Nanosized aerosols from consumer sprays: experimental analysis and exposure modeling for four commercial products

Consumer spray products are already on the market in the cosmetics and household sector, which suggest by their label that they contain engineered nanoparticles (ENP). Sprays are considered critical for human health, because the lungs represent a major route for the uptake of ENP into the human body. To contribute to the exposure assessment of ENP in consumer spray products, we analyzed ENP in four commercially available sprays: one antiperspirant, two shoe impregnation sprays, and one plant-strengthening agent. The spray dispersions were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) and (scanning-) transmission electron microscopy ((S)TEM). Aerosols were generated by using the original vessels, and analyzed by scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and (S)TEM. On the basis of SMPS results, the nanosized aerosol depositing in the respiratory tract was modeled for female and male consumers. The derived exposure levels reflect a single spray application. We identified ENP in the dispersions of two products (shoe impregnation and plant spray). Nanosized aerosols were observed in three products that contained propellant gas. The aerosol number concentration increased linearly with the sprayed amount, with the highest concentration resulting from the antiperspirant. Modeled aerosol exposure levels were in the range of 1010 nanosized aerosol components per person and application event for the antiperspirant and the impregnation sprays, with the largest fraction of nanosized aerosol depositing in the alveolar region. Negligible exposure from the application of the plant spray (pump spray) was observed.

[1]  David Vernez,et al.  Acute Respiratory Syndrome After Inhalation of Waterproofing Sprays: A Posteriori Exposure-Response Assessment in 102 Cases , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[2]  W. Koch,et al.  In-flight spraying in aircrafts: determination of the exposure scenario. , 2004, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[3]  Pasi Aalto,et al.  Aerosol Particle Number Concentration Measurements in Five European Cities Using TSI-3022 Condensation Particle Counter over a Three-Year Period during Health Effects of Air Pollution on Susceptible Subpopulations , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Estimating Consumer Exposure to PFOS and PFOA , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Particle emission factors during cooking activities , 2009 .

[6]  Icrp Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1994 .

[7]  Andrew D. Maynard,et al.  Nanotechnology: assessing the risks , 2006 .

[8]  Theoretical and Experimental Evaluation of a Portable Electrostatic TEM Sampler , 2007 .

[9]  E. Park,et al.  Nanosized titanium dioxide enhanced inflammatory responses in the septic brain of mouse , 2010, Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Aitken,et al.  Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements , 2007 .

[11]  U. Matson,et al.  Indoor and outdoor concentrations of ultrafine particles in some Scandinavian rural and urban areas. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Vincent Castranova,et al.  Iron oxide nanoparticles induce human microvascular endothelial cell permeability through reactive oxygen species production and microtubule remodeling , 2009, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[13]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[14]  Inge Mangelsdorf,et al.  Inhalational and dermal exposures during spray application of biocides. , 2005, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[15]  Allison DenBleyker,et al.  Air pollutant concentrations near three Texas roadways, Part I: Ultrafine particles , 2009 .

[16]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Toxicology of nanoparticles: A historical perspective , 2007 .

[17]  Julie W. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy , 2005, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[18]  Martin Mohr,et al.  Oxidative stress and inflammation response after nanoparticle exposure: differences between human lung cell monocultures and an advanced three-dimensional model of the human epithelial airways , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Bremmer Hj,et al.  Cosmetics Fact Sheet. To assess the risks for the consumer. Updated version for ConsExpo 4 , 2006 .

[20]  Ladd W. Smith,et al.  Simulated inhalation levels of fragrance materials in a surrogate air freshener formulation. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Alok Dhawan,et al.  Nanomaterials: A challenge for toxicologists , 2009 .

[22]  K. Wittmaack In Search of the Most Relevant Parameter for Quantifying Lung Inflammatory Response to Nanoparticle Exposure: Particle Number, Surface Area, or What? , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  Birgit Engelund,et al.  Mapping and health assessment of chemical substances in shoe care products , 2005 .

[24]  Petra Krystek,et al.  Particle size-dependent organ distribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[25]  Manuela Semmler-Behnke,et al.  Biodistribution of 1.4- and 18-nm gold particles in rats. , 2008, Small.

[26]  W. Koch,et al.  Aircraft disinsection: exposure assessment and evaluation of a new pre-embarkation method. , 2006, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[27]  Sophie Lanone,et al.  Comparative toxicity of 24 manufactured nanoparticles in human alveolar epithelial and macrophage cell lines , 2009, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[28]  Wei Liu,et al.  Toxicity and penetration of TiO2 nanoparticles in hairless mice and porcine skin after subchronic dermal exposure. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[29]  John Pendergrass,et al.  Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies , 2007 .

[30]  J. Treadway,et al.  341. Implementation of a Negotiated Consent Agreement Between the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Refractory Ceramic Fiber Coalition (RCFC) to Collect Airborne Fiber Exposure Data , 1999 .

[31]  Paride Mantecca,et al.  Impact of tire debris on in vitro and in vivo systems , 2005, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[32]  Cynthia Howard-Reed,et al.  Source strengths of ultrafine and fine particles due to cooking with a gas stove. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  W. Kreyling,et al.  Health implications of nanoparticles , 2006 .

[34]  M. Suzuki,et al.  Mist particle diameters are related to the toxicity of waterproofing sprays: comparison between toxic and non-toxic products. , 1997, Veterinary and human toxicology.

[35]  J. Konz,et al.  Exposure factors handbook , 1989 .

[36]  Martin Scheringer,et al.  Size-fractionated characterization and quantification of nanoparticle release rates from a consumer spray product containing engineered nanoparticles , 2010 .