The physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities: development and evaluation.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the construct validity of a new 13-item physical activity survey designed to assess physical activity in individuals with physical disabilities. DESIGN Mail survey requesting information on physical activity, basic demographic characteristics, self-rated health, and self-rated physical activity. SETTING In February 2000, surveys were sent to 1176 individuals who had used rehabilitative services at a major midwestern university between 1950 and 1999. PARTICIPANTS Two hundred twenty-seven men and 145 women with disabilities responded to the mail survey (80%, spinal cord or other locomotor injuries; 13%, visual and auditory injuries; 7%, other; 92%, white; mean age +/- standard deviation, 49.8 +/- 12.9y; mean length of disability, 36.9 +/- 14.9y). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Physical activity was assessed with the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD). The PASIPD requests the number of days a week and hours daily (categories) of participation in recreational, household, and occupational activities over the past 7 days. Total scores were calculated as the average hours daily times a metabolic equivalent value and summed over items. RESULTS Pearson correlations between each survey item and the total PASIPD score were all statistically significant (P < .05) and >or= .20 (range, .20- .67). Factor analysis with principal component extraction and varimax orthogonal rotations revealed 5 latent factors (eigenvalues >or= 1, factor loadings >or= .40): home repair and lawn and garden, housework, vigorous sport and recreation, light sport and recreation, and occupation and transportation. These 5 factors accounted for 63% of the total variance. Cronbach alpha coefficients ranged from.37 to.65, indicating low-to-moderate internal consistency within factors. Those who reported being "active/highly active" had higher total and subcategory scores compared with those "not active at all." Those in "excellent" health had higher total, vigorous sport and recreation, and occupation and transportation subcategory scores compared with those who rated their health "fair/poor" (all P < .05). CONCLUSION These results provide preliminary support for the construct validity of the PASIPD. Additional validation studies using an external criterion and in more generalizable samples are warranted.

[1]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[2]  C. Caspersen,et al.  A survey for assessing physical activity among older adults. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  A. Folsom,et al.  Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in African American and White Adults , 2000 .

[4]  R. Washburn,et al.  Assessing Physical Activity during Wheelchair Pushing: Validity of a Portable Accelerometer , 1999 .

[5]  E. Jacobs,et al.  Physical activity in relation to colon cancer in middle-aged men and women. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  A. Jette,et al.  The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  B. Psaty,et al.  Leisure-time physical activity and the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  G A Colditz,et al.  A prospective study of recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  J F Sallis,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  J. Manson,et al.  A Prospective Study of Walking as Compared with Vigorous Exercise in the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Women , 2000 .

[11]  A. Manley.  Physical Activity And Health: A Report Of The Surgeon General , 2004 .

[12]  G A Colditz,et al.  Physical activity and risk of stroke in women. , 2000, JAMA.

[13]  R S Paffenbarger,et al.  Associations of light, moderate, and vigorous intensity physical activity with longevity. The Harvard Alumni Health Study. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  C A Anson,et al.  Incidence of secondary complications in spinal cord injury , 1996, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[15]  R. Paffenbarger,et al.  Physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk in middle-aged and older women. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  J. Rimmer,et al.  Research on physical activity and disability: an emerging national priority. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  A. Folsom,et al.  Physical activity and ischemic stroke risk. The atherosclerosis risk in communities study. , 1999, Stroke.

[18]  Catherine Ratzin Jackson,et al.  ACSM Position Stand: Osteoporosis and Exercise , 2000 .

[19]  Y. J. Gist.  International Brief Mortality and Health by Kevin Kinsella and , 1998 .

[20]  K. Westerterp,et al.  Validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): according to energy expenditure assessed by the doubly labeled water method. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  H A Hogan,et al.  Mechanical loading attenuates bone loss due to immobilization and calcium deficiency. , 1999, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  A. Folsom,et al.  Incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American and white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. , 2000, JAMA.

[23]  T. Lakka,et al.  Moderately intense physical activities and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness reduce the risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in middle-aged men. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Secondary conditions following spinal cord injury in a population-based sample , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[25]  L. Crocker,et al.  Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory , 1986 .

[26]  S. Oparil,et al.  Physical activity and cardiovascular health , 1996 .

[27]  Steven N. Blair,et al.  Influences of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Other Precursors on Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality in Men and Women , 1996 .

[28]  G. Thorgeirsson,et al.  Effects of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Ventilatory Function on Risk for Stroke in Men: The Reykjavk Study , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  C. Burchfiel,et al.  Physical activity in older middle-aged men and reduced risk of stroke: the Honolulu Heart Program. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  J. Sallis,et al.  Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  J. Hd..  Americans with Disabilities 1991-1992 , 1994 .

[32]  Washburn Ra,et al.  Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) : the relationship with activity measured by a portable accelerometer , 1999 .

[33]  R A Boileau,et al.  The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): evidence for validity. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  C. Milgrom,et al.  In-vivo strain measurements to evaluate the strengthening potential of exercises on the tibial bone. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  K. Yano,et al.  Physical activity and incidence of diabetes: the Honolulu Heart Program. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[36]  K. V. D. Kooy,et al.  Physical activity and breast cancer risk in women aged 20-54 years. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  I. Piña,et al.  Statement on exercise. Benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans. A statement for health professionals by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart association. , 1992, Circulation.