Comparative Study of E- and U-core Modular Dual-Stator Axial-Field Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Motors With Different Stator/Rotor-Pole Combinations Based on Flux Modulation Principle

In this paper, the dual-stator axial-field flux-switching permanent magnet (DSAFFSPM) motors with E- and U-core stator modular segments, as well as different stator/rotor-pole combinations are compared. The operation performance of the DSAFFSPM machines are explored by using the MMF-permeance model method. A more comprehensive theoretical analysis, no more limited to numerical calculation, is presented. This reveals directly the relations between the operation performance and design parameters of the machine. The performance comparisons between the E-shaped and U-shaped teeth DSAFFSPM machines are given, including the effects of the structural parameters on the electromagnetic torque, different stator/rotor-pole combinations on the winding factor and gear ratio, the differences of the average torque and the torque density and the efficiency in the 12/10 U-core and 6/10 E-core topology. These are the basis of the DSAFFSPM machine design and optimization. Finally, the experiments on the two prototype, 6/10 E-core and 12/10 U-core DSAFFSPM machines are carried out. The results show that the average torque of the 12/10 U-core prototype is higher than that of the 6/10 E-core prototype, while the torque density and the efficiency of 6/10 E-core DSAFFSPM machines are much higher.

[1]  N. Bianchi,et al.  Performance Comparison Between Switching-Flux and IPM Machines With Rare-Earth and Ferrite PMs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[2]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Advanced Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Brushless Machines , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[3]  Wenxin Huang,et al.  Analysis of Rotor Poles and Armature Winding Configurations Combinations of Wound Field Flux Switching Machines , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Geraint W. Jewell,et al.  Comparison of flux switching and surface mounted permanent magnet generators for aerospace applications , 2010 .

[5]  Z. Zhu,et al.  A Novel Axial Field Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Wind Power Generator , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  S. E. Rauch,et al.  Design Principles of Flux-Switch Alternators [includes discussion] , 1955, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[7]  Mingyao Lin,et al.  Static Characteristics of a Novel Axial Field Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Motor with Three Stator Structures , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[8]  Xin Wu,et al.  Analytical calculation of magnetic field of bearingless flux‐switching permanent‐magnet machine based on doubly‐salient relative permeance method , 2020, IET Electric Power Applications.

[9]  Z. Q. Zhu,et al.  Optimal Number of Flux Modulation Pole in Vernier Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[10]  E. Afjei,et al.  Non‐linear analytical modelling and optimisation of a 12/8 rotor excited flux‐switching machine , 2020, IET Electric Power Applications.

[11]  Ronghai Qu,et al.  Performance Comparison of Surface and Spoke-Type Flux-Modulation Machines With Different Pole Ratios , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[12]  J T Chen,et al.  A Novel E-Core Switched-Flux PM Brushless AC Machine , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[13]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Flux Reversal Permanent Magnet Machines With Toroidal and Concentrated Windings , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Shuangxia Niu,et al.  A Novel Axial-Flux-Complementary Doubly Salient Machine With Boosted PM Utilization for Cost-Effective Direct-Drive Applications , 2019, IEEE Access.

[15]  Guohai Liu,et al.  Consequent Pole Permanent Magnet Vernier Machine With Asymmetric Air-Gap Field Distribution , 2019, IEEE Access.

[16]  Ming Cheng,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Flux-Switching Permanent-Magnet Motors With Interior Permanent Magnet Motor for EV, HEV, and PHEV Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  Q. Lu,et al.  Comparative Study of E-Core and C-Core Modular PM Linear Machines With Different Slot/Pole Combinations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[18]  Mingyao Lin,et al.  Analysis and Comparison of Axial Field Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Machines With Three Different Stator Cores , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[19]  Mingyao Lin,et al.  Cogging Torque Reduction of a Hybrid Axial Field Flux-Switching Permanent-Magnet Machine With Three Methods , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[20]  Lijian Wu,et al.  Magnetic Circuit Modeling of Dual-Armature Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Machine , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[22]  Byung-Il Kwon,et al.  High Gear Ratio Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Machine for High Torque Performance , 2020, IEEE Access.

[23]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Comparative Study on Novel Dual Stator Radial Flux and Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Motors With Ferrite Magnets for Traction Application , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[24]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  A Novel Dual-Rotor, Axial Field, Fault-Tolerant Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Machine With High-Torque Performance , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[25]  Nian Li,et al.  Dual-Skew Magnet for Cogging Torque Minimization of Axial Flux PMSM With Segmented Stator , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[26]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Analysis of Air-Gap Field Modulation and Magnetic Gearing Effects in Switched Flux Permanent Magnet Machines , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[27]  Li Hao,et al.  Analysis of Axial Field Flux-Switching Memory Machine Based on 3-D Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Network Considering Magnetic Hysteresis , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.