Modeling and development of an auxetic foam-based multimodal capacitive strain gauge

Auxetics are mechanical metamaterials with the unique properties of expanding their transversal section upon longitudinal positive strain, decoupling the deformations in normal and transversal directions. Such property can be exploited to develop soft sensors that can provide feedback to different mechanical stimuli, e.g. pressure and shear force. In this work, we propose for the first time a mathematical model to analytically simulate and design the auxetic behavior in a capacitive strain gauge, and show that, for a polyurethane (PU) auxetic foam, Poisson Ratio’s values can satisfy the negative gauge factor (GF) condition. We develop an innovative thermo-compressive process to obtain anisotropic auxetic PU sponges both in normal and normal/radial directions, and their mechanical properties are in agreement with the theoretical calculations validating our model. Then, we develop a capacitive strain gauge by integrating a normal auxetic PU foam with polydimethylsiloxane /carbon nanotubes electrodes. Results show that the capacitive change caused by an external force, is proportional to the induced deformation, but importantly it is also dependent on the direction of the applied force. A negative GF of GF = −2.8 is obtained for a longitudinal strain range up to 10%. This auxetic foam structure guarantees flexibility and paves the way for an improved design freedom for multimodal mechanical soft sensors providing new opportunities towards smart wearables and perceptive soft robots.

[1]  F. Scarpa,et al.  Anisotropy in conventional and uniaxially thermoformed auxetic polymer foams , 2022, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[2]  C. Casavola,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of the Poisson’s ratio on soft polyurethane foams under tensile and cyclic compression load , 2021, Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures.

[3]  Simon Laflamme,et al.  Soft Elastomeric Capacitor for Angular Rotation Sensing in Steel Components , 2021, Sensors.

[4]  Jianzhong Fu,et al.  High-Performance Auxetic Bilayer Conductive Mesh-Based Multi-Material Integrated Stretchable Strain Sensors. , 2021, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[5]  Mark Melnykowycz,et al.  2D Printing of Piezoresistive Auxetic Silicone Sensor Structures , 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[6]  William N. Collins,et al.  Investigation of surface textured sensing skin for fatigue crack localization and quantification , 2021 .

[7]  M. de Vittorio,et al.  A Flexible Carbon Nanotubes-Based Auxetic Sponge Electrode for Strain Sensors , 2020, Nanomaterials.

[8]  Simon Laflamme,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Auxetic Textured Soft Strain Gauge for Monitoring Animal Skin , 2020, Italian National Conference on Sensors.

[9]  J. Kadkhodapour,et al.  Highly sensitive, piezoresistive, silicone/carbon fiber-based auxetic sensor for low strain values , 2020 .

[10]  Jun Shintake,et al.  Sensitivity Improvement of Highly Stretchable Capacitive Strain Sensors by Hierarchical Auxetic Structures , 2019, Front. Robot. AI.

[11]  G. Xie,et al.  Two-sided topological architecture on monolithic flexible substrate for ultrasensitive strain sensors. , 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[12]  Jeong-Yun Sun,et al.  Auxetic elastomers: Mechanically programmable meta-elastomers with an unusual Poisson’s ratio overcome the gauge limit of a capacitive type strain sensor , 2019, Extreme Mechanics Letters.

[13]  A. Ameli,et al.  Highly-Loaded Thermoplastic Polyurethane/Lead Zirconate Titanate Composite Foams with Low Permittivity Fabricated using Expandable Microspheres , 2019, Polymers.

[14]  Massimo Totaro,et al.  Toward Perceptive Soft Robots: Progress and Challenges , 2018, Advanced science.

[15]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Ultrastretchable Strain Sensors Using Carbon Black‐Filled Elastomer Composites and Comparison of Capacitive Versus Resistive Sensors , 2018 .

[16]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Auxetic nail: Design and experimental study , 2018 .

[17]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Characterisation of cementitious polymer mortar – Auxetic foam composites , 2017 .

[18]  Bongkyun Jang,et al.  Graphene-Based Three-Dimensional Capacitive Touch Sensor for Wearable Electronics. , 2017, ACS nano.

[19]  Roderic S. Lakes,et al.  Negative-Poisson's-Ratio Materials: Auxetic Solids , 2017 .

[20]  Zhongqiu Wang,et al.  Auxetic Foam‐Based Contact‐Mode Triboelectric Nanogenerator with Highly Sensitive Self‐Powered Strain Sensing Capabilities to Monitor Human Body Movement , 2017 .

[21]  K. Bertoldi,et al.  Buckling-Induced Kirigami. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[22]  Martin Stockmann,et al.  25 years basic research in the field of strain gage technology on Chemnitz University of Technology - Institute of Mechanics , 2017 .

[23]  Manuel Collet,et al.  A piezo-shunted kirigami auxetic lattice for adaptive elastic wave filtering , 2016 .

[24]  Yan Li,et al.  On the successful fabrication of auxetic polyurethane foams: Materials requirement, processing strategy and conversion mechanism , 2016 .

[25]  Katia Bertoldi,et al.  Hierarchical honeycomb auxetic metamaterials , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[26]  D. Elata,et al.  Mass-fabrication compatible mechanism for converting in-plane to out-of-plane motion , 2015, 2015 28th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS).

[27]  M. Bruggi,et al.  Auxetic materials for MEMS: modeling, optimization and additive manufacturing , 2015 .

[28]  Umar Ansari,et al.  Review of Mechanics and Applications of Auxetic Structures , 2014 .

[29]  J. Wilde,et al.  Capacitive strain gauges on flexible polymer substrates for wireless, intelligent systems , 2014 .

[30]  S. Al-Hallaj,et al.  Modeling of compression curves of flexible polyurethane foam with variable density, chemical formulations and strain rates , 2014 .

[31]  Andrew Alderson,et al.  Auxetic Materials for Sports Applications , 2014 .

[32]  Rafat F. Al-Waked,et al.  Compression and Hysteresis Curves of Nonlinear Polyurethane Foams Under Different Densities, Strain Rates and Different Environmental Conditions , 2011 .

[33]  Hong Hu,et al.  A review on auxetic structures and polymeric materials , 2010 .

[34]  S. Kłysz,et al.  Flexible Auxetic Foams - Fabrication, Properties and Possible Application Areas , 2010 .

[35]  Hossein Saidpour,et al.  DMA Investigation on Polyurethane , 2008 .

[36]  F. Scarpa,et al.  Auxetic materials for bioprostheses [In the Spotlight] , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[37]  F. Scarpa,et al.  Some new considerations concerning the Rayleigh‐wave velocity in auxetic materials , 2008 .

[38]  F. Scarpa,et al.  Auxetic Materials for Bioprostheses , 2008 .

[39]  Uttam K. Chakravarty,et al.  Effect of density, microstructure, and strain rate on compression behavior of polymeric foams , 2005 .

[40]  Fabrizio Scarpa,et al.  Mechanical Performance of Auxetic Polyurethane Foam for Antivibration Glove Applications , 2005 .

[41]  A. Roy,et al.  Micromechanical modeling of three-dimensional open-cell foams using the matrix method for spatial frames , 2005 .

[42]  Zhong‐Ming Li,et al.  Review on auxetic materials , 2004 .

[43]  Joseph N. Grima,et al.  Auxetic polymeric filters display enhanced de-fouling and pressure compensation properties , 2001 .

[44]  A. Alderson.  A triumph of lateral thought , 1999 .

[45]  Kenneth E. Evans,et al.  Fabrication methods for auxetic foams , 1997 .

[46]  R. Lakes,et al.  Design of a fastener based on negative Poisson's ratio foam , 1991 .

[47]  J. B. Park,et al.  Negative Poisson's ratio polymeric and metallic foams , 1988 .