Material Classification of Underground Utilities From GPR Images Using DCT-Based SVM Approach

In this letter, we introduce the utilization of discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients as features supplied to the support vector machine (SVM) classifier to identify underground utility material from ground penetrating radar (GPR) imagery. Different types of features, reflected signal amplitudes, and statistical features, combined with the SVM classifier for material identification of underground utilities, are also studied and compared to the DCT-based approach. The system performance is conducted by simulation studies using generated GPR images created by a GPR finite-difference time-domain-based simulator used to develop various acquisition situations by changing the utility material type, position, and size parameters. The efficiency of the proposed technique in material identification is assessed using noisy generated GPR images degraded with speckle noise. Two-dimensional median and adaptive Wiener filters are also examined as a preprocessing step to the studied techniques. Simulation results show that the proposed technique combined with adaptive Wiener filter reveals a good performance regarding the recognition accuracy compared to the other studied techniques in noisy environment.

[1]  Serena Matucci,et al.  The Detection of Buried Pipes From Time-of-Flight Radar Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Fathi E. Abd El-Samie,et al.  Detection of landmines and underground utilities from acoustic and GPR images with a cepstral approach , 2010, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[3]  P.A. Torrione,et al.  Performance of an adaptive feature-based processor for a wideband ground penetrating radar system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  L. Capineri,et al.  3-D radar imaging of buried utilities by features estimation of hyperbolic diffraction patterns in radar scans , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[5]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[6]  Mansor Nakhkash,et al.  Automatic detection of buried utilities and solid objects with GPR using neural networks and pattern recognition , 2000 .

[7]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[8]  Chi-Chih Chen,et al.  Automatic GPR target detection and clutter reduction using neural network , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[9]  Farid Melgani,et al.  Automatic Analysis of GPR Images: A Pattern-Recognition Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Chih Sung Chen,et al.  Adaptive filtering of random noise in near-surface seismic and ground-penetrating radar data , 2009 .

[11]  Antonios Giannopoulos,et al.  Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax , 2005 .

[12]  Evert Slob,et al.  Comparing detection and location performance of perpendicular and parallel broadside GPR antenna orientations , 2010 .

[13]  Jorge Herbert de Lira,et al.  Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing , 1989 .

[14]  Kristin P. Bennett,et al.  Support vector machines: hype or hallelujah? , 2000, SKDD.

[15]  Yi Huang,et al.  Neural network target identifier based on statistical features of GPR signals , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.