A clinical prototype for active microwave imaging of the breast

Despite its recognized value in detecting and characterizing breast disease, X-ray mammography has important limitations that motivate the quest for alternatives to augment the diagnostic tools that are currently available to the radiologist. The rationale for pursuing electromagnetic methods is strong given the data in the literature, which show that the electromagnetic properties of breast malignancy are significantly different than normal in the high megahertz to low gigahertz spectral range, microwave illumination can effectively penetrate the breast at these frequencies, and the breast is a small readily accessible tissue volume, making it an ideal site for deploying advanced near-field imaging concepts that exploit model-based image reconstruction methodology. In this paper a clinical prototype of a microwave imaging system, which actively illuminates the breast with a 16-element transceiving monopole antenna array in the 300-1000 MHz range, is reported. Microwave exams have been delivered to five women through a water-coupled interface to the pendant breast with the participant positioned prone on an examination table. This configuration has been found to be a practical, comfortable approach to microwave breast imaging. Sessions lasted 10-15 min per breast and included full tomographic data acquisition at seven different array heights beginning at the chest wall and moving anteriorly toward the nipple for seven different frequencies at each array position. This clinical experience appears to be the first report of active near-field microwave imaging of the breast and is certainly the first attempt to exploit model-based image reconstructions from in vivo breast data in order to convert the measured microwave signals into spatial maps of electrical permittivity and conductivity. While clearly preliminary, the results are encouraging and have supplied some interesting findings. Specifically, it appears that the average relative permittivity of the breast as a whole correlates with radiologic breast density categorization and may be considerably higher than previously published values, which have been based on ex vivo tissue specimens.

[1]  F. Gilliland,et al.  The New Mexico Mammography Project: Screening mammography performance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991 to 1993 , 1996, Cancer.

[2]  C. Pichot,et al.  Inverse scattering: an iterative numerical method for electromagnetic imaging , 1991 .

[3]  R J Bartrum,et al.  Transillumination lightscanning to diagnose breast cancer: a feasibility study. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  E. Yu,et al.  Infrared Imaging of the Breast: Initial Reappraisal Using High‐Resolution Digital Technology in 100 Successive Cases of Stage I and II Breast Cancer , 1998, The breast journal.

[5]  A. Taflove,et al.  Two-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: fixed-focus and antenna-array sensors , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  W. Joines,et al.  The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz. , 1994, Medical physics.

[7]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Craig A. Beam,et al.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  Elise C. Fear,et al.  Microwave system for breast tumor detection , 1999 .

[11]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. , 1998, Radiology.

[12]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. , 1993, Radiology.

[13]  Volker Barth,et al.  Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[14]  E A Sickles,et al.  Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  A. Taflove,et al.  Three-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: design of an antenna-array element , 1999 .

[16]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Near-field microwave imaging of biologically-based materials using a monopole transceiver system , 1998 .

[17]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Two-dimensional hybrid element image reconstruction for TM illumination , 1995 .

[18]  E A Sickles,et al.  Breast cancer detection with transillumination and mammography. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Ying Wang,et al.  Nonlinear diffraction tomography: The use of inverse scattering for imaging , 1996 .

[20]  E. Alanen,et al.  A dielectric method for measuring early and late reactions in irradiated human skin. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  Paul M. Meaney,et al.  Nonactive antenna compensation for fixed-array microwave imaging. I. Model development , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  J. Wolfe Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. , 1976, Radiology.

[23]  C. Beam,et al.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  R W Blamey,et al.  An evaluation of transmission spectroscopy (lightscanning) in the diagnosis of symptomatic breast lesions. , 1987, Clinical radiology.

[25]  D. R. White,et al.  Average soft-tissue and bone models for use in radiation dosimetry. , 1987, The British journal of radiology.

[26]  Dominique Lesselier,et al.  On the inverse source method of solving inverse scattering problems , 1994 .

[27]  Matteo Pastorino,et al.  Reconstruction of dielectric permittivity distributions in arbitrary 2-D inhomogeneous biological bodies by a multiview microwave numerical method , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[28]  C. Pichot,et al.  Microwave imaging-complex permittivity reconstruction with a Levenberg-Marquardt method , 1997 .

[29]  Ann Franchois,et al.  Quantitative microwave imaging with a 2.45-GHz planar microwave camera , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  D. R. White,et al.  The composition of body tissues. , 1986, The British journal of radiology.

[31]  L. Tabár,et al.  Reproductive and menstrual factors in relation to mammographic parenchymal patterns among perimenopausal women. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  S. Taplin,et al.  Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  P.M. Meaney,et al.  Microwave imaging for tissue assessment: initial evaluation in multitarget tissue-equivalent phantoms , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  P. Huynh,et al.  The false-negative mammogram. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[35]  A. Devaney,et al.  Super-resolution in diffraction tomography , 1992 .

[36]  P. Stomper,et al.  Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  S. S. Chaudhary,et al.  Dielectric properties of normal & malignant human breast tissues at radiowave & microwave frequencies. , 1984, Indian journal of biochemistry & biophysics.

[38]  G. E. Geslien,et al.  Transillumination in breast cancer detection: screening failures and potential. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  A. Oza,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[40]  S. Sengupta,et al.  Thermography: Its relation to pathologic characteristics, vascularity, proliferation rate, and survival of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast , 1996, Cancer.

[41]  Mario Bertero,et al.  Resolution and super-resolution in inverse diffraction , 1997 .

[42]  F Merletti,et al.  The relation of mammographic features of the breast to breast cancer risk factors. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[43]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[44]  Paul M. Meaney,et al.  Nonactive antenna compensation for fixed-array microwave imaging. II. Imaging results , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[45]  P.M. Meaney,et al.  An active microwave imaging system for reconstruction of 2-D electrical property distributions , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Conjugate-gradient algorithm with edge-preserving regularization for image reconstruction from Ipswi , 1997 .

[47]  E. Frei,et al.  Breast cancer screening by impedance measurements. , 1990, Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering.