Increasingly, moral objections are being voiced to the use or killing of animals for educational purposes, and students' opinions are reflecting this. An animal rights philosophy often underlies these objections, but many people are unaware of the logic of the animal rights position, which is often dismissed as sentimentalism or anthropomorphism. While it is now possible to take A-level biology without undertaking dissection, there are many potential undergraduate students who would like to do courses in biology, medicine, pharmacology, physiology, and nursing, but are dissuaded by the animal use involved. Such students are frequently not offered non-animal options and risk being marked down in course work and exams, even though considerable advances have been made in the development of alternative teaching aids. This article summarizes the animal rights argument, and reviews some of the alternative approaches and their teaching effectiveness.
[1]
M. Midgley,et al.
The Moral Status of Animals.
,
1978
.
[2]
T. Regan.
The Case for Animal Rights
,
1983
.
[3]
V. Saano,et al.
Video teaching — glamour without effect
,
1987
.
[4]
David Dewhurst,et al.
Computer Simulations--An Alternative to the Use of Animals in Teaching?.
,
1988
.
[5]
Guy J. Brown,et al.
Microcomputer Simulations of Laboratory Experiments in Physiology
,
1988
.
[6]
D. Adams,et al.
Evidence for Pain and Suffering in Other Animals
,
1989
.
[7]
R. Downie,et al.
The use of animals in biology teaching in higher education.
,
1989,
Journal of biological education.
[8]
Guy J. Brown,et al.
Using the BBC microcomputer to teach the electrocardiogram to biology students
,
1990
.