An adaptive MR-CT registration method for MRI-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy

Magnetic Resonance images (MRI) have superior soft tissue contrast compared with CT images. Therefore, MRI might be a better imaging modality to differentiate the prostate from surrounding normal organs. Methods to accurately register MRI to simulation CT images are essential, as we transition the use of MRI into the routine clinic setting. In this study, we present a finite element method (FEM) to improve the performance of a commercially available, B-spline-based registration algorithm in the prostate region. Specifically, prostate contours were delineated independently on ten MRI and CT images using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Each pair of MRI and CT images was registered with the B-spline-based algorithm implemented in the VelocityAI system. A bounding box that contains the prostate volume in the CT image was selected and partitioned into a tetrahedral mesh. An adaptive finite element method was then developed to adjust the displacement vector fields (DVFs) of the B-spline-based registrations within the box. The B-spline and FEM-based registrations were evaluated based on the variations of prostate volume and tumor centroid, the unbalanced energy of the generated DVFs, and the clarity of the reconstructed anatomical structures. The results showed that the volumes of the prostate contours warped with the B-spline-based DVFs changed 10.2% on average, relative to the volumes of the prostate contours on the original MR images. This discrepancy was reduced to 1.5% for the FEM-based DVFs. The average unbalanced energy was 2.65 and 0.38 mJ cm(-3), and the prostate centroid deviation was 0.37 and 0.28 cm, for the B-spline and FEM-based registrations, respectively. Different from the B-spline-warped MR images, the FEM-warped MR images have clear boundaries between prostates and bladders, and their internal prostatic structures are consistent with those of the original MR images. In summary, the developed adaptive FEM method preserves the prostate volume during the transformation between the MR and CT images and improves the accuracy of the B-spline registrations in the prostate region. The approach will be valuable for the development of high-quality MRI-guided radiation therapy.

[1]  D Thwaites,et al.  An evaluation of four CT-MRI co-registration techniques for radiotherapy treatment planning of prone rectal cancer patients. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  D. Gladstone,et al.  Prostate seed implant quality assessment using MR and CT image fusion. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  A. Tarakanova,et al.  Molecular modeling of protein materials: case study of elastin , 2013 .

[4]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  G L Sannazzari,et al.  CT-MRI image fusion for delineation of volumes in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[7]  Lei Xing,et al.  Image registration with auto-mapped control volumes , 2006 .

[8]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  Monte Carlo dose mapping on deforming anatomy , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  A. Sarvazyan,et al.  Development of mechanical models of breast and prostate with palpable nodules , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[11]  I. Chetty,et al.  A novel approach for establishing benchmark CBCT/CT deformable image registrations in prostate cancer radiotherapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  L. Østergaard,et al.  MR-CT registration using a Ni-Ti prostate stent in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  Deming Wang,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  David M. Doddrell,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Lei Xing,et al.  Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy planning: Investigation of dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based dose planning. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Large-deformation image registration using fluid landmarks , 2000, 4th IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[21]  Kazuhiro Ohtakara,et al.  Usefulness of CT-MRI fusion in radiotherapy planning for localized prostate cancer. , 2011, Journal of radiation research.

[22]  Filip Claus,et al.  Interobserver Delineation Variation Using CT versus Combined CT + MRI in Intensity–Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer , 2005, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[23]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Shunshan Li,et al.  Voxel-based statistical analysis of uncertainties associated with deformable image registration. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  B. Daniel,et al.  Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study. , 2004, Medical physics.

[26]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  A finite element method to correct deformable image registration errors in low-contrast regions , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  A. Khotanzad,et al.  A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  A real time finite element based tissue simulation method incorporating nonlinear elastic behavior , 2005, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.