A downlink/uplink identification algorithm for TDD communication systems in cognitive radio content

Cognitive radio has been considered as the most possibly techniques to solve the problems of spectrum underutilization and the spectrum scarcity. To discover the spectrum utilization correctly and quickly, the primary signals are sensed and analyzed by the secondary system with no cooperation from primary system. When the primary system is a communication system, downlink and uplink of the primary system should be distinguished by the cognitive radio since different links have different spectrum access opportunities due to the different transmitters should be sensed and the different receivers should be protected by the secondary system. Thus, the downlink/uplink identification is the first step for secondary access. Especially in TDD communication systems, the link identification meets tough demanding of timing and accuracy. In this paper, we proposed a link identification algorithm for TDD communication systems exploiting the power level features of downlink and uplink. Via the energy detection results of a number of distributed secondary users participating in the identification process, secondary system makes the decision about the current link is downlink or uplink. The effects of the local detection and the coverage of the secondary system on the algorithm performance are also analyzed. The results of the simulation show that, even in the toughest situation where the received downlink signal by SS is the lowest and the received uplink signal is the highest, the proposed algorithm can make the identification with high accuracy in a very short detection time.

[1]  Brian L. Mark,et al.  A Framework for Cognitive WiMAX With Frequency Agility , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[3]  Oriol Sallent,et al.  Positioning-based framework for secondary spectrum usage , 2008, Phys. Commun..

[4]  Brian L. Mark,et al.  Modeling and analysis of interference in Listen‐Before‐Talk spectrum access schemes , 2006, Int. J. Netw. Manag..

[5]  Preston F. Marshall Dynamic Spectrum Access as a Mechanism for Transition to Interference Tolerant Systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[6]  Zhou Xianwei,et al.  Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008 .

[7]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  S.M. Mishra,et al.  Coexistence with Primary Users of Different Scales , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[9]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[10]  H. Urkowitz Energy detection of unknown deterministic signals , 1967 .

[11]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  In-band spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: energy detection or feature detection? , 2008, MobiCom '08.

[12]  C. Cordeiro,et al.  IEEE 802.22: the first worldwide wireless standard based on cognitive radios , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[13]  Robert W. Brodersen,et al.  Detect and avoid: an ultra-wideband/WiMAX coexistence mechanism [Topics in Radio Communications] , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  J. Morris Chang,et al.  WiMax: The Emergence of Wireless Broadband , 2006, IT Professional.