Design-for-variety and operational performance

Design-for-variety (DFV) practices aim to help manufacturers to manage and mitigate the negative impact of product variety on operational performance. Theory suggests that designing products according to DFV practices increases operational performance by allowing more efficient processing of products, capitalizing on commonalities and by supporting cross-functional and cross-boundary coordination through simplifying product designs. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the latter proposition, and especially the mediating role of internal, supplier and customer integration in the relationship between DFV and operational performance.,Data collected in 2014 among 702 manufacturers from 22 countries as part of the 6th International Manufacturing Strategy Survey are analyzed through mediated regression analysis using SPSS 25, AMOS and PROCESS v3.1 software.,DFV affects cost/speed, quality, delivery, flexibility and service performance positively. Except for the role of customer integration in the DFV-cost/speed relationship, internal, supplier and customer integration partially mediate the relationship between DFV and operational performance.,In addition to allowing a more efficient processing of products, the positive effect of DFV on performance is also explained by the fact that DFV practices support cross-functional and supply chain integration. These practices allow manufacturers to create a set of design rules easily understood and communicated within and across organizational boundaries.,While previous research tends to consider one DFV practice and limited sets of integration mechanisms and performance dimensions, this paper consolidates the most common DFV practices into one construct and encompasses the three forms of integration and six performance dimensions dominating the DFV literature.

[1]  Roberto Filippini,et al.  Direct and mediated effects of product modularity on development time and product performance , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology.

[2]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study , 2012 .

[3]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Design for manufacture and design for `X`: concepts, applications, and perspectives , 2001 .

[4]  C. Lengnick-Hall.  Customer Contributions to Quality: A Different View of the Customer-Oriented Firm , 1996 .

[5]  Desirée Knoppen,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of measurement equivalence in operations management , 2015 .

[6]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  Interplant coordination, supply chain integration, and operational performance of a plant in a manufacturing network: a mediation analysis , 2016 .

[7]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[8]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[9]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  A Contingency-Based Approach to the Use of Product Platforms and Modules in New Product Development , 2014 .

[10]  Roberto Filippini,et al.  Modularity and the impact on new product development time performance: Investigating the moderating effects of supplier involvement and interfunctional integration , 2010 .

[11]  Richard C. M. Yam,et al.  A case study of product modularization on supply chain design and coordination in Hong Kong and China , 2005 .

[12]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Supply chain information flow strategies: an empirical taxonomy , 2009 .

[13]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[14]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[15]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[16]  R. Willig,et al.  Economies of scope , 1981 .

[17]  Antonio K. W. Lau,et al.  Supply chain product co-development, product modularity and product performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong manufacturers , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[18]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2004 .

[19]  Richard C.M. Yam,et al.  Supply chain integration and product modularity: An empirical study of product performance for selected Hong Kong manufacturing industries , 2010 .

[20]  Shuiyin Zhou,et al.  Product modularity and supply chain collaboration: An empirical study of firm performance for 221 Chinese manufacturing industries , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology.

[21]  Teck-Yong Eng,et al.  Product variety strategy for improving new product development proficiencies , 2005 .

[22]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Developing supplier integration capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: A dynamic capabilities approach , 2014 .

[23]  H. Maylor.  Concurrent new product development: an empirical assessment , 1997 .

[24]  Cristina Gimenez,et al.  Sustainable supplier development practices: Drivers and enablers in a global context , 2015 .

[25]  Yanan Feng,et al.  Rethinking the ‘Mirroring’ Hypothesis: Implications for Technological Modularity, Tacit Coordination, and Radical Innovation , 2017 .

[26]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Modularity, product variety, production volume and component sourcing: Theorizing beyond generic prescriptions , 2002 .

[28]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[29]  K. W. Lau Antonio,et al.  The impacts of product modularity on competitive capabilities and performance: An empirical study , 2007 .

[30]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Application support to product variety management , 2008 .

[31]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[32]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Avoid the Pitfalls in Supplier Development , 2000 .

[33]  Ellinger Alexander Enrique.  The relationship between marketing/logistics interdepartmental integration and performance in U.S. manufacturing firms : an empirical study , 1997 .

[34]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The relationship among modularity, functional coordination, and mass customization: Implications for competitiveness , 2010 .

[35]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Suppliers Integration and NPD Outcomes: Conditional Moderation Effects of Modular Design Competence , 2013 .

[36]  P. Cardona,et al.  Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry , 2002 .

[37]  H. Boer,et al.  Supply chain integration, risk management and manufacturing flexibility , 2018 .

[38]  R. Westbrook.  Action research: a new paradigm for research in production andoperations management , 1995 .

[39]  Qiang Tu,et al.  Measuring Modularity-Based Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Mass Customization Capability: A Customer-Driven Perspective , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[40]  Ronaldo Parente,et al.  The effect of supply chain integration, modular production, and cultural distance on new product development: A dynamic capabilities approach , 2011 .

[41]  K. L. Edwards,et al.  Towards more strategic product design for manufacture and assembly: priorities for concurrent engineering , 2002 .

[42]  Stephen Michael Disney,et al.  The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains , 2003 .

[43]  Mohamed A. Youssef.  Design for manufacturability and time‐to‐market , 1995 .

[44]  K. W. Lau Antonio,et al.  The complementarity of internal integration and product modularity: An empirical study of their interaction effect on competitive capabilities , 2009 .

[45]  Henrike Engele Elisabeth Boer.  Product modularity and its effects on the manufacturing firm: A contingency perspective , 2016 .

[46]  Qiang Tu,et al.  The Role of modularity and integration in enhancing manufacturing performance: An absorptive capacity perspective , 2010 .

[47]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  New Directions in Design for Manufacturing , 2004 .

[48]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  A critical evaluation of alternative methods and paradigms for conducting mediation analysis in operations management research , 2014 .

[49]  I. C. Wright,et al.  The Utilization of Product Development Methods: A Survey of UK Industry , 1996 .

[50]  J. Hallikas,et al.  Risk management processes in supplier networks , 2004 .

[51]  Min Zhang,et al.  The effects of organizational flatness, coordination, and product modularity on mass customization capability , 2014 .

[52]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Theorizing, testing, and concluding for mediation in SCM research: Tutorial and procedural recommendations , 2014 .

[53]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  The scientific theory‐building process: a primer using the case of TQM , 1998 .

[54]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[55]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Product and Process Modularity's Effects on Manufacturing Agility and Firm Growth Performance , 2011 .

[56]  Geoffrey Boothroyd,et al.  Product design for manufacture and assembly , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[57]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Managing Differentiation-Integration Duality in Supply Chain Integration , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[58]  Ellen Thomas,et al.  Platform-based product design and environmental turbulence , 2014 .

[59]  Cristina Gimenez,et al.  Logistics‐production, logistics‐marketing and external integration , 2013 .

[60]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[61]  B. Tabrizi,et al.  Defining next-generation products: an inside look. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[62]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  The effects of product modularity on competitive performance: Do integration strategies mediate the relationship? , 2007 .

[63]  R. Handfield,et al.  Just‐in‐time and logistics in global sourcing: an empirical study , 1997 .

[64]  Richard C.M. Yam,et al.  The Impact of Product Modularity on New Product Performance: Mediation by Product Innovativeness , 2011 .

[65]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  The effects of product modularity on launch speed , 2015 .

[66]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[67]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[68]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[69]  Ruggero Golini,et al.  Threats of Sourcing Locally Without a Strategic Approach: Impacts on Lead Time Performances , 2009 .

[70]  Brian Squire,et al.  Modularization and the impact on supply relationships , 2007 .

[71]  G. Boothroyd.  Design for assembly—The key to design for manufacture , 1987 .

[72]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Product development practices, manufacturing practices, and performance: A mediational perspective , 2014 .

[73]  George Q. Huang,et al.  A survey report on design for manufacture in the UK furniture manufacturing industry , 1998 .

[74]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[75]  Michael J. Braunscheidel,et al.  The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response , 2009 .

[76]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Fundamentals of Product Modularity , 1994 .

[77]  Cristina Giménez Thomsen,et al.  Logistics-Production, Logistics-Marketing and External Integration: Their Impact on Performance , 2003 .

[78]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Applications of Empirical Science in Manufacturing and Service Operations , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[79]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Platform driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice , 2001 .

[80]  Alain Bernard,et al.  Product Variety Management , 1998 .