A numerical study of cutting bubbles with a wire mesh

Abstract Gas-liquid-solid flows are frequently encountered in chemical, petrochemical and biochemical industries. To overcome the heat and mass transfer limitations in trickle bed reactors and bubble slurry columns, respectively, a micro-structured bubble column (MSBC) can serve as an attractive alternative. In a MSBC, wire meshes are introduced to cut the bubbles in smaller bubbles and enhance the surface renewal (and hence gas-liquid mass transfer) rates, by deformation of the bubbles. Earlier (Jain et al., 2013) modeling efforts using the Euler-Lagrange approach to simulate a micro-structured bubble column employed a bubble cutting closure based on purely geometrical considerations. To improve on this ad hoc procedure in this paper we explore the possibilities of Direct Numerical Simulations to gain more insight in this complex phenomenon with the ultimate aim to develop improved closures. A combined Volume of Fluid-Immersed Boundary method was applied to simulate the interactions between bubbles and wire meshes. When the bubbles are aligned with the opening of the wire mesh, cutting of the bubbles is not observed in our simulations, while cutting was expected based solely on geometrical considerations. When the Eotvos number, Eo , is larger than 4, the bubbles are highly deformable and squeeze themselves through the opening of the wire mesh. In addition, the bubble gets stuck underneath the mesh when the bubbles are small ( Eo ⩽ 4 ) and/or the opening is in the wire mesh is small. Almost all bubbles that hit the intersection of two crossing wires get stuck underneath the mesh, except for large bubbles ( Eo = 15 ), which get cut by the mesh. Based on these results, it is concluded that the cutting of bubbles depends on the Eotvos number, the opening of the wire mesh and geometrical considerations. However, the results also seem to indicate that the diameter of the wire mesh will also influence the cutting behavior.

[1]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Multi-scale modeling of dispersed gas-liquid two-phase flow , 2004 .

[2]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  DNS of gas bubbles behaviour using an improved 3D front tracking model—Model development , 2010 .

[3]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  3-D Direct Numerical Simulation of Gas–Liquid and Gas–Liquid–Solid Flow Systems Using the Level-Set and Immersed-Boundary Methods , 2006 .

[4]  Matthew W. Williams,et al.  A balanced-force algorithm for continuous and sharp interfacial surface tension models within a volume tracking framework , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  H. Prasser,et al.  Bubble size measurement using wire-mesh sensors , 2001 .

[6]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Cutting bubbles with a single wire , 2017 .

[7]  M. Renardy,et al.  PROST: a parabolic reconstruction of surface tension for the volume-of-fluid method , 2002 .

[8]  Albert Renken,et al.  Bubble columns staged with structured fibrous catalytic layers: Residence time distribution and mass transfer , 2001 .

[9]  Stefan Heinrich,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of particle impact on thin liquid films using a combined volume of fluid and immersed boundary method , 2012 .

[10]  Deepak D Jain,et al.  Discrete bubble modeling for a micro-structured bubble column , 2013 .

[11]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  A critical comparison of surface tension models for the volume of fluid method , 2014 .

[12]  Hiroshige Kikura,et al.  Uncertainty and intrusiveness of three-layer wire-mesh sensor , 2011 .

[13]  M. W. Baltussen,et al.  Bubbles on the cutting edge : direct numerical simulations of gas-liquid-solid three-phase flows , 2013 .

[14]  Yong Li,et al.  Numerical studies of bubble formation dynamics in gas-liquid-solid fluidization at high pressures , 2001 .

[15]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of complex multi-fluid flows using a combined front tracking and immersed boundary method , 2009 .

[16]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer in dense fluid-particle systems , 2012 .

[17]  D. Durran.  Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics , 2010 .