The effect of job rotation during assembly on the quality of final product

Abstract In this study, the effect of job rotation techniques on the final product's quality is investigated in the case of human based assembly environments. High product diversification challenges the limited human capabilities by exposing them to an environment of high fatigue accumulation and high task repetitiveness. The result is a reduction in the final product's quality due to human errors during the assembly. This paper investigates the effect of applying job rotation techniques for the derivation of the operators’ schedules. In this case, the fatigue distribution and the enrichment of the working environment can lead to the reduction of assembly errors. Human error probability quantification techniques have been applied to predict the performance of the assembly line, under a given workload in both cases – with and without job rotation. The approach takes into consideration the characteristics of the operator, the product as well as the assembly environment in order for the probability of error occurrence to be calculated for each assembly task. The method is applied on a case study, involving the assembly of heavy vehicles. The findings indicate that the adoption of job rotation techniques can significantly enhance product quality by drastically reducing the total number of assembly errors.

[1]  Fouad Bennis,et al.  A new simple dynamic muscle fatigue model and its validation , 2022, ArXiv.

[2]  Qian Wang,et al.  Determining numbers of workstations and operators for a linear walking-worker assembly line , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[3]  Alain Bernard,et al.  A framework to develop an analysis agent for evaluating human performance in manufacturing systems , 2009 .

[4]  Kimberly P. Ellis,et al.  Development and application of a worker assignment model to evaluate a lean manufacturing cell , 2009 .

[5]  Faisal Khan,et al.  HEPI: A new tool for human error probability calculation for offshore operation , 2006 .

[6]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Some Central and Peripheral Factors Affecting Human Motoneuronal Output in Neuromuscular Fatigue , 1992, Sports medicine.

[7]  M. B. Aryanezhad,et al.  Designing safe job rotation schedules based upon workers’ skills , 2009 .

[8]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  A new method for estimating human error probabilities: AHP-SLIM , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Helmut Bley,et al.  Appropriate Human Involvement in Assembly and Disassembly , 2004 .

[10]  Ming Liang,et al.  Modeling Job Rotation in Manufacturing Systems: The Study of Employee's Boredom and Skill Variations , 2010 .

[11]  B Kirwan,et al.  Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 1: Overview of approaches. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Heecheon You,et al.  A survey of repetitiveness assessment methodologies for hand-intensive tasks , 2005 .

[13]  P Carayon,et al.  Work organization and ergonomics. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  K. Feldmann,et al.  Development of new concepts and software tools for the optimization of manual assembly systems , 2003 .

[15]  Bryan A. Norman,et al.  A Quantitative Method for Determining Proper Job Rotation Intervals , 2004, Ann. Oper. Res..

[16]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Automotive assembly technologies review: challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach , 2010 .

[17]  Tamio Arai,et al.  Service CAD system to integrate product and human activity for total value , 2009 .

[18]  Chris Baber,et al.  Validating task analysis for error identification: reliability and validity of a human error prediction technique , 2005, Ergonomics.

[19]  R. Darin Ellis,et al.  Performance implications of older workers in technological manufacturing environments: a task-analysis/human reliability perspective , 1999, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[20]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[21]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Dynamic job rotation for workload balancing in human based assembly systems , 2010 .

[22]  Yu Xin,et al.  Notice of RetractionThe gearbox factory assembly line quality accident complexity mensuration due to human errors , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering.

[23]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[24]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  A web based tool for dynamic job rotation scheduling using multiple criteria , 2011 .

[25]  B Kirwan The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques--THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part III--Practical aspects of the usage of the techniques. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  George Chryssolouris,et al.  Manufacturing Systems: Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[27]  Dimitris Mavrikios,et al.  A perspective on manufacturing strategy: Produce more with less , 2008 .

[28]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  The development of a nuclear chemical plant human reliability management approach: HRMS and JHEDI☆ , 1997 .

[29]  Karlheinz Schaub,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders in assembly jobs in the automotive industry with special reference to age management aspects , 2008 .

[30]  Adem Göleç,et al.  A fuzzy model for competency-based employee evaluation and selection , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[31]  Pisal Yenradee,et al.  A master scheduling model with skilled and unskilled temporary workers , 2006 .

[32]  Bernd Hamann,et al.  Noise investigation in manufacturing systems: An acoustic simulation and virtual reality enhanced method , 2012 .

[33]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy,et al.  Quality prediction for reconfigurable manufacturing systems via human error modelling , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[34]  Dan Högberg,et al.  The impact of information presentation on work environment and product quality : A case study , 2008 .

[35]  J A Eklund,et al.  Relationships between ergonomics and quality in assembly work. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[36]  David Ben-Arieh,et al.  Line balancing for non-traditional assembly lines, mixed models, and sequence-dependent assembly times , 1995 .