Provider-specific quality measurement for ERCP using natural language processing.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Natural language processing (NLP) is an information retrieval technique that has been shown to accurately identify quality measures for colonoscopy. There are no systematic methods by which to track adherence to quality measures for ERCP, the highest risk endoscopic procedure widely used in practice. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of using NLP to measure adherence to ERCP quality indicators across individual providers. METHODS ERCPs performed by 6 providers at a single institution from 2006 to 2014 were identified. Quality measures were defined using society guidelines and from expert opinion, and then extracted using a combination of NLP and data mining (eg, ICD9-CM codes). Validation for each quality measure was performed by manual record review. Quality measures were grouped into preprocedure (5), intraprocedure (6), and postprocedure (2). NLP was evaluated using measures of precision and accuracy. RESULTS A total of 23,674 ERCPs were analyzed (average patient age, 52.9 ± 17.8 years, 14,113 were women [59.6%]). Among 13 quality measures, precision of NLP ranged from 84% to 100% with intraprocedure measures having lower precision (84% for precut sphincterotomy). Accuracy of NLP ranged from 90% to 100% with intraprocedure measures having lower accuracy (90% for pancreatic stent placement). CONCLUSIONS NLP in conjunction with data mining facilitates individualized tracking of ERCP providers for quality metrics without the need for manual medical record review. Incorporation of these tools across multiple centers may permit tracking of ERCP quality measures through national registries.

[1]  Timothy D. Imler,et al.  Multi-Center Colonoscopy Quality Measurement Utilizing Natural Language Processing , 2014, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[2]  William K. Thompson,et al.  Anatomic and Advanced Adenoma Detection Rates as Quality Metrics Determined via Natural Language Processing , 2014, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[3]  Christopher D. Jensen,et al.  Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  Lonnie Blevins,et al.  The Indiana network for patient care: a working local health information infrastructure. An example of a working infrastructure collaboration that links data from five health systems and hundreds of millions of entries. , 2005, Health affairs.

[5]  Timothy D. Imler,et al.  Natural language processing accurately categorizes findings from colonoscopy and pathology reports. , 2013, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[6]  Walter G. Park,et al.  Quality indicators for ERCP. , 2015, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[7]  Walter G. Park,et al.  Quality indicators for EUS. , 2015, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  Timothy D. Imler,et al.  Lower Provider Volume is Associated With Higher Failure Rates for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography , 2013, Medical care.

[9]  Chyke A Doubeni,et al.  Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Walter G. Park,et al.  Quality indicators for EGD. , 2015, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[11]  D. Hewett,et al.  Improving Colonoscopy Quality Through Health-Care Payment Reform , 2010, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  Wendy W. Chapman,et al.  Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  Douglas K. Rex,et al.  Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[14]  Michelle A. Anderson,et al.  Complications of ERCP. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  Cynthia S. Johnson,et al.  Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. , 2013, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  Shaun J Grannis,et al.  The Indiana network for patient care: an integrated clinical information system informed by over thirty years of experience. , 2004, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[17]  L. Laine,et al.  Influence of Colonoscopy Quality Measures on Patients’ Colonoscopist Selection , 2015, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[18]  Joshua B. Colton,et al.  Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  C. Duller,et al.  Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project. , 2008, Endoscopy.

[20]  Henk Harkema,et al.  Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.