Management 8-1-2015 Assessing Emerging Automotive Technologies for the Future

-A scenario-based multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methodology has been developed and applied for the selection of automotive technology. The present study discusses, what are the problems for the current automotive technologies are, what requirements are outlined in the literatures and government guidelines/publications, considering different aspects of technological needs, public needs, policy measures etc. A set of criteria are developed, which cover multiple perspectives; reflecting the diverse stakeholders in the technology assessment, acquisition and adoption, in this case the government, the general public which includes drivers and pedestrians, automobile manufacturers. Three emerging technologies (Vehicle-to-Vehicle communication, Vehicle-toInfrastructure and Full autonomous) were identified and evaluated based on the mentioned criteria using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), a multi criteria decision tool. Since the technologies are still being developed and some are barely emerging, it is considered appropriate to use speculative values from the publications from industry and other credible sources and consider multiple scenarios each of which could occur. In our case, we considered 9 main scenarios and evaluated the three technology candidates under each of them.

[1]  Milan Zelany,et al.  A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal , 1974, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  J. Graham,et al.  The Effect of Fuel Economy Standards on Automobile Safety , 1989, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[3]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Decision making for technology executives : using multiple perspectives to improved performance , 1999 .

[4]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[5]  Richard L. Daniels,et al.  Integrating product mix and technology adoption decisions: a portfolio approach for evaluating advanced technologies in the automobile industry , 2001 .

[6]  S. Rosenbloom,et al.  AUTOMOBILITY AMONG THE ELDERLY. THE CONVERGENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, MOBILITY AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ISSUES , 2002 .

[7]  M. Hallenbeck,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF RECURRING VERSUS NON-RECURRING CONGESTION , 2003 .

[8]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Subir Biswas,et al.  Vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication protocols for enhancing highway traffic safety , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Keith Redmill,et al.  Systems for Safety and Autonomous Behavior in Cars: The DARPA Grand Challenge Experience , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Claude Laurgeau,et al.  Comparative synthesis of the 3 main European projects dealing with Cooperative Systems (CVIS, SAFESPOT and COOPERS) and description of COOPERS Demonstration Site 4 , 2008, 2008 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  Woong Cho,et al.  Realization of anti-collision warning application using V2V communication , 2009, 2009 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[13]  G. Nemet Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change , 2009 .

[14]  Martin Buss,et al.  Cognition and emotion in autonomous cars , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[15]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  Vehicular communication systems: Enabling technologies, applications, and future outlook on intelligent transportation , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Francesco Paolo Deflorio,et al.  Assessing the effects of inter-vehicle communication systems on road safety , 2009 .

[17]  N Rouphail,et al.  Assessing the impact of V2V / V2I communication systems on traffic congestion and emissions , 2010 .

[18]  Liuqing Yang,et al.  Intelligent transportation spaces: vehicles, traffic, communications, and beyond , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Pascal Lorenz,et al.  Wireless communication technologies for ITS applications [Topics in Automotive Networking] , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  A. T. Eshlaghy,et al.  Supplier Selection by Neo-TOPSIS , 2011 .

[21]  Andrei Furda,et al.  Enabling Safe Autonomous Driving in Real-World City Traffic Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[22]  Subhankar Karmakar,et al.  Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  P. Manzoni,et al.  Automatic Accident Detection: Assistance Through Communication Technologies and Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[24]  Benjamin K. Barton,et al.  The role of automation in reducing stress and negative affect while driving , 2013 .

[25]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers , 2014 .