A Resilience-Based Methodology for Improved Water Resources Adaptation Planning under Deep Uncertainty with Real World Application

Resilience of a water resource system in terms of water supply meeting future demand under climate change and other uncertainties is a prominent issue worldwide. This paper presents an alternative methodology to the conventional engineering practice in the UK for identifying long-term adaptation planning strategies in the context of resilience. More specifically, a resilience-based multi-objective optimization method is proposed that identifies Pareto optimal future adaptation strategies by maximizing a water supply system’s resilience (calculated as the maximum recorded duration of a water deficit period over a given planning horizon) and minimizing total associated costs, subject to meeting target system robustness to uncertain projections (scenarios) of future supply and demand. The method is applied to a real-world case study for Bristol Water’s water resource zone and the results are compared with those derived using a more conventional engineering practice in the UK, utilizing a least-cost optimization analysis constrained to a target reliability level. The results obtained reveal that the strategy solution derived using the current practice methodology produce a less resilient system than the similar costing solutions identified using the proposed resilience driven methodology. At the same time, resilience driven strategies are only slightly less reliable suggesting that trade-off exists between the two. Further examination of intervention strategies selected shows that the conventional methodology encourages implementation of more lower cost intervention options early in the planning horizon (to achieve higher system reliability) whereas the resilience-based methodology encourages more uniform intervention options sequenced over the planning horizon (to achieve higher system resilience).

[1]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation , 1982 .

[2]  Jared L. Cohon,et al.  A Programming Model for Analysis of the Reliability, Resilience, and Vulnerability of a Water Supply Reservoir , 1986 .

[3]  J. Kindler,et al.  Multiple criteria for evaluation of reliability aspects of water resource systems , 1995 .

[4]  D. Loucks.  Quantifying trends in system sustainability , 1997 .

[5]  M. Allen,et al.  Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle , 2002, Nature.

[6]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[7]  H. Fowler,et al.  Modeling the impacts of climatic change and variability on the reliability, resilience, and vulnerability of a water resource system , 2003 .

[8]  R. Grosberg,et al.  Climate Change, Human Impacts, and the Resilience of Coral Reefs , 2003, Science.

[9]  W. Neil Adger,et al.  Does Adaptive Management of Natural Resources Enhance Resilience to Climate Change , 2004 .

[10]  Dan Rosbjerg,et al.  Choice of reliability, resilience and vulnerability estimators for risk assessments of water resources systems / Choix d’estimateurs de fiabilité, de résilience et de vulnérabilité pour les analyses de risque de systèmes de ressources en eau , 2004 .

[11]  Rebecca A. Kelly,et al.  A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  State of the Art for Genetic Algorithms and Beyond in Water Resources Planning and Management , 2010 .

[13]  Z. Kapelan,et al.  Using Information-Gap Decision Theory for Water Resources Planning Under Severe Uncertainty , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[14]  Casey Brown,et al.  Decision scaling: Linking bottom‐up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector , 2012 .

[15]  W. Walker,et al.  Deep Uncertainty , 2012 .

[16]  J. Harou,et al.  Selecting Portfolios of Water Supply and Demand Management Strategies Under Uncertainty—Contrasting Economic Optimisation and ‘Robust Decision Making’ Approaches , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[17]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future , 2012 .

[18]  Casey Brown,et al.  Robustness indicators for evaluation under climate change: Application to the upper Great Lakes , 2013 .

[19]  Julien J. Harou,et al.  Robust Decision Making and Info-Gap Decision Theory for water resource system planning , 2013 .

[20]  Donghwi Jung.  Robust and Resilient Water Distribution Systems , 2013 .

[21]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Developing dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a computer-assisted approach for developing adaptive strategies for a deeply uncertain world , 2015, Climatic Change.

[22]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[23]  Patrick A. Ray,et al.  Performance-Based Evaluation of an Improved Robust Optimization Formulation , 2014 .

[24]  Paul Jeffrey,et al.  Linking climate projections to performance: A yield‐based decision scaling assessment of a large urban water resources system , 2014 .

[25]  I. Linkov,et al.  Changing the resilience paradigm , 2014 .

[26]  H. Maier,et al.  Including adaptation and mitigation responses to climate change in a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm framework for urban water supply systems incorporating GHG emissions , 2014 .

[27]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Comparison of Info-gap and Robust Optimisation Methods for Integrated Water Resource Management under Severe Uncertainty☆ , 2015 .

[28]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Adaptive, multiobjective optimal sequencing approach for urban water supply augmentation under deep uncertainty , 2015 .

[29]  Qi Wang,et al.  Two-Objective Design of Benchmark Problems of a Water Distribution System via MOEAs: Towards the Best-Known Approximation of the True Pareto Front , 2015 .

[30]  David G. Groves,et al.  Developing Key Indicators for Adaptive Water Planning , 2015 .

[31]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Comparison of Robust Optimization and Info-Gap Methods for Water Resource Management under Deep Uncertainty , 2016 .

[32]  Kash Barker,et al.  A review of definitions and measures of system resilience , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[33]  H. Maier,et al.  Comparison of the Searching Behavior of NSGA-II, SAMODE, and Borg MOEAs Applied to Water Distribution System Design Problems , 2016 .

[34]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  An uncertain future, deep uncertainty, scenarios, robustness and adaptation: How do they fit together? , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..