Patterns of Web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people

Web 2.0 tools have gained strategic importance in personal, social and educational contexts. In this study, we analysed the use made by 757 Spanish students of 10 Web 2.0 tools, namely wikis, blogs, Moodle, Google Docs, Google Reader, Google Maps, Skype, Flickr, YouTube and general or personal social networks. To this end, we administered an online questionnaire, the HEWE2.0, designed using the Google Docs application, to explore five questions: (i) what information, knowledge and training the subjects had, (ii) how they used the tools: difficulty, preference and satisfaction, (iii) when and where they used them, (iv) why they had begun to use them, and (v) what they used them for. We performed two types of analysis, one descriptive and the other multivariate, using the General Linear Model. The results show specific patterns of response according to sex, educational level and age. We found that female subjects showed a greater preference for social tools than males, who preferred instrumental tools; that the higher the subjects' educational level, the more information they possessed about Web 2.0 tools; and that functional knowledge about those tools requiring greater digital competence increased with age and vice versa. The implications of these results are discussed and evaluated. The variables that influence the use made of Web 2.0 tools by young people were studied and analysed.Young Spanish people are more familiar with YouTube than other Web 2.0 tools such as wikis or blogs.Vocational education and training students have received most information and formal training on Web 2.0 tools.Males have a higher level of functional knowledge of Google tools than females.Females report a greater intention to use YouTube and social networks in the future than males.

[1]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[2]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Social networking websites and teens: an overview , 2007 .

[3]  Marlene Asselin,et al.  The Participatory Classroom: Web 2.0 in the Classroom , 2011 .

[4]  Elvira Popescu Students' Acceptance of Web 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education: Findings from a Survey in a Romanian University , 2010, 2010 Workshops on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[5]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[6]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[8]  Joseph A. Salem,et al.  No Natives Here: A Focus Group Study of Student Perceptions of Web 2.0 and the Academic Library , 2009 .

[9]  Ramadan Eyyam,et al.  Perceptions of teacher candidates towards Web 2.0 technologies , 2011 .

[10]  Reynol Junco,et al.  The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Wendy Ceccucci,et al.  Web 2.0 matters: An analysis of implementing web 2.0 in the classroom , 2008 .

[12]  Alan J. Cann,et al.  Observing Emerging Student Networks on a Microblogging Service , 2011 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[14]  Reynol Junco,et al.  Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  David Cobham,et al.  Undergraduate students: Interactive, online experiences and ePortfolio development , 2011, 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks.

[16]  Caroline F. Timmers,et al.  Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Mark Frydenberg Wikis as a Tool for Collaborative Course Management , 2008 .

[18]  S. G. Mazman,et al.  Gender Differences in Using Social Networks. , 2011 .

[19]  Lindsay H. Hoffman,et al.  All the news that's fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[21]  J. M. Cerezo,et al.  Web 2.0 , 2010 .

[22]  Judy Skene,et al.  Using Web 2.0 Tools to Enhance the Student Experience in Non-Teaching Areas of the University , 2011 .

[23]  Johannes Moskaliuk,et al.  "Actually, I Wanted to Learn": Study-related knowledge exchange on social networking sites , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students , 2009 .

[25]  Patricia Sendall,et al.  Faculty Research and Development in the Technology Disciplines , 2008 .

[26]  T. Bosch Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town , 2009 .

[27]  Christine Greenhow Online social networks and learning , 2011 .

[28]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Age differences in online social networking - A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Yasemin Koçak Usluel,et al.  Modeling educational usage of Facebook , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Ercan Top,et al.  Blogging as a social medium in undergraduate courses: Sense of community best predictor of perceived learning , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[31]  J. Meek,et al.  Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’ , 2009 .

[32]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings , 2007 .

[33]  Sandra L. Calvert,et al.  College students' social networking experiences on Facebook , 2009 .

[34]  Nicoletta Corrocher,et al.  The adoption of Web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation , 2011 .

[35]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Supporting Small-Group Learning Using Multiple Web 2.0 Tools: A Case Study in the Higher Education Context. , 2012 .

[36]  Guillermo Sandoval,et al.  Modeling student's learning styles in web 2.0 learning systems , 2009 .

[37]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..