Using a constellation of CubeSats for in-space optical 3D scanning

The assessment of in-space objects is an area of ongoing research. Characterization of resident space objects (RSOs) can be useful for assessing the operating status of operator-affiliated or non-affiliated space assets, identifying unknown objects or gathering additional details for known objects. Under the proposed approach, a ring-like constellation of CubeSats passes around the target (at a distance) collecting imagery. This imagery is then utilized to create a 3D model of the target. This paper considers several key elements of a constellation to perform this type of imaging, including the constellation design and imaging capabilities required and the astrodynamics relevant to maintaining formation. A discussion of the impact of the locations of the lighting sources is presented and the utility of this data for a variety of applications is assessed. Analysis of simulated test data is discussed.

[1]  S. Gregory,et al.  Fingerprinting of Non-resolved Three-axis Stabilized Space Objects Using a Two-Facet Analytical Model , 2011 .

[2]  Alexander Robin Mercantini Ghosh,et al.  Building Engineers: A 15-Year Case Study in CubeSat Education , 2016 .

[3]  Robert J. Twiggs,et al.  Thinking Out of the Box : Space Science Beyond the CubeSat , 2012 .

[4]  Albert Tsuda,et al.  Rapid Development using Tyvak’s Open Source Software Model , 2013 .

[5]  Xie Hongquan,et al.  Status and development trend of 3D laser scanning technology in the mining field , 2013 .

[6]  Aubrey B. Poore,et al.  Multiple Hypothesis Tracking (MHT) for Space Surveillance: Results and Simulation Studies , 2013 .

[7]  Michael Taraba,et al.  Boeing's CubeSat TestBed 1 Attitude Determination Design and On­Orbit Experience , 2009 .

[8]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  Formation flying within a constellation of nano-satellites: The QB50 mission , 2010 .

[9]  Mark Campbell,et al.  CubeSat design for LEO-based Earth science missions , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[10]  Michael Swartwout.  The Long-Threatened Flood of University-Class Spacecraft (and CubeSats) Has Come: Analyzing the Numbers , 2013 .

[11]  Linda Nesi,et al.  The use of 3D laser scanning technology in buildings archaeology: the case of Måketorpsboden in Kulturen museum, Lund , 2013 .

[12]  Jordi Puig-Suari,et al.  CubeSat: A New Generation of Picosatellite for Education and Industry Low-Cost Space Experimentation , 2000 .

[13]  K. N. Dollman,et al.  - 1 , 1743 .

[14]  Avi Pfeffer,et al.  Towards an Artificial Space Object Taxonomy , 2013 .

[15]  Jeremy Bailey,et al.  A CubeSat Mission for Exoplanet Transit Detection and Asteroseismology , 2012 .

[16]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  OpenOrbiter: A Low-Cost, Educational Prototype CubeSat Mission Architecture , 2013 .

[17]  Jeremy Straub.  CubeSats: A Low-Cost, Very High-Return Space Technology , 2012 .

[18]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Earth impactors: threat analysis and multistage intervention mission architecture , 2012, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[19]  Michael Groenendyk,et al.  A Further Investigation into 3D Printing and 3D Scanning at the Dalhousie University Libraries: a Year Long Case Study , 2013 .

[20]  Tim Luu,et al.  Space shuttle testing of the TriDAR 3D rendezvous and docking sensor , 2012, J. Field Robotics.

[21]  J. Pereira do Carmo,et al.  Imaging lidar technology: development of a 3D-lidar elegant breadboard for rendezvous and docking, test results, and prospect to future sensor application , 2017, International Conference on Space Optics.

[22]  P. Axelrad,et al.  Improved Estimation of Orbits and Physical Properties of Objects in GEO , 2013 .

[23]  Jesper A. Larsen,et al.  Development of cubesats in an educational context , 2011, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies - RAST2011.

[24]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Development of a Large, Low-Cost, Instant 3D Scanner , 2014 .

[25]  J. J. Degnan.  A conceptual design for a spaceborne 3D imaging lidar , 2002 .

[26]  Sanda Nas,et al.  ASPECTS REGARDING 3D LASER SCANNING SURVEYS FOR ROAD DESIGN , 2013 .

[27]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  The open prototype for educational NanoSats: Fixing the other side of the small satellite cost equation , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[28]  Paul V. Anderson,et al.  Local Orbital Debris Flux Study in the Geostationary Ring , 2012 .

[29]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  An Assessment of Educational Benefits from the OpenOrbiter Space Program , 2013 .

[30]  Galina Bogdanova,et al.  Digitization and 3D Scanning of Historical Artifacts , 2013, Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage.

[31]  Robert D. Habbit,et al.  3D scannerless LADAR for Orbiter inspection , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[32]  James Cutler,et al.  OPAL: Smaller, Simpler, and Just Plain Luckier , 2000 .

[33]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Evaluation of the Educational Impact of Participation Time in a Small Spacecraft Development Program , 2014 .

[34]  Robert J. Twiggs,et al.  Thinking Outside the Box: Space Science Beyond the CubeSat , 2012 .

[35]  Henry R. Hertzfeld,et al.  Cubesats: Cost-effective science and technology platforms for emerging and developing nations , 2011 .

[36]  David J. Weeks,et al.  The First US Army Satellite in Fifty Years: SMDC-ONE First Flight Results , 2011 .

[37]  Stephane Ruel,et al.  On-Orbit Testing of Target-less TriDAR 3D Rendezvous and Docking Sensor , 2010 .

[38]  Paul V. Anderson,et al.  Local debris congestion in the geosynchronous environment with population augmentation , 2013 .

[39]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  APPLICATION OF COLLABORATIVE AUTONOMOUS CONTROL AND THE OPEN PROTOTYPE FOR EDUCATIONAL NANOSATS FRAMEWORK TO ENABLE ORBITAL CAPABILITIES FOR DEVELOPING NATIONS , 2013 .

[40]  Paul David McCall.  Modeling, simulation, and characterization of space debris in low-Earth orbit , 2013 .

[41]  M. Moosavi,et al.  An Investigation of Surface Roughness Measurement in Rock Joints with a 3D Scanning Device , 2013 .