Modulation control over ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: evaluating the importance of standing waves.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nobuki Kudo | Peter Riesz | Yukihiro Furusawa | Ryohei Ogawa | T. Kondo | N. Kudo | P. Riesz | Yukihiro Furusawa | M. Hassan | Takashi Kondo | R. Ogawa | Mariame A Hassan | Mikhail A Buldakov | Qing-Li Zhao | M. Buldakov | Qinglei Zhao
[1] E. Shimoni,et al. Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy , 2006, Gene Therapy.
[2] Manabu Kinoshita,et al. Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
[3] E. vanBavel,et al. Effects of shear stress on endothelial cells: possible relevance for ultrasound applications. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.
[4] M. Prausnitz,et al. Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[5] Jeffrey C Bamber,et al. Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[6] Jindrich Kopecek,et al. Prospects for cationic polymers in gene and oligonucleotide therapy against cancer. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[7] M. Shieh,et al. The effects of power on–off durations of pulsed ultrasound on the destruction of cancer cells , 2007, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.
[8] Nico de Jong,et al. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.
[9] Morton W. Miller,et al. Pulsed Enhancement of acoustic cavitation: a postulated model. , 1981, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[10] K. Tachibana,et al. Optimized ultrasound‐mediated gene transfection in cancer cells , 2006, Cancer science.
[11] F Dunn,et al. Selective clinical ultrasound signals mediate differential gene transfer and expression in two human prostate cancer cell lines: LnCap and PC-3. , 1997, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
[12] A. Henglein,et al. Sonochemistry : historical developments and modern aspects , 1987 .
[13] N. Amso,et al. Fluorescein isothiocynate-dextran uptake by chinese hamster ovary cells in a 1.5 MHz ultrasonic standing wave in the presence of contrast agent. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[14] D. Burgess,et al. DNA-based therapeutics and DNA delivery systems: A comprehensive review , 2005, The AAPS Journal.
[15] Pai-Chi Li,et al. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[16] Shao-ling Huang,et al. Liposomes in ultrasonic drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[17] Yukio Tomita,et al. Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[18] Cheri X Deng,et al. Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[19] C. Peng,et al. Nonviral transfection of suspension cells in ultrasound standing wave fields. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[20] Qing‐Li Zhao,et al. Effects of dissolved gases and an echo contrast agent on apoptosis induced by ultrasound and its mechanism via the mitochondria-caspase pathway. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[21] Thierry Bettinger,et al. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.
[22] W. Pitt,et al. Ultrasonic drug delivery – a general review , 2004, Expert opinion on drug delivery.
[23] Yun Zhou,et al. Study of sonoporation dynamics affected by ultrasound duty cycle. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[24] M. Machluf,et al. Therapeutic ultrasound optimization for gene delivery: a key factor achieving nuclear DNA localization. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.
[25] A. Bouakaz,et al. Effect of ultrasound-activated microbubbles on the cell electrophysiological properties. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[26] Shubiao Zhang,et al. Cationic compounds used in lipoplexes and polyplexes for gene delivery. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.
[27] N. Amso,et al. Contrast agent bubble and erythrocyte behavior in a 1.5-MHz standing ultrasound wave. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[28] E. Benes,et al. In vitro thrombolysis enhanced by standing and travelling ultrasound wave fields. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[29] V F Humphrey,et al. An experimental investigation of streaming in pulsed diagnostic ultrasound beams. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[30] Qing‐Li Zhao,et al. Influence of changing pulse repetition frequency on chemical and biological effects induced by low-intensity ultrasound in vitro. , 2009, Ultrasonics sonochemistry.
[31] F. Wurm,et al. Calfection: a novel gene transfer method for suspension cells. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[32] N. Gu,et al. Experimental study on cell self-sealing during sonoporation. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.
[33] E. Benes,et al. 2MHz ultrasound enhances t-PA-mediated thrombolysis: comparison of continuous versus pulsed ultrasound and standing versus travelling acoustic waves , 2003, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.