DNA replication stress: causes, resolution and disease.

[1]  C. Croce,et al.  The FHIT Gene, Spanning the Chromosome 3p14.2 Fragile Site and Renal Carcinoma–Associated t(3;8) Breakpoint, Is Abnormal in Digestive Tract Cancers , 1996, Cell.

[2]  R. Shridhar,et al.  Aphidicolin-induced FRA3B breakpoints cluster in two distinct regions. , 1997, Genomics.

[3]  Bin Li,et al.  Stimulation of p53-mediated Transcriptional Activation by the p53-binding Proteins, 53BP1 and 53BP2* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  A. Brenner,et al.  WWOX, the FRA16D gene, behaves as a suppressor of tumor growth. , 2001, Cancer research.

[5]  Rosanna Weksberg,et al.  Mutant chromatin remodeling protein SMARCAL1 causes Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[6]  David I. Smith,et al.  Evidence that instability within the FRA3B region extends four megabases , 2002, Oncogene.

[7]  Judith A. Goodship,et al.  A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia–telangiectasia and Rad3–related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[8]  David I. Smith,et al.  Characterization of FRA6E and its potential role in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism and ovarian cancer , 2003, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[9]  R. Hansen,et al.  ATR and ATM-Dependent Movement of BLM Helicase during Replication Stress Ensures Optimal ATM Activation and 53BP1 Focus Formation , 2004, Cell cycle.

[10]  G. Oakley,et al.  Replication Protein A and the Mre11·Rad50·Nbs1 Complex Co-localize and Interact at Sites of Stalled Replication Forks* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  T. Glover,et al.  DNA polymerase α inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes , 2004, Human Genetics.

[12]  M. Tischkowitz,et al.  Fanconi anaemia and leukaemia – clinical and molecular aspects , 2004, British journal of haematology.

[13]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  The Rpd3-Sin3 Histone Deacetylase Regulates Replication Timing and Enables Intra-S Origin Control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[14]  J. D. Engel,et al.  Recruitment of Transcription Complexes to the β-Globin Gene Locus in Vivo and in Vitro* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  J. Heierhorst,et al.  ASCIZ regulates lesion‐specific Rad51 focus formation and apoptosis after methylating DNA damage , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[16]  Dimitris Kletsas,et al.  Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions , 2005, Nature.

[17]  T. Ørntoft,et al.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis , 2005, Nature.

[18]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  The Fanconi anemia pathway is required for the DNA replication stress response and for the regulation of common fragile site stability. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[19]  V. Costanzo,et al.  ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[20]  M. Botchan,et al.  Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2–7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Dimitris Kletsas,et al.  Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints , 2006, Nature.

[22]  C. Ponting,et al.  Mutations in genes encoding ribonuclease H2 subunits cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome and mimic congenital viral brain infection , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Aaron Bensimon,et al.  Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication , 2006, Nature.

[24]  P. Neiman,et al.  Genomic instability during Myc-induced lymphomagenesis in the bursa of Fabricius , 2006, Oncogene.

[25]  N. Kanu,et al.  ATMIN defines an NBS1‐independent pathway of ATM signalling , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[26]  H. Stein,et al.  The Myc-evoked DNA damage response accounts for treatment resistance in primary lymphomas in vivo. , 2007, Blood.

[27]  I. Hickson,et al.  RecQ helicases: guardian angels of the DNA replication fork , 2008, Chromosoma.

[28]  T. Glover,et al.  Chromosome fragile sites. , 2007, Annual review of genetics.

[29]  M. Lavin,et al.  ATM Activation and DNA Damage Response , 2007, Cell cycle.

[30]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  An Oncogene-Induced DNA Damage Model for Cancer Development , 2008, Science.

[31]  William C Earnshaw,et al.  Mutations in pericentrin cause Seckel syndrome with defective ATR-dependent DNA damage signaling , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[32]  B. Kerem,et al.  Interplay between ATM and ATR in the regulation of common fragile site stability , 2008, Oncogene.

[33]  M. Bignami,et al.  ATR and ATM differently regulate WRN to prevent DSBs at stalled replication forks and promote replication fork recovery , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[34]  H. Araki,et al.  Regulation of the initiation step of DNA replication by cyclin-dependent kinases , 2010, Chromosoma.

[35]  S. Elledge,et al.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[36]  O. Fernandez-Capetillo,et al.  The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage. , 2010, DNA repair.

[37]  T. Helleday,et al.  Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  M. Botchan,et al.  Activation of the MCM2-7 helicase by association with Cdc45 and GINS proteins. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[39]  D. Adams,et al.  PARK2 deletions occur frequently in sporadic colorectal cancer and accelerate adenoma development in Apc mutant mice , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  K. Labib.  How do Cdc7 and cyclin-dependent kinases trigger the initiation of chromosome replication in eukaryotic cells? , 2010, Genes & development.

[41]  M. Kastan,et al.  Multiple roles of ATM in monitoring and maintaining DNA integrity , 2010, FEBS letters.

[42]  J. Hurwitz,et al.  Selective Bypass of a Lagging Strand Roadblock by the Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Helicase , 2011, Cell.

[43]  A. Helmrich,et al.  Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[44]  J. Blow,et al.  MCM2-7 Form Double Hexamers at Licensed Origins in Xenopus Egg Extract* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  B. Neumann,et al.  53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  Andrea Cocito,et al.  The Replication Checkpoint Protects Fork Stability by Releasing Transcribed Genes from Nuclear Pores , 2011, Cell.

[47]  Nine V.A.M. Knoers,et al.  Mutations in the Pre-Replication Complex cause Meier-Gorlin syndrome , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[48]  R. Scott Hansen,et al.  Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site , 2011, Nature.

[49]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[50]  J. Petrini,et al.  The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[51]  M. Nyegaard,et al.  CtIP Mutations Cause Seckel and Jawad Syndromes , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[52]  D. Koshland,et al.  RNase H and multiple RNA biogenesis factors cooperate to prevent RNA:DNA hybrids from generating genome instability. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[53]  Zhao-Qi Wang,et al.  Competition between NBS1 and ATMIN controls ATM signaling pathway choice. , 2012, Cell reports.

[54]  D. Cortez,et al.  Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of proteins at replication forks and in assembled chromatin using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[55]  Raquel Herrador,et al.  Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[56]  J. Diffley,et al.  Activation of the replicative DNA helicase: breaking up is hard to do. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[57]  Lilia Alberghina,et al.  Comparative analysis of the molecular mechanisms controlling the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in yeast and in mammalian cells. , 2012, Biotechnology advances.

[58]  J. Bartek,et al.  CDK targeting of NBS1 promotes DNA‐end resection, replication restart and homologous recombination , 2012, EMBO reports.

[59]  V. Costanzo,et al.  Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability , 2012, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[60]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Dynamic Imaging of Genomic Loci in Living Human Cells by an Optimized CRISPR/Cas System , 2014, Cell.

[61]  N. Mailand,et al.  ATR Prohibits Replication Catastrophe by Preventing Global Exhaustion of RPA , 2013, Cell.

[62]  M. Rowicka,et al.  Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand breaks mapping by next-generation sequencing , 2013, Nature Methods.

[63]  N. Bec,et al.  FANCD2 binds MCM proteins and controls replisome function upon activation of s phase checkpoint signaling. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[64]  H. Masai,et al.  Replication timing regulation of eukaryotic replicons: Rif1 as a global regulator of replication timing. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[65]  L. Staudt,et al.  Identification of Early Replicating Fragile Sites that Contribute to Genome Instability , 2013, Cell.

[66]  W. Dunphy,et al.  The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex has a specific role in the activation of Chk1 in response to stalled replication forks , 2013, Molecular biology of the cell.

[67]  L. Zou,et al.  Two distinct modes of ATR activation orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1. , 2013, Cell reports.

[68]  Benjamin P. C. Chen,et al.  Lamin A/C Depletion Enhances DNA Damage-Induced Stalled Replication Fork Arrest , 2013, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[69]  K. Cimprich,et al.  Causes and consequences of replication stress , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[70]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability , 2013, Nature.

[71]  F. Rosselli,et al.  ERCC1 and MUS81–EME1 promote sister chromatid separation by processing late replication intermediates at common fragile sites during mitosis , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[72]  Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability (vol 494, pg 492, 2013) , 2013 .

[73]  Anne-Sophie Boyer,et al.  The human specialized DNA polymerases and non-B DNA: vital relationships to preserve genome integrity. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  Y. Liu,et al.  MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[75]  K. Cimprich,et al.  A role for the MRN complex in ATR activation via TOPBP1 recruitment. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[76]  Maya Raghunandan,et al.  FANCD2 regulates BLM complex functions independently of FANCI to promote replication fork recovery , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[77]  A. Nussenzweig,et al.  Naked Replication Forks Break apRPArt , 2013, Cell.

[78]  N. Mailand,et al.  ATR–Chk1–APC/CCdh1-dependent stabilization of Cdc7–ASK (Dbf4) kinase is required for DNA lesion bypass under replication stress , 2013, Genes & development.

[79]  J. Gautier,et al.  Cdc45 is a critical effector of myc-dependent DNA replication stress. , 2013, Cell reports.

[80]  P. Ménard,et al.  Nascent chromatin capture proteomics determines chromatin dynamics during DNA replication and identifies unknown fork components , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.

[81]  A. Aguilera,et al.  BRCA2 prevents R-loop accumulation and associates with TREX-2 mRNA export factor PCID2 , 2014, Nature.

[82]  S. Jackson,et al.  Chemical Inhibition of NAT10 Corrects Defects of Laminopathic Cells , 2014, Science.

[83]  J. Kasperbauer,et al.  A selected group of large common fragile site genes have decreased expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas , 2014, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[84]  J. Yeo,et al.  CtIP mediates replication fork recovery in a FANCD2-regulated manner. , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[85]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Aprataxin resolves adenylated RNA-DNA junctions to maintain genome integrity , 2013, Nature.

[86]  D. Higgs,et al.  ATRX Dysfunction Induces Replication Defects in Primary Mouse Cells , 2014, PloS one.

[87]  S. Campaner,et al.  Myc induced replicative stress response: How to cope with it and exploit it. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.