Shore Power for Vessels Calling at U.S. Ports: Benefits and Costs.

When in port, ships burn marine diesel in on-board generators to produce electricity and are significant contributors to poor local and regional air quality. Supplying ships with grid electricity can reduce these emissions. We use two integrated assessment models to quantify the benefits of reducing the emissions of NOX, SO2, PM2.5, and CO2 that would occur if shore power were used. Using historical vessel call data, we identify combinations of vessels and berths at U.S. ports that could be switched to shore power to yield the largest gains for society. Our results indicate that, depending on the social costs of pollution assumed, an air quality benefit of $70-150 million per year could be achieved by retrofitting a quarter to two-thirds of all vessels that call at U.S. ports. Such a benefit could be produced at no net cost to society (health and environmental benefits would be balanced by the cost of ship and port retrofit) but would require many ships to be equipped to receive shore power, even if doing so would result in a private loss for the operator. Policy makers could produce a net societal gain by implementing incentives and mandates to encourage a shift toward shore power.

[1]  Peter Wallace,et al.  Cold Iron, A Maritime Contribution to our Environment , 2011 .

[2]  Peter J. Adams,et al.  Reduced-form modeling of public health impacts of inorganic PM2.5 and precursor emissions , 2016 .

[3]  Constantine Samaras,et al.  Estimation of regional air-quality damages from Marcellus Shale natural gas extraction in Pennsylvania , 2013 .

[4]  A. Robinson,et al.  Secondary aerosol formation from photochemical aging of aircraft exhaust in a smog chamber , 2010 .

[5]  Nicholas Z. Muller Linking Policy to Statistical Uncertainty in Air Pollution Damages , 2011 .

[6]  Nicholas Z. Muller,et al.  Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States , 2007 .

[7]  Noelle E Selin,et al.  Changes in inorganic fine particulate matter sensitivities to precursors due to large-scale US emissions reductions. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Jay Apt,et al.  Regional variations in the health, environmental, and climate benefits of wind and solar generation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Emissions and Cost Implications of Controlled Electric Vehicle Charging in the U.S. PJM Interconnection. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Jinhyok Heo Evaluation of Air Quality Impacts on Society: Methods and Application , 2015 .

[13]  H S C O T T M A T T H E W S A N D L E S T E,et al.  Applications of Environmental Valuation for Determining Externality Costs † , 2022 .

[14]  R. Winkel,et al.  Shore Side Electricity in Europe: Potential and environmental benefits , 2016 .