Nonlinear Dynamic Response Prediction of a Thin Panel in a Multi-Discipline Environment: Part II—Numerical Predictions

Hypersonic aircraft structures must operate in a complex loading environment, where the coupling of the aircraft structural response with the aerodynamics will lead to conditions involving rich nonlinear dynamics. The modeling of these fluid-thermal-structural interactions is complex and prohibitively expensive when high fidelity models are used (i.e., CFD and FEA). This aspect, and the lack of relevant flight-test and experimental data, have resulted in knowledge gaps, which have led to the design of overly-conservative structures in the past. Work at the Structural Sciences Center (SSC) of the USAF Research Laboratory has focused on addressing these knowledge gaps from a structures perspective. As discussed in Part I of this paper, 3 years ago the SSC began a series of wind-tunnel experiments to provide full-field experimental data for a clamped nominally flat panel exposed to supersonic flow. The present work will focus on numerical predictions of the panel dynamic response using a reduced order model (ROM) for the structural response and full-field measurement data to represent the loads on the panel.

[1]  Robert D. Blevins,et al.  Thermoacoustic loads and fatigue of hypersonic vehicle skin panels , 1993 .

[2]  K. Leung,et al.  Structural Response and Service Life Prediction Concerns in the Design of Hypersonic Flight Vehicle Hot Structure , 2013 .

[3]  Joseph J. Hollkamp,et al.  Modeling Membrane Displacements in the Sonic Fatigue Response Prediction Problem , 2005 .

[4]  S. Rizzi,et al.  Determination of nonlinear stiffness with application to random vibration of geometrically nonlinear structures , 2003 .

[5]  Timothy J. Beberniss,et al.  Full-field, dynamic pressure and displacement measurements of a panel excited by shock boundary-layer interaction , 2013 .

[6]  Jack J. McNamara,et al.  Response of a panel to shock impingement: Modeling and comparison with experiments - part 2 , 2014 .

[7]  S. Michael Spottswood,et al.  A review of indirect/non-intrusive reduced order modeling of nonlinear geometric structures , 2013 .

[8]  Wright-Patterson Afb,et al.  Coupling Acoustics to Nonlinear Structural Models: Predictions and Experiments , 2010 .

[9]  Rob Quiroz,et al.  Air Vehicle Integration and Technology Research (AVIATR). Task Order 0023: Predictive Capability for Hypersonic Structural Response and Life Prediction: Phase 2 - Detailed Design of Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle Hot-Structure , 2012 .

[10]  S. M. Spottswood,et al.  Calibration of aero-structural reduced order models using full-field experimental measurements , 2017 .

[11]  Marc P. Mignolet,et al.  NONLINEAR REDUCED ORDER MODELING OF ISOTROPIC AND FUNCTIONALLY GRADED PLATES , 2008 .