Evaluation of Geometrical Parameters of a Spur Gear Manufactured in an Incremental Process from GP1 Steel

The main applicability criterion of an additive process is whether it allows a functional component to be directly manufactured. Obtaining the assumed dimensional and shape accuracy is an aspect of such functionality. In the case of additive manufacturing, geometrical accuracy depends on the additive technique, the use of which requires additional processes. This study presents the application of coordinate measurement methods to determine geometry reproduction accuracy for gears made in a hybrid process. The authors were able to determine the accuracy of gear geometry reproduction by means of Additive Manufacturing (AM) DMLS (Direct Metal Laser Sintering) techniques supplemented by subtractive finishing. Deformation for test models manufactured using the additive method were evaluated, along with the effect of post-processing, especially in terms of geometric deviations and the presence of shrinkage affecting the amount of allowance required in the correct subtractive manufacturing process. Model geometry was verified by contactless optical system ATOS II Triple Scan and a specialist coordinate measuring machine P40 by Klingelnberg. The analyses revealed that the machining allowance of 0.4 mm in the test model made it possible to obtain gear accuracy class 8 (in line with the assumptions) according to DIN 3962 when tooth spaces were machined using a non-specialist tool.

[1]  Lara Rebaioli,et al.  A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical performance of additive manufacturing processes , 2017 .

[2]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Multi-criteria GA-based Pareto optimization of building direction for rapid prototyping , 2013 .

[3]  Grzegorz Budzik,et al.  An Analysis of the Surface Geometric Structure and Geometric Accuracy of Cylindrical Gear Teeth Manufactured with the Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) Method , 2019, Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering.

[4]  Joshua D. Gale,et al.  Application of ultrasonic peening during DMLS production of 316L stainless steel and its effect on material behavior , 2017 .

[5]  Grzegorz Budzik,et al.  Manufacturing of aircraft engine transmission gear with SLS (DMLS) method , 2016 .

[6]  Pero Raos,et al.  Experimental analysis of surface roughness and surface texture of machined and fused deposition modelled parts , 2014 .

[7]  L. Napoli,et al.  The Influence of Build Orientation on the Flatness Error in Artifact Produced by Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) Process , 2019, Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II.

[8]  F. Calignano,et al.  Influence of process parameters on surface roughness of aluminum parts produced by DMLS , 2012, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[9]  Eleonora Atzeni,et al.  On the effect of process parameters on properties of AlSi10Mg parts produced by DMLS , 2014 .

[10]  R. Poprawe,et al.  Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms , 2012 .

[11]  Sam Anand,et al.  Selection of build orientation for optimal support structures and minimum part errors in additive manufacturing , 2017 .

[12]  L. Froyen,et al.  Binding Mechanisms in Selective Laser Sintering and Selective Laser Melting , 2004 .