Fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) for the analysis of team communication.

Communication in teams plays a vital role in team success. This work proposes Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) as a formalized, team communication methodology for the analysis of content and flow, simultaneously, of naturalistic team communication in a structured environment. Several methods of analysis of team communication exist. Few of them, however, analyze the flow and content of communication simultaneously, and none with teams using naturalistic language. Team communication data is coded for flow and content (through speech acts), then turned into FCMs for visual and statistical analysis. Results show that when using the FCM methodology both flow and content of communication can be diagrammed at the individual level, however, when assessing at the team level, what is illustrated is the flow of content. The application of different statistical analyses to the FCM output provides the opportunity to answer various questions on team communication. This study demonstrates that by using speech acts (SAs) as nodes, FCMs can illustrate and analyze team communication flow and content for naturalistic language. The FCM methodology is a powerful tool for studying team communication, and further incremental work could advance knowledge in team communication dynamics and provide contributions to graph theory. This method provides a visual overview of team communication dynamics in a naturalistic language setting, thus allowing for the study of intra-team dynamics and inter-team dynamics simultaneously.

[1]  J. Swan Exploring Knowledge and Cognitions in Decisions About Technological Innovation: Mapping Managerial Cognitions , 1995 .

[2]  Jung Hyup Kim,et al.  Developing Metacognitive Models for Team-Based Dynamic Environment Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping , 2013, HCI.

[3]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Procedural Network Representations of Sequential Data , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  G. Matthew Bonham,et al.  Cognitive mapping as a technique for supporting international negotiation , 1993 .

[5]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Preface to the Special Section on Methods for the Analysis of Communication , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Byung Sung Yoon,et al.  Comparative analysis for Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping , 2016, 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).

[7]  W. Harvey Hegarty,et al.  Decision Makers' Beliefs About the Causes and Effects of Structure: An Exploratory Study , 1984 .

[8]  Colin Eden,et al.  Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Athanasios K. Tsadiras,et al.  Comparing the inference capabilities of binary, trivalent and sigmoid fuzzy cognitive maps , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[10]  Ling Rothrock,et al.  Applying Fuzzy Linear Regression to Understand Metacognitive Judgments in a Human-in-the-Loop Simulation Environment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[11]  Benson Rosen,et al.  The Impact of Demographic Heterogeneity and Team Leader-Team Member Demographic Fit on Team Empowerment and Effectiveness , 2004 .

[12]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Engineering , 1996 .

[13]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Advances in Measuring Team Cognition , 2003 .

[14]  C. Eden,et al.  THE INTERSUBJECTIVITY OF ISSUES AND ISSUES OF INTERSUBJECTIVITY , 1981 .

[15]  Dominique Engome Tchupo,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Patterns Communication and Team Performance , 2017 .

[16]  Morton B. Brown,et al.  Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances , 1974 .

[17]  S. Mohammed,et al.  The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have No Shared Schema , 2000 .

[18]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Selective Benefits of Question Self-Generation and Answering for Remembering Expository Text , 2012 .

[19]  P. Bliese Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[20]  Steven E. Stemler,et al.  An Overview of Content Analysis. , 2001 .

[21]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[22]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Dynamical Perspectives on Team Cognition , 2004 .

[23]  John Messner,et al.  INVOLVE: Developing Interactive Workspaces That Impact Communication and Task Performance When Using Virtual Prototypes , 2014 .

[24]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Training Adaptive Teams , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[25]  Jamie C. Gorman Team Coordination Dynamics and the Interactive Approach: Emerging Evidence and Future Work , 2011, HCI.

[26]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  The organizational neurodynamics of teams. , 2013, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[27]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  The Role of Shared Mental Models in Developing Team Situational Awareness: Implications for Training , 2017 .

[28]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team coordination dynamics. , 2010, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[29]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2004 .

[30]  Steven A. Gray,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps as Representations of Mental Models and Group Beliefs , 2014, Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Applied Sciences and Engineering.

[31]  Koen Vanhoof,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Modeling Complex Systems , 2010, MICAI.

[32]  F. Berkes,et al.  Ecological complexity, fuzzy logic, and holism in indigenous knowledge , 2009 .

[33]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[34]  Frédéric M. Vanwindekens,et al.  Development of a broadened cognitive mapping approach for analysing systems of practices in social-ecological systems , 2013 .

[35]  John Messner,et al.  Improving Site Utilization Planning through the Use of Interactive Workspaces , 2009 .

[36]  Robert Leicht A FRAMEWORK FOR PLANNING EFFECTIVE COLLABORATION USING INTERACTIVE WORKSPACES , 2009 .

[37]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Cognitive Neurophysiologic Synchronies , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[38]  D. Dent,et al.  Tools for Assessment of Communication Skills of Hospital Action Teams: A Systematic Review. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[39]  Voula C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Fuzzy cognitive map architectures for medical decision support systems , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[40]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[41]  G. Stewart A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[42]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Team Mental Models: Techniques, Methods, and Analytic Approaches , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[43]  Paul P. Wang,et al.  Fuzzy sets : theory and applications to policy analysis and information systems , 1981 .

[44]  Kathleen M. Carley Coding Choices for Textual Analysis: A Comparison of Content Analysis and Map Analysis , 1993 .

[45]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .