论文信息 - Leading North American Programs in Clinical Assessment Research: An Assessment of Productivity and Impact

Leading North American Programs in Clinical Assessment Research: An Assessment of Productivity and Impact

To identify doctoral programs with strong concentrations in clinical assessment, I measured productivity and impact of faculty at North American institutions with American Psychological Association accredited clinical programs. Publications, citations, and h-indexes derived from 4 top assessment journals were calculated over a 10-year period (1999–2009). I identified a total of 42 leading programs that collectively accounted for more than half of the publications and citations in these journals. I found a moderate relationship between assessment productivity and both US News & World Report program rankings as well as general productivity rankings of clinical programs reported in an earlier study.

L. Morey

[1] J. Thayer,et al. Problematic Methods in the Assessment of Scholarly Productivity in Clinical PhD Programs , 2008 .

[2] Michael C. Roberts,et al. Scholarly Productivity in Clinical Psychology PhD Programs: A Normative Assessment of Publication Rates , 2007 .

[3] M. Heesacker,et al. My Dog's Better Than Your Dog: Publication Counts and Quality of Clinical Psychology PhD Training , 2007 .

[4] Marjori Matzke,et al. F1000Prime recommendation of An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. , 2005 .

[5] J. Matson,et al. Clinical psychology Ph.D. program rankings: evaluating eminence on faculty publications and citations. , 2005, Research in Developmental Disabilities.

[6] Michael J. Zickar,et al. The Top I-O Psychology Doctoral Programs of North America , 2002 .