ASTROMETRY.NET: BLIND ASTROMETRIC CALIBRATION OF ARBITRARY ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES

We have built a reliable and robust system that takes as input an astronomical image, and returns as output the pointing, scale, and orientation of that image (the astrometric calibration or World Coordinate System information). The system requires no first guess, and works with the information in the image pixels alone; that is, the problem is a generalization of the "lost in space" problem in which nothing—not even the image scale—is known. After robust source detection is performed in the input image, asterisms (sets of four or five stars) are geometrically hashed and compared to pre-indexed hashes to generate hypotheses about the astrometric calibration. A hypothesis is only accepted as true if it passes a Bayesian decision theory test against a null hypothesis. With indices built from the USNO-B catalog and designed for uniformity of coverage and redundancy, the success rate is >99.9% for contemporary near-ultraviolet and visual imaging survey data, with no false positives. The failure rate is consistent with the incompleteness of the USNO-B catalog; augmentation with indices built from the Two Micron All Sky Survey catalog brings the completeness to 100% with no false positives. We are using this system to generate consistent and standards-compliant meta-data for digital and digitized imaging from plate repositories, automated observatories, individual scientific investigators, and hobbyists. This is the first step in a program of making it possible to trust calibration meta-data for astronomical data of arbitrary provenance.

[1]  Yehezkel Lamdan,et al.  Affine invariant model-based object recognition , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[2]  Luis E. Campusano,et al.  FOCAS AUTOMATIC CATALOG MATCHING ALGORITHMS , 1995 .

[3]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[4]  ROBERT E. Williams,et al.  The Hubble Deep Field: Observations, Data Reduction, and , 1996, astro-ph/9607174.

[5]  Haim J. Wolfson,et al.  Geometric hashing: an overview , 1997 .

[6]  Mark Clampin,et al.  Advanced camera for the Hubble Space Telescope , 1996, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[7]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[8]  Takehisa Yairi,et al.  Fast and simple topological map construction based on cooccurrence frequency of landmark observation , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[9]  R. Bacon,et al.  Overview of the Nearby Supernova Factory , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[10]  J. Munn,et al.  The USNO-B Catalog , 2002, astro-ph/0210694.

[11]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Recognizing solid objects by alignment with an image , 1990, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[12]  P. Seidelmann,et al.  Astrometry in the Age of the Next Generation of Large Telescopes , 2005 .

[13]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Virtual Observatory: Plate Content Digitization, Archive Mining and Image Sequence Processing, , COST Action 283, in the Einstein Year of Physics, 2005 , 2006 .

[14]  M. Skrutskie,et al.  The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) , 2006 .

[15]  Andras Pal,et al.  Astrometry in Wide‐Field Surveys , 2006 .

[16]  David W. Hogg,et al.  CLEANING THE USNO-B CATALOG THROUGH AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF OPTICAL ARTIFACTS , 2007, 0709.2358.

[17]  I. Smail,et al.  The All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) Data Sets , 2006, astro-ph/0607355.

[18]  P. S. Bunclark,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems , 2008 .

[19]  K. Abazajian,et al.  THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2008, 0812.0649.