The role of physical damping in compliant actuation systems

Recently, compliance has been considered as one of the key physical properties that a robot should incorporate to be able to physically interact with humans and uncertain environments. Apart from the improved ability of interaction, mechanical robustness and higher safety-related performances, compliance introduces underdamped oscillatory modes and reduces the mechanical natural frequency of the plant to be controlled making its control much more complex than that of conventional stiff actuators. To overcome these drawbacks, some recent works focus on the incorporation of physical damping within compliant actuators. This work presents an analysis for the quantitative evaluation of the effects of physical damping in compliant robotic joints to demonstrate the improvements (dynamic performance, stability, controllability, tracking precision and energy efficiency) which can be gained by incorporating physical damping in such flexible transmission systems. Simulation and experimental results validate that these benefits can effectively be achieved on an existing compliant actuator prototype with variable physical damping.

[1]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  The Actuator With Mechanically Adjustable Series Compliance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[2]  Jonathan W. Hurst,et al.  Optimal passive dynamics for torque/force control , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Antagonistic and series elastic actuators: a comparative analysis on the energy consumption , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A compact compliant actuator (CompAct™) with variable physical damping , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A compact soft actuator unit for small scale human friendly robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  VSA-CubeBot: A modular variable stiffness platform for multiple degrees of freedom robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  Design and control of a compliant parallel manipulator , 2002 .

[9]  T. Milner,et al.  Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A variable physical damping actuator (VPDA) for compliant robotic joints , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  CompAct Arm™: a Compliant Manipulator with Intrinsic Variable Physical Damping , 2012, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[12]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Safe human robot interaction via energy regulation control , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A new variable stiffness actuator (CompAct-VSA): Design and modelling , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Exploiting natural dynamics for energy minimization using an Actuator with Adjustable Stiffness (AwAS) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  N. G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Analysis and Development of a Semiactive Damper for Compliant Actuation Systems , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[16]  Chee-Meng Chew,et al.  Series damper actuator: a novel force/torque control actuator , 2004, 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004..

[17]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Robots with Flexible Elements , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..