Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hilde Bosmans | Chantal Van Ongeval | Guy Marchal | Herman Pauwels | Federica Zanca | Jurgen Jacobs | Filip Claus | Valerie Celis | Catherine Geniets | Veerle Provost
[1] R. Swensson. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. , 1996, Medical physics.
[2] Stephen L Hillis,et al. Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. , 2008, Academic radiology.
[3] Donglin Zeng,et al. The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance. , 2005, Academic radiology.
[4] R. Bird,et al. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.
[5] John F. Hamilton,et al. A Free Response Approach To The Measurement And Characterization Of Radiographic Observer Performance , 1977, Other Conferences.
[6] Hilde Bosmans,et al. An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 2008, Medical physics.
[7] C. D'Orsi,et al. Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.
[8] Ehsan Samei,et al. Simulation of mammographic lesions. , 2006, Academic radiology.
[9] D. Blanc,et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images , 1998 .
[10] M J Schell,et al. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[11] L. Bassett,et al. Mammography and breast cancer screening. , 1990, The Surgical clinics of North America.
[12] Stephen L Hillis,et al. Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method. , 2004, Academic radiology.
[13] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I. , 2006, Medical physics.
[14] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[15] Arthur E. Burgess,et al. Producing lesions for hybrid mammograms: extracted tumors and simulated microcalcifications , 1999, Medical Imaging.
[16] N. Obuchowski,et al. Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[17] Bradley M. Hemminger,et al. The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.
[18] K. Muller,et al. Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques. , 2001, Academic radiology.
[19] K. Berbaum,et al. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.
[20] N. Obuchowski,et al. Hypothesis testing of diagnostic accuracy for multiple readers and multiple tests: An anova approach with dependent observations , 1995 .
[21] N A Obuchowski,et al. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs. , 1995, Academic radiology.
[22] Robert M. Nishikawa,et al. Radiologists’ Preferences for Digital Mammographic Display , 2000 .
[23] Dev P Chakraborty,et al. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. , 2008, Academic radiology.
[24] Dev P Chakraborty,et al. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.
[25] Constantine A Gatsonis,et al. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. , 2005, Radiology.
[26] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. , 2003, Radiology.
[27] D. Ikeda,et al. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.
[28] N Karssemeijer,et al. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. , 1998, Radiology.
[29] Nancy A Obuchowski,et al. A comparison of the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz and Obuchowski–Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data , 2005, Statistics in medicine.
[30] Bradley M. Hemminger,et al. Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms? , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.
[31] L. Solin,et al. Twenty-year incidence and patterns of contralateral breast cancer after breast conservation treatment with radiation. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[32] Ann-Katherine Carton,et al. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms. , 2004, Medical physics.