Cost analysis before and after implementation of a computerized physician order entry order form for enoxaparin.

OBJECTIVE The authors sought to analyze the impact of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) order form for enoxaparin sodium injection (Lovenox) to reduce the daily cost of drug therapy by switching appropriate patients to once-daily enoxaparin administration. METHODS The study population included patients older than 18 years of age who had been treated with enoxaparin from September 1 to December 31, 2008 (the pre-order form implementation group) and from March 1 to June 30, 2009 (the post-order form implementation group). The wholesale acquisition cost was used to determine the cost of enoxaparin per day. Appropriate dosing was established by chart review. RESULTS The post-implementation group showed a trend toward a higher cost of enoxaparin therapy per day compared with the pre-implementation group (P = 0.23). There was a non-significant increase in appropriate dosing after implementation of the order form-from 64.5% before implementation to 71.5% after implementation (P = 0.13). In the overall cohort, although the authors controlled for other factors that could influence cost, patients who received the appropriate dose per protocol were 3.2 times more likely (95% confidence interval, 1.8-5.9; P = 0.001) to have lower enoxaparin drug costs per day of therapy. CONCLUSION The use of a CPOE enoxaparin order form did not reduce the daily cost of therapy.

[1]  Christian Lovis,et al.  Preparation and use of preconstructed orders, order sets, and order menus in a computerized provider order entry system. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[2]  G J Kuperman,et al.  A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests. , 1999, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Impact of electronic prescribing in a hospital setting: A process-focused evaluation , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  J. Fiessinger,et al.  Comparison of a once Daily with a twice Daily Subcutaneous Low Molecular Weight Heparin Regimen in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis , 1998, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[5]  M. M. Quinn,et al.  Improving patient safety using interactive, evidence-based decision support tools. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[6]  V. Kakkar,et al.  Effects of a low-molecular-weight heparin on thrombus regression and recurrent thromboembolism in patients with deep-vein thrombosis. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  David W Bates,et al.  A computer-based intervention for improving the appropriateness of antiepileptic drug level monitoring. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Subcutaneous treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin. A dose finding study with LMWH-Novo. , 1989, Thrombosis research.

[9]  Asli Ozdas,et al.  Research Paper: Integrating "Best of Care" Protocols into Clinicians' Workflow via Care Provider Order Entry: Impact on Quality-of-Care Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  J. Leikin,et al.  Computerized N-Acetylcysteine Physician Order Entry by Template Protocol for Acetaminophen Toxicity , 2011, American journal of therapeutics.

[11]  G. Bratt,et al.  Fragmin once or twice daily subcutaneously in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of the leg. , 1992, Thrombosis research.

[12]  R. Yusen,et al.  Subcutaneous Enoxaparin Once or Twice Daily Compared with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic Disease , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Christopher R. Zimmerman,et al.  Developing and implementing clinical decision support for use in a computerized prescriber-order-entry system. , 2010, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[14]  R. Hull,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. , 1986, Chest.

[15]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). , 2008, Chest.

[16]  G. Raskob,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). , 2008, Chest.

[17]  KAVEH G. SHOJANIA,et al.  Research Paper: Reducing Vancomycin Use Utilizing a Computer Guideline: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  C. McDonald,et al.  Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. , 1993, JAMA.