP , 1973 .

[28]  J. Gurland,et al.  Polychotomous Quantal Response in Biological Assay , 1960 .