Molecular Mechanisms of Gene Silencing Mediated by DNA Methylation

ABSTRACT DNA methylation and chromatin modification operate along a common pathway to repress transcription; accordingly, several experiments demonstrate that the effects of DNA methylation can spread in cis and do not require promoter modification. In order to investigate the molecular details of the inhibitory effect of methylation, we microinjected into Xenopus oocytes a series of constructs containing a human CpG-rich sequence which has been differentially methylated and cloned at different positions relative to a specific promoter. The parameters influencing the diffusion of gene silencing and the importance of histone deacetylation in the spreading effect were analyzed. We demonstrate that a few methylated cytosines can inhibit a flanking promoter but a threshold of modified sites is required to organize a stable, diffusible chromatin structure. Histone deacetylation is the main cause of gene repression only when methylation does not reach levels sufficient to establish this particular structure. Moreover, contrary to the common thought, promoter modification does not lead to the greater repressive effect; the existence of a competition between transactivators and methyl-binding proteins for the establishment of an open conformation justifies the results obtained.

[1]  J. Herman,et al.  Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, chromatin formation and gene expression in cancer. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[2]  M. Yang,et al.  Evidence That Silencing of the HPRT Promoter by DNA Methylation Is Mediated by Critical CpG Sites* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  J. Newell-Price,et al.  DNA Methylation and Silencing of Gene Expression , 2000, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[4]  J. Herman,et al.  DNA hypermethylation in tumorigenesis: epigenetics joins genetics. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  A. Bird,et al.  Methylation-Induced Repression— Belts, Braces, and Chromatin , 1999, Cell.

[6]  D. Haber,et al.  DNA Methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b Are Essential for De Novo Methylation and Mammalian Development , 1999, Cell.

[7]  E. Ballestar,et al.  Mi-2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Paul Tempst,et al.  MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[9]  A. Bird,et al.  Analysis of the NuRD subunits reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA methylation. , 1999, Genes & development.

[10]  Carol Imbriano,et al.  Dissection of the NF-Y transcriptional activation potential , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  S. Warren,et al.  Acetylated histones are associated with FMR1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[12]  J. Herman,et al.  Synergy of demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in the re-expression of genes silenced in cancer , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[13]  A. Razin,et al.  CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing—a three‐way connection , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[14]  T. Hashimshony,et al.  DNA methylation models histone acetylation , 1998, Nature.

[15]  A. Bird,et al.  Identification and Characterization of a Family of Mammalian Methyl-CpG Binding Proteins , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  J. Strouboulis,et al.  Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Colin A. Johnson,et al.  Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex , 1998, Nature.

[18]  S. Minucci,et al.  Retinoid receptor-induced alteration of the chromatin assembled on a ligand-responsive promoter in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Molecular endocrinology.

[19]  C. Hsieh.  Stability of patch methylation and its impact in regions of transcriptional initiation and elongation , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[20]  R. Jaenisch.  DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother? , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[21]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Remodeling of regulatory nucleoprotein complexes on the Xenopus hsp70 promoter during meiotic maturation of the Xenopus oocyte , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[22]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Determinants of chromatin disruption and transcriptional regulation instigated by the thyroid hormone receptor: hormone‐regulated chromatin disruption is not sufficient for transcriptional activation , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[23]  Z. Siegfried,et al.  DNA methylation: A molecular lock , 1997, Current Biology.

[24]  Stefan U Kass,et al.  DNA methylation directs a time-dependent repression of transcription initiation , 1997, Current Biology.

[25]  A. Bird,et al.  MeCP2 Is a Transcriptional Repressor with Abundant Binding Sites in Genomic Chromatin , 1997, Cell.

[26]  D. Barlow,et al.  Multiple roles for DNA methylation in gametic imprinting. , 1996, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[27]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Role of chromatin and Xenopus laevis heat shock transcription factor in regulation of transcription from the X. laevis hsp70 promoter in vivo , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  A. Wolffe,et al.  A role for nucleosome assembly in both silencing and activation of the Xenopus TR beta A gene by the thyroid hormone receptor. , 1995, Genes & development.

[29]  S. Cross,et al.  CpG islands and genes. , 1995, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[30]  S. Baylin,et al.  Demethylation of the estrogen receptor gene in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells can reactivate estrogen receptor gene expression. , 1995, Cancer research.

[31]  C. Hsieh,et al.  Dependence of transcriptional repression on CpG methylation density , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[32]  A. Razin,et al.  DNA methylation and genomic imprinting , 1994, Cell.

[33]  H. Cedar,et al.  Role of DNA methylation in the regulation of transcription. , 1994, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[34]  A. Graessmann,et al.  Methylation of single sites within the herpes simplex virus tk coding region and the simian virus 40 T-antigen intron causes gene inactivation , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[35]  S. Cross,et al.  Purification of CpG islands using a methylated DNA binding column , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[36]  S. Kass,et al.  Inactive chromatin spreads from a focus of methylation , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[37]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting , 1993, Nature.

[38]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Replication-coupled chromatin assembly is required for the repression of basal transcription in vivo. , 1993, Genes & development.

[39]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Nuclear assembly, structure, and function: the use of Xenopus in vitro systems. , 1993, Experimental cell research.

[40]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality , 1992, Cell.

[41]  A. Bird,et al.  Purification, sequence, and cellular localization of a novel chromosomal protein that binds to Methylated DNA , 1992, Cell.

[42]  A. Riggs,et al.  X-chromosome inactivation and cell memory. , 1992, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[43]  L. E. McDonald,et al.  A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  A. Bird,et al.  Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl‐CpG binding protein. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[45]  T. Perlmann,et al.  Inhibition of chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes correlates with derepression of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[46]  Adrian Bird,et al.  DNA methylation inhibits transcription indirectly via a methyl-CpG binding protein , 1991, Cell.

[47]  V. Chapman,et al.  Use of a HpaII-polymerase chain reaction assay to study DNA methylation in the Pgk-1 CpG island of mouse embryos at the time of X-chromosome inactivation , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[48]  A. Graessmann,et al.  DNA methylation, chromatin structure and regulation of Herpes simplex virus tk gene expression. , 1988, Gene.

[49]  A. Razin,et al.  Effect of in vitro DNA methylation on beta-globin gene expression. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  E. Murray,et al.  Site specific demethylation in the promoter of human gamma‐globin gene does not alleviate methylation mediated suppression. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[51]  A. Graessmann,et al.  Chromatin structure is required to block transcription of the methylated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Howard Cedar,et al.  DNA methylation affects the formation of active chromatin , 1986, Cell.

[53]  H. Cedar,et al.  Effect of regional DNA methylation on gene expression. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Peter A. Jones.  Altering gene expression with 5-azacytidine , 1985, Cell.

[55]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[56]  M. Ehrlich,et al.  Comparison of bisulfite modification of 5-methyldeoxycytidine and deoxycytidine residues. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[57]  Vlad I. Morariu,et al.  Expression , 2015, Principles of Molecular Virology.

[58]  A. Razin,et al.  Effect of in vitro DNA methylation on ,-globin gene expression , 2022 .