MuSET: A multiparameter and high precision sensor for downhole spontaneous electrical potential measurements

Abstract On the basis of an existing multiparameter borehole fluid sensor (p, T, Cw, pH, Eh), a new downhole tool designed for 200 bars and 75 °C was developed to measure the spontaneous electrical potential in situ with great precision (better than a μV). To this end, the new sensor is based on the use of unpolarizable Pb/PbCl2 electrodes either at the surface or downhole. In situ testing has demonstrated a capacity to identify several subsurface sources of natural electrical potential such as diffusion ones (membrane potential in the presence of clays, Fickian processes due to pore fluid salinity gradients), or else the electrokinetic mechanisms with gradients in pore fluid pressure. As a consequence, Multi-Sensors Electrical Tool (MuSET) might be used as an “electrical flowmeter” sensitive to both horizontal and vertical fluid flow in a vertical borehole.

[1]  Shingo Yoshida,et al.  Electric potential changes associated with slip failure of granite: Preseismic and coseismic signals , 1997 .

[2]  André Revil,et al.  Principles of electrography applied to self‐potential electrokinetic sources and hydrogeological applications , 2003 .

[3]  Y. Bernabé,et al.  Electrical Response of Flow, Diffusion, and Advection in a Laboratory Sand Box , 2004 .

[4]  P. Glover,et al.  Streaming potential in porous media: 1. Theory of the zeta potential , 1999 .

[5]  S. Whitaker,et al.  Electrohydrodynamics in Porous Media , 2001 .

[6]  Frederick L. Paillet,et al.  A Field Technique for Estimating Aquifer Parameters Using Flow Log Data , 2000 .

[7]  T. Ishido,et al.  Experimental and theoretical basis of electrokinetic phenomena in rock‐water systems and its applications to geophysics , 1981 .

[8]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Fluid flow near reservoir lakes inferred from the spatial and temporal analysis of the electric potential , 2002 .

[9]  Olivier Bour,et al.  Comparison of alternative methodologies for identifying and characterizing preferential flow paths in heterogeneous aquifers , 2007 .

[10]  Y. Maria-Sube.  Structure et hétérogénéité d'une plate-forme récifale Miocène (Majorque) ; implication pour les intrusions d'eau salée en zone côtière , 2007 .

[11]  Francis S. Birch,et al.  Imaging the Water Table by Filtering Self‐Potential Profiles , 1998 .

[12]  Hideki Mizunaga,et al.  Reservoir monitoring by a 4-D electrical technique , 1999 .

[13]  John W. Pritchett,et al.  Numerical simulation of electrokinetic potentials associated with subsurface fluid flow , 1996 .

[14]  Kenzo Baba,et al.  Streaming potential observations, using geothermal wells and in situ electrokinetic coupling coefficients under high temperature , 1983 .

[15]  J. Zlotnicki,et al.  Possible electrokinetic origin of large magnetic variations at La Fournaise volcano , 1990, Nature.

[16]  J. Leckie,et al.  Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface , 1978 .

[17]  F. D. Morgan,et al.  Streaming potential properties of westerly granite with applications , 1989 .

[18]  L. Jouniaux,et al.  Laboratory measurements anomalous 0.1–0.5 Hz streaming potential under geochemical changes: Implications for electrotelluric precursors to earthquakes , 1997 .

[19]  Pascal Sailhac,et al.  Electrical Streaming Potential Measured at the Ground Surface: Forward Modeling and Inversion Issues for Monitoring Infiltration and Characterizing the Vadose Zone , 2004 .

[20]  R. Corwin,et al.  The self-potential method in geothermal exploration , 1979 .

[21]  J. Zlotnicki,et al.  Self-potential and magnetic surveying of La Fournaise volcano (Réunion Island): Correlations with faulting, fluid circulation, and eruption , 1998 .

[22]  J. Avouac,et al.  Streaming potential measurements 1. Properties of the electrical double layer from crushed rock samples , 1999 .

[23]  Philip H. Nelson,et al.  Well logging for physical properties , 1985 .

[24]  Stefan M. Luthi,et al.  Geological Well Logs: Their Use in Reservoir Modeling , 2001 .

[25]  Darwin V. Ellis,et al.  Well Logging for Earth Scientists , 1987 .

[26]  André Revil,et al.  Groundwater redox conditions and conductivity in a contaminant plume from geoelectrical investigations , 2004 .

[27]  P. Sailhac,et al.  Hydraulic stimulation of geothermal reservoirs: fluid flow, electric potential and microseismicity relationships , 2006 .

[28]  G. Petiau.  Second Generation of Lead-lead Chloride Electrodes for Geophysical Applications , 2000 .

[29]  Laurence Jouniaux,et al.  Streaming potential of a sand column in partial saturation conditions , 2003 .

[30]  Salvatore Straface,et al.  Self‐potential signals associated with pumping tests experiments , 2004 .

[31]  M. Aubert,et al.  Self potential generated by two‐phase flow in a porous medium: Experimental study and volcanological applications , 1993 .

[32]  Alfred E. Hess,et al.  Identifying hydraulically conductive fractures with a slow-velocity borehole flowmeter , 1986 .

[33]  Yasunori Nishida,et al.  Review on Morphological Insights of Self-Potential Anomalies on Volcanoes , 2003 .

[34]  P. Sailhac,et al.  Surface electric variations induced by deep hydraulic stimulation: An example from the Soultz HDR site , 2002, Geophysical Research Letters.

[35]  Alexis Maineult,et al.  On the origins of self‐potential (SP) anomalies induced by water injections into geothermal reservoirs , 2004 .

[36]  J. Avouac,et al.  Radon emanation and electric potential variations associated with transient deformation near reservoir lakes , 1999, Nature.

[37]  M. Johnston,et al.  Review of Electric and Magnetic Fields Accompanying Seismic and Volcanic Activity , 1997 .

[38]  Frederick L. Paillet,et al.  Using flowmeter pulse tests to define hydraulic connections in the subsurface: a fractured shale example , 2002 .