Age and hearing loss and the use of acoustic cues in fricative categorization.

This study examined the use of fricative noise information and coarticulatory cues for categorization of word-final fricatives [s] and [f] by younger and older Dutch listeners alike. Particularly, the effect of information loss in the higher frequencies on the use of these two cues for fricative categorization was investigated. If information in the higher frequencies is less strongly available, fricative identification may be impaired or listeners may learn to focus more on coarticulatory information. The present study investigates this second possibility. Phonetic categorization results showed that both younger and older Dutch listeners use the primary cue fricative noise and the secondary cue coarticulatory information to distinguish word-final [f] from [s]. Individual hearing sensitivity in the older listeners modified the use of fricative noise information, but did not modify the use of coarticulatory information. When high-frequency information was filtered out from the speech signal, fricative noise could no longer be used by the younger and older adults. Crucially, they also did not learn to rely more on coarticulatory information as a compensatory cue for fricative categorization. This suggests that listeners do not readily show compensatory use of this secondary cue to fricative identity when fricative categorization becomes difficult.

[1]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[2]  E. Owens,et al.  Consonant confusions associated with hearing loss above 2000 Hz. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  D. Whalen Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise with aging among normal hearing listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  F. Zeng,et al.  Recognition of voiceless fricatives by normal and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  S. Nittrouer Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries , 1992 .

[7]  R. N. Ohde,et al.  Effect of relative amplitude of frication on perception of place of articulation. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Richard Lippmann,et al.  Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequency speech energy , 1996, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[9]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds , 1999, Speech Commun..

[10]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E. Gerrits The categorisation of speech sounds by adults and children: a study of the categorical perception hypothesis and thedevelopment weighting of acoustic speech cues , 2001 .

[13]  S. Nittrouer Learning to perceive speech: how fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Influence of hearing loss on the perceptual strategies of children and adults. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  B. Moore,et al.  Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  S. Bacon,et al.  Relative importance of temporal information in various frequency regions for consonant identification in quiet and in noise. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  A. Cutler,et al.  Formant transitions in fricative identification: the role of native fricative inventory. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[19]  A. Jongman,et al.  Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S. Gordon-Salant The aging auditory system , 2010 .

[21]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[22]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Odette Scharenborg,et al.  Hearing Loss and the Use of Acoustic Cues in Phonetic Categorisation of Fricatives , 2012, INTERSPEECH.

[24]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  A. Wagner Cross-language similarities and differences in the uptake of place information. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[27]  Brian B. Monson,et al.  The perceptual significance of high-frequency energy in the human voice , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[28]  A. Weber,et al.  The role of attentional abilities in lexically guided perceptual learning by older listeners , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.