Web-based software-support for collaborative morphological analysis in real-time

Existing software and procedures for General Morphological Analysis (GMA) are primarily designed for synchronous face-to-face meetings. However, virtual teams and telework are on the rise. Against this background, we analyze current approaches and IT support to identify aspects that need to be reconsidered when GMA is applied in a distributed setting. In cooperation with a German non-profit cultural organization, we have developed browser-based collaborative GMA software that provides multi-user support. This paper presents what we have learned from the development process and the results from two empirical studies on the usability and learnability of the developed software. Based on observations and user feedback from the empirical studies, we conclude that the developed software is a useful IT artefact; more research is needed, however, to investigate the implications of distributed team settings for the application and facilitation of GMA.

[1]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  André L. Delbecq,et al.  A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning , 1971 .

[4]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Team learning: building shared mental models , 2011 .

[5]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: a retrospective , 2013 .

[6]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  A conceptual foundation of the thinkLet concept for Collaboration Engineering , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale , 2009, HCI.

[8]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  SUBGROUP DYNAMICS IN INTERNATIONALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS: ETHNOCENTRISM OR CROSS-NATIONAL LEARNING? , 2004 .

[9]  Peter R.N. Childs,et al.  Using morphological analysis to tackle uncertainty at the design phase for a safety critical application , 2015 .

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[11]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[12]  Geoff Coyle.  Practical Strategy: Structured tools and techniques , 2004 .

[13]  T. Ritchey,et al.  Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Stefano Federici,et al.  On the dimensionality of the System Usability Scale: a test of alternative measurement models , 2009, Cognitive Processing.

[15]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[16]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[17]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  Memic: An Interactive Morphological Matrix Tool for Automated Concept Generation , 2008 .

[18]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Towards a Process Model for Computer-Supported Collaborative Morphological Analysis , 2015, AMCIS.

[19]  Detlef Schoder,et al.  Information Systems for “Wicked Problems” , 2014, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[20]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[21]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[22]  Tom Ritchey,et al.  Wicked Problems – Social Messes , 2011 .

[23]  Joseph Voros,et al.  Morphological prospection: profiling the shapes of things to come , 2009 .

[24]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[25]  F. Zwicky,et al.  Entdecken - Erfinden - Forschen im morphologischen Weltbild , 1971 .

[26]  Gary M. Olson,et al.  Solving Wicked Social Problems with Socio-computational Systems , 2013, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

[27]  F. Zwicky.  Discovery, Invention, Research through the morphological approach , 1969 .

[28]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[29]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .