Learning from multiple representations: An examination of fixation patterns in a science simulation

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  W. Hays Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams Networks Maps. , 1985 .

[3]  J. Findlay,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  R. A. Tarmizi,et al.  Guidance during Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1988 .

[6]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[8]  Michal Yerushalmy,et al.  Student perceptions of aspects of algebraic function using multiple representation software , 1991 .

[9]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[10]  M. Hegarty Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[13]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[14]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. , 1998 .

[15]  Jan van der Meij,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations , 1998 .

[16]  Priti Shah,et al.  A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension , 1998 .

[17]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[18]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Unlocking conceptual learning in mathematics and science with effective representational systems , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[19]  W. Schnotz,et al.  Einflüsse der Visualisierungsform auf die Konstruktion mentaler Modelle beim Text- und Bildverstehen , 1999 .

[20]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Making Their Own Connections: Students' Understanding of Multiple Models in Basic Electricity , 1999 .

[21]  W Schnotz,et al.  [Influence of the type of visualization on the construction of mental models during picture and text comprehension]. , 1999, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[22]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Allan G. Harrison,et al.  Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry , 2000 .

[24]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[25]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[26]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Learning Chemistry Through the Use of a Representation-Based Knowledge Building Environment , 2002 .

[27]  Tina Seufert Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[28]  M. Bannert,et al.  Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation , 2003 .

[29]  Flávia Maria Santoro,et al.  A conceptual framework for designing and conducting groupware evaluations , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[30]  S. Ainsworth,et al.  Multiple Forms of Dynamic Representation. , 2004 .

[31]  P. Shah,et al.  Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning , 2004 .

[32]  M. Hegarty Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions , 2004 .

[33]  R. Moreno,et al.  Do Multiple Representations Need Explanations? The Role of Verbal Guidance and Individual Differences in Multimedia Mathematics Learning , 2004 .

[34]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[35]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[36]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension , 2005 .

[37]  B. Homer,et al.  Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations , 2006 .

[38]  T. Jong,et al.  Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment , 2006 .

[39]  R. Mayer,et al.  Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments , 2007 .

[40]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Design Factors for Effective Science Simulations: Representation of Information , 2009, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.

[41]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[42]  Bruce D. Homer,et al.  Expertise reversal for iconic representations in science , 2010 .

[43]  Slava Kalyuga Cognitive Load Theory: Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[44]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Expertise reversal for iconic representations in science visualizations , 2010 .

[45]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: THEORY , 2010 .

[46]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains , 2012 .

[47]  Ian David Aronson,et al.  Optimizing educational video through comparative trials in clinical environments , 2012, Educational technology research and development : ETR & D.

[48]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Th e Use of Multiple Representations and the Social Construction of Understanding in Chemistry , 2012 .

[49]  Yan Wang,et al.  Research Article Investigating the Effectiveness of Computer Simulations for Chemistry Learning , 2012 .

[50]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Designing Instruction for Constructivist Learning , 2013 .

[51]  W. Schnotz Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[52]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[53]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Multimedia Learning with Simulations and Microworlds , 2014 .