Inequality and welfare evaluation of heterogeneous income distributions

Abstract This paper establishes the principles that should govern the welfare and inequality analysis of heterogeneous income distributions. Two basic criteria – the ‘equity preference’ condition and the ‘compensation principle’ – are shown to be fundamentally incompatible. The paper favours the latter, thereby vindicating the traditional method of dealing with heterogeneous samples. However, inequality and welfare comparisons will usually be well defined only if equivalent incomes are obtained using constant scale factors; and researchers will need to distinguish clearly between inequality of nominal incomes and inequality of living standards. Furthermore, household observations must always be weighted according to family size.

[1]  R. Kanbur,et al.  How Serious Is The Neglectof Intra-Household Inequality? , 1989 .

[2]  Patrick Moyes,et al.  Transformations of Stochastic Orderings , 1994 .

[3]  B. Arnold Majorization and the Lorenz Order: A Brief Introduction , 1987 .

[4]  P. Lambert,et al.  Welfare Comparisons: Sequential Procedures for Heterogeneous Populations , 2002 .

[5]  Stephen P. Jenkins,et al.  RANKING INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS WHEN NEEDS DIFFER , 1993 .

[6]  R. Pollak Welfare comparisons and situation comparisons , 1991 .

[7]  A. Shorrocks Ranking Income Distributions , 1983 .

[8]  C. Nicol Identifiability of Household Equivalence Scales through Exact Aggregation: Some Empirical Results , 1994 .

[9]  Anthony B. Atkinson,et al.  Income Distribution and Differences in Needs , 1987 .

[10]  A. Atkinson,et al.  The Comparison of Multi-Dimensioned Distributions of Economic Status , 1982 .

[11]  D. Conniffe The Non-constancy of Equivalence Scales , 1992 .

[12]  Kai-yuen Tsui,et al.  Multidimensional poverty indices , 2002, Soc. Choice Welf..

[13]  Esfandiar Maasoumi,et al.  Multidimensioned Approaches to Welfare Analysis , 1999 .

[14]  F. Bourguignon On the Measurement of Inequality , 2003 .

[15]  Julie A. Nelson Household Equivalence Scales: Theory versus Policy? , 1993, Journal of Labor Economics.

[16]  Paul Glewwe,et al.  Household equivalence scales and the measurement of inequality: Transfers from the poor to the rich could decrease inequality , 1991 .

[17]  S. Ringen Households, Standard of Living, and Inequality , 1991 .

[18]  Ok On evaluating social welfare by sequential generalized Lorenz dominance , 1999 .

[19]  S. Danziger,et al.  The Income Unit and the Anatomy of Income Distribution , 1979 .

[20]  Udo Ebert,et al.  Equivalence Scales Reconsidered , 2002 .

[21]  S. Jenkins,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN NEEDS AND ASSESSMENT OF INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS , 1992 .

[22]  C. Murray Income Inequality and IQ , 1998 .

[23]  W. Eichhorn,et al.  Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality , 1994 .

[24]  E. Lazear,et al.  Estimating the Personal Distribution of Income with Adjustment for within- Family Variation , 1986, Journal of Labor Economics.

[25]  E. Lazear,et al.  Allocation of Income Within the Household. , 1989 .

[26]  A. Lewbel,et al.  Household equivalence scales and welfare comparisons , 1989 .

[27]  K. Pendakur,et al.  Semiparametric Estimates and Test of Base-Independent Equiv-alence Scales , 1999 .

[28]  A. Sen,et al.  On Economic Inequality , 1999 .

[29]  Reference type-independent heterogeneous social evaluation , 2003 .

[30]  A. Trannoy About the right weights of the social welfare function when needs differ , 2003 .

[31]  D. Champernowne,et al.  On Economic Inequality. , 1974 .

[32]  Diganta Mukherjee,et al.  Measuring multidimensional deprivation , 2001, Math. Soc. Sci..

[33]  F. Cowell,et al.  Inequality: Measurement , 2006 .

[34]  The Structure Of American Income Inequality , 2005 .

[35]  Duncan C. Thomas Intra-household resource allocation: an inferential approach , 1990 .

[36]  Tsui Kai-yuen,et al.  Multidimensional Generalizations of the Relative and Absolute Inequality Indices: The Atkinson-Kolm-Sen Approach , 1995 .

[37]  E. Maasoumi The Measurement and Decomposition of Multi-dimensional Inequality , 1986 .

[38]  R. Kanbur,et al.  How serious is the neglect of intrahousehold inequality , 1990 .

[39]  Udo Ebert,et al.  Using equivalent income of equivalent adults to rank income distributions , 1999 .

[40]  Udo Edbert,et al.  Social Welfare when Needs Differ: An Axiomatic Approach , 1997 .

[41]  Udo Ebert,et al.  Income inequality and differences in household size , 1995 .

[42]  Alain Trannoy,et al.  Welfare comparisons with bounded equivalence scales , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[43]  Timothy M. Smeeding,et al.  EQUIVALENCE SCALES, WELL‐BEING, INEQUALITY, AND POVERTY: SENSITIVITY ESTIMATES ACROSS TEN COUNTRIES USING THE LUXEMBOURG INCOME STUDY (LIS) DATABASE , 1988 .

[44]  C. Blackorby,et al.  Adult-equivalence scales and the economic implementation of interpersonal comparisons of well-being , 1993 .

[45]  G. M. Clemence,et al.  Blow up of smooth solutions to the barotropic compressible magnetohydrodynamic equations with finite mass and energy , 2008, 0811.4359.

[46]  S. Kolm The Optimal Production of Social Justice , 1969 .

[47]  Kevin Roberts,et al.  Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory , 1980 .

[48]  G. Pyatt Social Evaluation Criteria , 1990 .

[49]  I. Olkin,et al.  Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications , 1980 .

[50]  K. Tsui,et al.  Multidimensional inequality and multidimensional generalized entropy measures: An axiomatic derivation , 1999 .

[51]  F. Bourguignon,et al.  Family size and social utility: income distribution dominance criteria. , 1989, Journal of econometrics.