Resistant starch type 4-enriched diet lowered blood cholesterols and improved body composition in a double blind controlled cross-over intervention.

A metabolic health crisis is evident as cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of mortality in the United States. Effects of resistant starch type 4 (RS4), a prebiotic fiber, in comprehensive management of metabolic syndrome (MetS) remain unknown. This study examined the effects of a blinded exchange of RS4-enriched flour (30% v/v) with regular/control flour (CF) diet on multiple MetS comorbidities. In a double blind (participants-investigators), placebo-controlled, cluster cross-over intervention (n = 86, age≥18, 2-12 week interventions, 2-week washout) in the United States, individuals were classified as having MetS (With-MetS) or not (No-MetS) following International Diabetes Federation (IDF)-criteria. RS4 consumption compared with CF resulted in 7.2% (p = 0.002) lower mean total cholesterol, 5.5% (p = 0.04) lower non-HDL, and a 12.8% (p < 0.001) lower HDL cholesterol in the With-MetS group. No-MetS individuals had a 2.6% (p = 0.02) smaller waist circumference and 1.5% (p = 0.03) lower percent body fat following RS4 intervention compared to CF. A small but significant 1% increase in fat-free mass was observed in all participants combined (p = 0.02). No significant effect of RS4 was observed for glycemic variables and blood pressures. RS4 consumption improved dyslipidemia and body composition. Incorporation of RS4 in routine diets could offer an effective strategy for public cardio-metabolic health promotion.

[1]  G. Prasad,et al.  Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using NCEP-ATPIII, IDF and WHO Definition and Its Agreement in Gwalior Chambal Region of Central India , 2013, Global journal of health science.

[2]  M. Maziarz,et al.  Sensory characteristics of high-amylose maize-resistant starch in three food products , 2012, Food science & nutrition.

[3]  John Spertus,et al.  Plasma HDL cholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: a mendelian randomisation study , 2012, The Lancet.

[4]  G. Norman,et al.  Dietary fiber and nutrient density are inversely associated with the metabolic syndrome in US adolescents. , 2011, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[5]  T. Binkley,et al.  Cross-sectional versus longitudinal associations of lean and fat mass with pQCT bone outcomes in children. , 2011, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[6]  Jaehyoung Kim,et al.  Resistant Starches Types 2 and 4 Have Differential Effects on the Composition of the Fecal Microbiota in Human Subjects , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  D. van der A,et al.  Dietary fiber and subsequent changes in body weight and waist circumference in European men and women. , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  Kelcie Hubach,et al.  Different Types of Resistant Starch Elicit Different Glucose Reponses in Humans , 2010, Journal of nutrition and metabolism.

[9]  W. Cefalu,et al.  Butyrate Improves Insulin Sensitivity and Increases Energy Expenditure in Mice , 2009, Diabetes.

[10]  P. Raskin,et al.  Metabolic effects of carvedilol vs metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[11]  P. Deurenberg,et al.  Limited effect of consumption of uncooked (RS2) or retrograded (RS3) resistant starch on putative risk factors for colon cancer in healthy men. , 1998, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[12]  H. Englyst,et al.  Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. , 1992, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  S. Yoo,et al.  The effect of chemically-modified resistant starch, RS type-4, on body weight and blood lipid profiles of high fat diet-induced obese mice† , 2012 .

[14]  B. Rosner,et al.  Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis. , 1999, The American journal of clinical nutrition.