Lexicographic bottleneck mixed-model assembly line balancing problem: Artificial bee colony and tabu search approaches with optimised parameters

Lexicographic bottleneck mixed-model assembly line balancing problem is studied.Artificial bee colony and tabu search algorithms are proposed.Parameters of the proposed algorithms are optimised using response surface method.Test problems are solved to assess the performance of the proposed methods.It is observed that both algorithms provide promising results in reasonable times. The lexicographic bottleneck assembly line balancing problem is a recently introduced problem which aims at obtaining a smooth workload distribution among workstations. This is achieved hierarchically. The workload of the most heavily loaded workstation is minimised, followed by the workload of the second most heavily loaded workstation and so on. This study contributes to knowledge by examining the application of the lexicographic bottleneck objective on mixed-model lines, where more than one product model is produced in an inter-mixed sequence. The main characteristics of the lexicographic bottleneck mixed-model assembly line balancing problem are described with numerical examples. Another contribution of the study is the methodology used to deal with the complex structure of the problem. Two effective meta-heuristic approaches, namely artificial bee colony and tabu search, are proposed. The parameters of the proposed meta-heuristics are optimised using response surface methodology, which is a well-known design of experiments technique, as a unique contribution to the expert and intelligent systems literature. Different from the common tendency in the literature (which aims to optimise one parameter at a time), all parameters are optimised simultaneously. Therefore, it is shown how a complex production planning problem can be solved using sophisticated artificial intelligence techniques with optimised parameters. The methodology used for parameter setting can be applied to other metaheuristics for solving complex problems in practice. The performances of both algorithms are assessed using well-known test problems and it is observed that both algorithms find promising solutions. Artificial bee colony algorithm outperforms tabu search in minimising the number of workstations while tabu search shows a better performance in minimising the value of lexicographic bottleneck objective function.

[1]  Gunhan Mirac Bayhan,et al.  A hybrid genetic algorithm for mixed model assembly line balancing problem with parallel workstations and zoning constraints , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[2]  Bilal Toklu,et al.  Balancing of mixed-model two-sided assembly lines , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[3]  Parames Chutima,et al.  Multi-objective two-sided mixed-model assembly line balancing using particle swarm optimisation with negative knowledge , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[4]  Napsiah Ismail,et al.  A tabu search approach for mixed-model parallel assembly line balancing problem (type II) , 2011 .

[5]  Pedro M. Vilarinho,et al.  A two-stage heuristic method for balancing mixed-model assembly lines with parallel workstations , 2002 .

[6]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  Balancing Parallel Two-Sided Assembly Lines with Ant Colony Optimisation Algorithm , 2013 .

[7]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm , 2009, Appl. Math. Comput..

[8]  Adil Baykasoglu,et al.  Hybridizing ant colony optimization via genetic algorithm for mixed-model assembly line balancing problem with sequence dependent setup times between tasks , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  C. Reeves Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems , 1993 .

[10]  Lale Özbakır,et al.  Bee colony intelligence in zone constrained two-sided assembly line balancing problem , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Hadi Gökçen,et al.  Balancing and sequencing of parallel mixed-model assembly lines , 2010 .

[12]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  Balancing mixed-model parallel two-sided assembly lines , 2013, Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM).

[13]  D. Zhang,et al.  Mathematical Model and Agent Based Solution Approach for the Simultaneous Balancing and Sequencing of Mixed ‐ Model Parallel Two ‐ Sided Assembly , 2014 .

[14]  Uğur Özcan,et al.  A genetic algorithm for the stochastic mixed-model U-line balancing and sequencing problem , 2011 .

[15]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches , 2013 .

[16]  Nils Boysen,et al.  A classification of assembly line balancing problems , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Ana S. Simaria,et al.  A genetic algorithm based approach to the mixed-model assembly line balancing problem of type II , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[18]  Karen A. F. Copeland Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Ed. , 2001 .

[19]  Michel Gendreau,et al.  An Introduction to Tabu Search , 2003, Handbook of Metaheuristics.

[20]  Uğur Özcan,et al.  A tabu search algorithm for two-sided assembly line balancing , 2009 .

[21]  Nuchsara Kriengkorakot,et al.  The Assembly Line Balancing Problem : Review articles * , 2012 .

[22]  Fred Glover,et al.  Tabu Search - Part II , 1989, INFORMS J. Comput..

[23]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  Type-E parallel two-sided assembly line balancing problem: Mathematical model and ant colony optimisation based approach with optimised parameters , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[24]  Aslan Deniz Karaoglan,et al.  Optimization of PI parameters for DSP-based permanent magnet brushless motor drive using response surface methodology , 2012 .

[25]  Fariborz Jolai,et al.  Mixed-model assembly line balancing in the make-to-order and stochastic environment using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  A new hybrid genetic algorithm to solve more realistic mixed-model assembly line balancing problem , 2013 .

[27]  Özgür Yalçinkaya,et al.  Modelling and optimization of average travel time for a metro line by simulation and response surface methodology , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  A mathematical model and genetic algorithm-based approach for parallel two-sided assembly line balancing problem , 2015 .

[29]  Ana S. Simaria,et al.  2-ANTBAL: An ant colony optimisation algorithm for balancing two-sided assembly lines , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[30]  Lale Özbakir,et al.  Bees Algorithm for constrained fuzzy multi-objective two-sided assembly line balancing problem , 2012, Optim. Lett..

[31]  Nick T. Thomopoulos,et al.  Mixed Model Line Balancing with Smoothed Station Assignments , 1970 .

[32]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[33]  E. Alba,et al.  Metaheuristic Procedures for Training Neutral Networks , 2006 .

[34]  Betul Yagmahan,et al.  Mixed-model assembly line balancing using a multi-objective ant colony optimization approach , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Masoud Rabbani,et al.  Balancing of mixed-model two-sided assembly lines with multiple U-shaped layout , 2012 .

[36]  Nick T. Thomopoulos,et al.  Line Balancing-Sequencing for Mixed-Model Assembly , 1967 .

[37]  M. Teki̇n,et al.  A mixed integer linear programming formulation for optimal balancing of mixed-model U-lines , 2009 .

[38]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  AN IDEA BASED ON HONEY BEE SWARM FOR NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION , 2005 .

[39]  Alper Hamzadayi,et al.  A genetic algorithm based approach for simultaneously balancing and sequencing of mixed-model U-lines with parallel workstations and zoning constraints , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[40]  Manuel Laguna,et al.  Tabu Search , 1997 .

[41]  Fariborz Jolai,et al.  A Simulated Annealing algorithm for a mixed model assembly U-line balancing type-I problem considering human efficiency and Just-In-Time approach , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[42]  Weida Xu,et al.  Strategic robust mixed model assembly line balancing based on scenario planning , 2011 .

[43]  Angel B. Ruiz,et al.  Balancing assembly lines with tabu search , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Ana Sofia Simaria Assembly line balacing: new perspectives and procedures , 2006 .

[45]  Rafael Pastor LB-ALBP: the lexicographic bottleneck assembly line balancing problem , 2011 .

[46]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  Simultaneous balancing and sequencing of mixed-model parallel two-sided assembly lines , 2014 .

[47]  Hadi Gökçen,et al.  A Tabu Search Algorithm for the Parallel Assembly Line Balancing Problem , 2009 .

[48]  Rafael Pastor,et al.  A heuristic procedure for solving the Lexicographic Bottleneck Assembly Line Balancing Problem (LB-ALBP) , 2012 .

[49]  Maurizio Faccio,et al.  Design configuration for a mixed-model assembly system in case of low product demand , 2007 .

[50]  W. T. Goh,et al.  An intelligent and adaptive modelling and configuration approach to manufacturing systems control , 2003 .

[51]  Hadi Gökçen,et al.  Balancing parallel two-sided assembly lines , 2010 .

[52]  Lale Özbakir,et al.  Modeling and solving constrained two-sided assembly line balancing problem via bee algorithms , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[53]  Hadi Gökçen,et al.  Binary integer formulation for mixed-model assembly line balancing problem , 1998 .

[54]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  Mathematical model and agent based solution approach for the simultaneous balancing and sequencing of mixed-model parallel two-sided assembly lines , 2014 .

[55]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  Tabu Search - Part I , 1989, INFORMS J. Comput..

[56]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  Using response surface design to determine the optimal parameters of genetic algorithm and a case study , 2013 .

[57]  Adil Baykasoğlu,et al.  Modeling and solving mixed-model assembly line balancing problem with setups. Part I: A mixed integer linear programming model , 2014 .

[58]  D. Pham,et al.  THE BEES ALGORITHM, A NOVEL TOOL FOR COMPLEX OPTIMISATION PROBLEMS , 2006 .

[59]  Marija Ivanovic A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Restrained Roman Domination Problem , 2015 .

[60]  J. H. Huang,et al.  Applying multi-agent approach to mixed-model assembly line balancing , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology (ICMIT).

[61]  Aslan Deniz Karaoglan,et al.  Optimizing Karnopp friction model parameters of a pendulum using RSM , 2014, Eur. J. Control.