Optimal and Approximate Policies for Inventory Systems with Order Crossover

A common assumption in inventory analysis is that replenishment orders arrive in the same sequence in which they were placed. In practice, however, a variety of factors may cause orders to arrive out of sequence, a phenomenon known as order crossover. This paper analyzes a periodic review inventory system for a single item with discrete variable demand and discrete variable and long lead-times (relative to the review period). Under such a scenario, multiple orders are simultaneously outstanding, and orders may arrive in a different sequence than placed. If such order crossover occurs, traditional inventory analysis overstates expected shortages and standard inventory control policies are no longer optimal. This paper discusses why orders may cross over in practice and investigates the implications of order crossover to inventory management policies. We investigate the cost performance of optimal policies under order crossover and also suggest approximate policies which are easier to compute and implement. Both the optimal and approximate policies take advantage of detailed real-time information about the status of pending orders and goods in transit, and hence in a majority of cases perform better than commonly used policies which do not incorporate such information.

[1]  J. Keith Ord,et al.  Multiple sourcing: The determination of lead times , 1991, Oper. Res. Lett..

[2]  A. Banerjee,et al.  An integrated JIT inventory model , 1995 .

[3]  Lawrence W. Robinson,et al.  Improved Base-Stock Approximations for Independent Stochastic Lead Times with Order Crossover , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[4]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  The dynamics of emergency transhipment supply chains , 2000 .

[5]  J. Riezebos Inventory order crossovers , 2006 .

[6]  Stig Arne Mattsson,et al.  Inventory control in environments with short lead times , 2007 .

[7]  Brent D. Williams,et al.  Hidden effects of variable order review intervals in inventory control , 2008 .

[8]  Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.  Note: Dual sourcing with nonidentical suppliers , 1993 .

[9]  L. Joseph Thomas,et al.  Consequences of Order Crossover Under Order-Up-To Inventory Policies , 2001, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[10]  W. C. Benton,et al.  SOLE SOURCING VERSUS DUAL SOURCING UNDER STOCHASTIC DEMANDS AND LEAD TIMES , 1994 .

[11]  Hon-Shiang Lau,et al.  Optimal ordering policies with two suppliers when lead times and demands are all stochastic , 1993 .

[12]  Martin L. Puterman,et al.  Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming , 1994 .

[13]  Brent D. Williams,et al.  A review of inventory management research in major logistics journals: Themes and future directions , 2008 .

[14]  Philip T. Evers,et al.  THE IMPACT OF TRANSSHIPMENTS ON SAFETY STOCK REQUIREMENTS , 1996 .

[15]  Mesbah U. Ahmed,et al.  Ordering policies for items with seasonal demand , 2003 .

[16]  Susan H. Xu,et al.  Order crossover in inventory systems , 1995 .

[17]  Charu Chandra,et al.  Managing multi‐item common vendor inventory system with random demands , 2002 .

[18]  Faizul Huq,et al.  Simulation study of a two‐level warehouse inventory replenishment system , 2006 .

[19]  Apostolos Burnetas,et al.  PLANNING MULTIPLE LOCATION INVENTORIES. , 2003 .

[20]  Philip T. Evers,et al.  HIDDEN BENEFITS OF EMERGENCY TRANSSHIPMENTS. , 1997 .

[21]  Jack C. Hayya,et al.  An Inventory Model with Order Crossover , 1998, Oper. Res..

[22]  Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.  Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead-Time s, Q Inventory Models , 1991 .

[23]  Bülent Sezen,et al.  Changes in performance under various lengths of review periods in a periodic review inventory control system with lost sales: A simulation study , 2006 .

[24]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  The Joint Effect of Leadtime Variance and Lot Size in a Parallel Processing Environment , 1996 .

[25]  J. C. Hayya,et al.  On static stochastic order crossover , 2008 .