Effect of chronic use of different propulsion systems in wheelchair design on the aerobic capacity of Indian users.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE The use of wheelchairs (WC) of ergonomically different propulsion mechanisms may influence the cardiorespiratory capacity of the WC user. The purpose of the present investigation was to observe the impact of chronic use of four ergonomically different propulsion systems and age of the WC users on their aerobic capacity. METHODS The male subjects (n=77), exclusively using hand rim (n=20), arm crank using both arms (n=22), arm crank using one arm (n=17), and arm lever using one arm (n=18) propelled WCs and 20 able-bodied (AB) subjects as the control group participated They performed maximal exercise test in continuous, step-wise incremental workload at a crank rate of 50 rpm on an arm-crank ergometer. The VO(2) and heart rate obtained during 2.45 to 3 min of each test exercise, and VO(2max) and HR(max) were derived respectively. Two-way ANOVA and multiple comparison tests were performed to compare the groups with respect to VO(2max) and HR(max). Age was used as a classificatory variable. RESULTS The maximal physiological response of the AB subjects was superior to the WC users but the WC user groups did not show any significant differences amongst them. The aerobic capacity decreased with advancement of age and for WC users this is more pronounced. Equations for age predicted VO(2max) and HR(max) were also derived. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION As the WC users used the four distinct propulsion systems, it was anticipated that it would induce variation in the physiological variables of the users. But the results of the study revealed that there was no significant difference. Suggesting that the WC users might have developed certain self-regulatory mechanisms in order to overcome the variation induced by the different propulsion systems.

[1]  M H Harrison,et al.  The 'Oxylog': an evaluation. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[2]  R. M. Glaser,et al.  Physiological responses to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[3]  O. Bar-or,et al.  Maximal oxygen consumption test during arm exercise--reliability and validity. , 1975, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  P. Åstrand,et al.  Textbook of Work Physiology , 1970 .

[5]  S. Hooker,et al.  Effects of low- and moderate-intensity training in spinal cord-injured persons. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  T. Janssen,et al.  Responses of subjects with spinal cord injuries to maximal wheelchair exercise: comparison of discontinuous and continuous protocols , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[7]  G Mukherjee,et al.  Energy cost and locomotor performance of the low-cost arm-lever-propelled three-wheeled chair , 2001, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[8]  K. Andersen,et al.  Fundamentals of exercise testing , 1971 .

[9]  B. Saltin,et al.  Hemodynamic response to work with different muscle groups, sitting and supine. , 1967, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  A. Vailas,et al.  Compatibility of adaptive responses with combining strength and endurance training. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  N L Jones,et al.  The use of multistage exercise testing with wheelchair ergometry and arm cranking in subjects with spinal cord lesions , 1977, Paraplegia.

[12]  G Mukherjee,et al.  Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  B. Fernhall,et al.  Exercise capacity of untrained spinal cord injured individuals and the relationship of peak oxygen uptake to level of injury , 1990, Paraplegia.

[14]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Physical work capacity after 7 wk of wheelchair training: effect of intensity in able-bodied subjects. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  G Hildebrandt,et al.  Energy costs of propelling wheelchair at various speeds: cardiac response and effect on steering accuracy. , 1970, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  L L Laubach,et al.  Wheelchair exercise performance of the young, middle-aged, and elderly. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[17]  N L Jones,et al.  Arm cranking and wheelchair ergometry in elite spinal cord-injured athletes. , 1983, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Physical strain in daily life of wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  R. Shephard Sports Medicine and the Wheelchair Athlete , 1988, Sports medicine.

[20]  B. Franklin,et al.  Aerobic capacity in early paraplegia: implications for rehabilitation , 1989, Paraplegia.

[21]  G Mukherjee,et al.  Arm-crank propelled three-wheeled chair: physiological evaluation of the propulsion using one arm and both arm patterns , 2004, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[22]  M. Pollock,et al.  Arm pedaling as an endurance training regimen for the disabled. , 1974, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  H. A. Dahl,et al.  Textbook of Work Physiology: Physiological Bases of Exercise, Fourth Edition , 2003 .

[25]  K B Pandolf,et al.  Determination of maximal aerobic power during upper-body exercise. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.