Reconstruction of a Deformed Tumor Based on Fiducial Marker Registration: A Computational Feasibility Study

Interstitial photodynamic therapy has shown promising results in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. In this therapy, systemic administration of a light-sensitive drug is followed by insertion of multiple laser fibers to illuminate the tumor and its margins. Image-based pretreatment planning is employed in order to deliver a sufficient light dose to the complex locally advanced head-and-neck cancer anatomy, in order to meet clinical requirements. Unfortunately, the tumor may deform between pretreatment imaging for the purpose of planning and intraoperative imaging when the plan is executed. Tumor deformation may result from the mechanical forces applied by the light fibers and variation of the patient’s posture. Pretreatment planning is frequently done with the assistance of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in an outpatient suite, while treatment monitoring and control typically uses ultrasound imaging due to considerations of costs and availability in the operation room. This article presents a computational method designed to bridge the gap between the 2 imaging events by taking a tumor geometry, reconstructed during preplanning, and by following the displacement of fiducial markers, which are initially placed during the preplanning procedure. The deformed tumor shape is predicted by solving an inverse problem, seeking for the forces that would have resulted in the corresponding fiducial marker displacements. The computational method is studied on spheres of variable sizes and demonstrated on computed tomography reconstructed locally advanced head and neck cancer model. Results of this study demonstrate an average error of less than 1 mm in predicting the deformed tumor shape, where 1 mm is typically the order of uncertainty in distance measurements using magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography imaging and high-quality ultrasound imaging. This study further demonstrates that the deformed shape can be calculated in a few seconds, making the proposed method clinically relevant.

[1]  Johannes Swartling,et al.  Realtime light dosimetry software tools for interstitial photodynamic therapy of the human prostate. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods , 1997 .

[3]  T Theodossy,et al.  Interstitial photodynamic therapy as salvage treatment for recurrent head and neck cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  FEM-Based 3-D Tumor Growth Prediction for Kidney Tumor , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  B. Wilson,et al.  The physics, biophysics and technology of photodynamic therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Timothy M. Baran,et al.  Image-Guided Treatment Planning and Dosimetry for Interstitial Photodynamic Therapy , 2012 .

[7]  R. Cendales,et al.  Displacements of fiducial markers in patients with prostate cancer treated with image guided radiotherapy: A single-institution descriptive study. , 2015, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[8]  Timothy C Zhu,et al.  Determination of in vivo light fluence distribution in a heterogeneous prostate during photodynamic therapy , 2008, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[9]  Jarod C Finlay,et al.  Interstitial Fluorescence Spectroscopy in the Human Prostate During Motexafin Lutetium–Mediated Photodynamic Therapy , 2006, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[10]  W. Jerjes,et al.  The surgical palliation of advanced head and neck cancer using photodynamic therapy. , 2010, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[11]  K. Thursky,et al.  Patient-reported complications from fiducial marker implantation for prostate image-guided radiotherapy. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  I. Tan,et al.  MR and CT based treatment planning for mTHPC mediated interstitial photodynamic therapy of head and neck cancer: Description of the method , 2013, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[13]  C. Hopper,et al.  MR imaging-guided interstitial photodynamic laser therapy for advanced head and neck tumors. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  Stefan Andersson-Engels,et al.  System for interstitial photodynamic therapy with online dosimetry: first clinical experiences of prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  W. Jerjes,et al.  Prospective evaluation of 110 patients following ultrasound-guided photodynamic therapy for deep seated pathologies. , 2011, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.

[16]  Ulrich Pinkall,et al.  Computing Discrete Minimal Surfaces and Their Conjugates , 1993, Exp. Math..

[17]  Gal Shafirstein,et al.  A new finite element approach for near real‐time simulation of light propagation in locally advanced head and neck tumors , 2015, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[18]  K. Bathe.  Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[19]  Timothy M Baran,et al.  Comparison of flat cleaved and cylindrical diffusing fibers as treatment sources for interstitial photodynamic therapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[20]  N. Lawrentschuk,et al.  Fiducial markers and spacers in prostate radiotherapy: current applications , 2014, BJU international.

[21]  João Manuel R S Tavares,et al.  Medical image registration: a review , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[22]  I. Tan,et al.  mTHPC mediated interstitial photodynamic therapy of recurrent nonmetastatic base of tongue cancers: Development of a new method , 2012, Head & neck.

[23]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  David Kessel,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[25]  S B Malkowicz,et al.  Preliminary results of interstitial motexafin lutetium‐mediated PDT for prostate cancer , 2006, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[26]  Robert A Weersink,et al.  Treatment planning and dose analysis for interstitial photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  M. Metzger,et al.  Comparison of virtual and titanium clip marking of tumour resection margins for improved radiation planning in head and neck cancer surgery. , 2015, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[28]  S. Rosenberg.  The Laplacian on a Riemannian Manifold: An Introduction to Analysis on Manifolds , 1997 .

[29]  Keenan Crane,et al.  Digital geometry processing with discrete exterior calculus , 2013, SIGGRAPH '13.

[30]  Amy Y Chen,et al.  The importance of margins in head and neck cancer , 2016, Journal of surgical oncology.

[31]  Nikos Chrisochoides,et al.  A Parallel Adaptive Physics-Based Non-rigid Registration Framework for Brain Tumor Resection , 2014, CompIMAGE.

[32]  Mark Meyer,et al.  Implicit fairing of irregular meshes using diffusion and curvature flow , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[33]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Tumor Growth Prediction with Hyperelastic Biomechanical Model, Physiological Data Fusion, and Nonlinear Optimization , 2014, MICCAI.

[34]  Maryam Azimi,et al.  Geometrical analysis and predictive modeling of head and neck tumors , 2014, 2014 World Automation Congress (WAC).