Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant Design and Orientation

&NA; Implant design and positioning are important factors in maintaining stability and minimizing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of modular femoral stems and acetabular implants increased the number of head, neck, and liner designs, the features of recent designs can cause intra‐articular prosthetic impingement within the arc of motion required for normal daily activities and thus lead to limited motion, increased wear, osteolysis, and subluxation or dislocation. Minimizing impingement involves avoiding skirted heads, matching a 22‐mm head with an appropriate acetabular implant, maximizing the head‐to‐neck ratio, and, when possible, using a chamfered acetabular liner and a trapezoidal, rather than circular, neck cross‐section. Computer modeling studies indicate the optimal cup position is 45° to 55° abduction. Angles <55° require anteversion of 10° to 20° of both the stem and cup to minimize the risk of impingement and dislocation.

[1]  S. Kelley,et al.  The Influence of Patient-Related Factors and the Position of the Acetabular Component on the Rate of Dislocation after Total Hip Replacement* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  The effect of component design on range of motion to impingement in total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.

[3]  H. Fredin,et al.  Dislocations and the Femoral Head Size in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  W H Harris,et al.  Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty. The impact of modular head-neck components. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Robert L. Barrack,et al.  Modularity of Prosthetic Implants , 1994, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[6]  R. Barrack,et al.  Surgeon work input and risk in primary versus revision total joint arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  B. Wroblewski,et al.  Revision of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty for recurrent or irreducible dislocation. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  R. Barrack,et al.  Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[9]  T D Brown,et al.  A Finite Element Analysis of Factors Influencing Total Hip Dislocation , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  D. D’Lima,et al.  The Effect of the Orientation of the Acetabular and Femoral Components on the Range of Motion of the Hip at Different Head-Neck Ratios* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  D R Laster,et al.  Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  A. Cotten,et al.  Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  M. Seki,et al.  Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer‐aided design simulation , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  H. Fredin,et al.  Patient characteristics in dislocations after primary total hip arthroplasty. 60 patients compared with a control group. , 1995, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  W H Harris,et al.  Elevated-rim acetabular components. Effect on range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  R. Robinson,et al.  Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  P J Gregg,et al.  Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England: the results at five years from a regional hip register. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  R. Beckenbaugh,et al.  2,012 total hip arthroplasties. A study of postoperative course and early complications. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  B. Morrey,et al.  Effect of the Elevated-Rim Acetabular Liner on Loosening after Total Hip Arthroplasty* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  D. Pedersen,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a single surgeon's experience. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[22]  Philip C. Noble,et al.  The Effect of Femoral Component Head Size on Posterior Dislocation of the Artificial Hip Joint* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  Robert Poss,et al.  Posterior Approach to Total Hip Replacement Using Enhanced Posterior Soft Tissue Repair , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  H. Fredin,et al.  Surgical experience related to dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  B F Morrey,et al.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Polyethylene Wear After Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Effect of a Modular Femoral Head with an Extended Flange-Reinforced Neck* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  B M Wroblewski,et al.  The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  S. Kelley,et al.  Relationship of Femoral Head and Acetabular Size to the Prevalence of Dislocation , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  B F Morrey,et al.  The Elevated-Rim Acetabular Liner in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relationship to Postoperative Dislocation* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  T. Bauer,et al.  The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  D. McCollum,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  Å. Carlsson,et al.  Increased risk of dislocation with collar reinforced modular heads of the Lubinus SP-2 hip prosthesis. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[33]  W. J. Daum,et al.  Can simple radiographs be predictive of total hip dislocation? , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[34]  R. Poss,et al.  Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  B F Morrey,et al.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[36]  T. Wright,et al.  Dislocation following THA: comparison of two acetabular component designs. , 1993, Orthopedics.