Analysis of emergent fault element behavior in Virtual California

The Virtual California simulation tool can be used to study fault and stress interaction scenarios for realistic California earthquakes and produces a large data set, which is ideally suited for statistical analysis. As with any complex system, it can produce emergent phenomena unexpected by its designers; these can be studied in order to gain insight into real world geophysical phenomena. We have developed a statistical method to analyze Virtual California data that enables us to determine the correlation relationships between the simulated fault elements. We present the results of this analysis of 40 000 years of data for 59 faults (639 elements). We focus on five specific cases that display noteworthy behavior that includes long‐range fault interactions, activation–quiescence, and complex small‐scale interactions. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Basil Tikoff,et al.  Oblique plate motion and continental tectonics , 1995 .

[2]  C. Johnson,et al.  Tectonic implications of the Brawley earthquake swarm, Imperial Valley, California, January 1975 , 1975 .

[3]  J. Rundle.  A physical model for earthquakes: 2. Application to southern California , 1988 .

[4]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Seismicity Remotely Triggered by the Magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, Earthquake , 1993, Science.

[5]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  High‐resolution image of Calaveras Fault seismicity , 2002 .

[6]  Lynn R. Sykes,et al.  Changes in State of Stress on the Southern San Andreas Fault Resulting from the California Earthquake Sequence of April to June 1992 , 1992, Science.

[7]  Serkan B. Bozkurt,et al.  Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California : Animations built on earthquake stress transfer : Stress transfer, earthquake triggering, and time-dependent seismic hazard , 2005 .

[8]  Andrea Donnellan,et al.  Space-time clustering and correlations of major earthquakes. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[9]  G. C. Fox,et al.  A simulation-based approach to forecasting the next great San Francisco earthquake , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  G. Fox,et al.  Gutenberg-Richter statistics in topologically realistic system-level earthquake stress-evolution simulations , 2004 .

[11]  C. R. Allen,et al.  Preearthquake and Postearthquake Creep on the Imperial Fault and the Brawley Fault Zone , 1982 .

[12]  Maya Paczuski,et al.  Complex networks of earthquakes and aftershocks , 2004, physics/0408018.

[13]  Tousson Toppozada,et al.  San Andreas Fault Zone, California: M ≥5.5 Earthquake History , 2002 .

[14]  K. Tiampo,et al.  Nonlinear network dynamics on earthquake fault systems. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[15]  James F. Dolan,et al.  Long-range and long-term fault interactions in Southern California , 2004 .

[16]  Basil Tikoff,et al.  New slip rate estimates for the creeping segment of the San Andreas fault, California , 2005 .

[17]  K. Sieh,et al.  Prospects for Larger or More Frequent Earthquakes in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Region , 1995, Science.

[18]  Glenn P. Biasi,et al.  Wrightwood and the earthquake cycle: What a long recurrence record tells us about how faults work , 2004 .

[19]  Thomas K. Rockwell,et al.  Paleoseismology of the Johnson Valley, Kickapoo, and Homestead Valley Faults: Clustering of Earthquakes in the Eastern California Shear Zone , 2000 .

[20]  Wayne Thatcher,et al.  Nonlinear strain buildup and the earthquake cycle on the San Andreas Fault , 1983 .

[21]  F.,et al.  GEM Plate Boundary Simulations for the Plate Boundary Observatory : A Program for Understanding the Physics of Earthquakes on Complex Fault Networks via Observations , Theory and Numerical Simulation , 2002 .