Measuring household energy efficiency behaviors with attention to behavioral plasticity in the United States

Abstract Household energy consumption remains ripe for behavioral intervention, being responsible for an estimated 31% of U.S. CO 2 emissions. As researchers attempt to understand the factors that influence household energy efficiency behaviors, we suggest it is important to attend to behavioral plasticity—how the perceived difficulty of behavioral responses varies across individuals, behaviors, and contexts. We present a new instrument composed of behaviors identified in previous analyses as having the highest impact on residential energy consumption. Our instrument allows for the specific measurement of self-reported behaviors, behavioral intentions, and inability to perform behaviors. Results from a convenience sample of 1522 U.S. adults demonstrate the construct validity of this instrument, as key factors known to influence pro-environmental behaviors—e.g., key environmental beliefs and attitudes—predict household energy efficiency behaviors.

[1]  A. McCright,et al.  A behavioural measure of environmental decision-making for social surveys , 2015 .

[2]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[3]  A. McCright,et al.  Comparing Two Measures of Social Movement Identity: The Environmental Movement as an Example , 2015 .

[4]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[6]  Robert Gifford,et al.  Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions , 2011 .

[7]  L. Steg,et al.  An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals , 2014 .

[8]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[9]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[10]  A. McCright,et al.  An Examination of the “Greening of Christianity” Thesis Among Americans, 1993–2010 , 2014 .

[11]  E. Shove.  Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[12]  Aaron Johnson,et al.  Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors , 2004 .

[13]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bridging Environmental Science with Environmental Policy: Plasticity of Population, Affluence, and Technology , 2002 .

[14]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  US climate policy needs behavioural science , 2015 .

[15]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? , 2000 .

[16]  Shahzeen Z Attari,et al.  Perceptions of water use , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[18]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change , 1999 .

[19]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Design principles for carbon emissions reduction programs. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  P. Stern.  New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[21]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  'Going green'?: The limitations of behaviour change programmes as a policy response to escalating resource consumption , 2014 .

[22]  S. Embretson,et al.  Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .

[23]  A. McCright,et al.  A Test of the Biographical Availability Argument for Gender Differences in Environmental Behaviors , 2014 .

[24]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[25]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[27]  A. McCright,et al.  Bringing ideology in: the conservative white male effect on worry about environmental problems in the USA , 2013 .

[28]  A. McCright,et al.  Green Christians? An Empirical Examination of Environmental Concern Within the U.S. General Public , 2014 .

[29]  D. Guber.  Environmental concern and the dimensionality problem : A new approach to an old predicament , 1996 .

[30]  J. Freese,et al.  Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample , 2014 .

[31]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  The influence of political ideology on trust in science , 2013, Environmental Research Letters.

[33]  R. Dunlap.  The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use , 2008 .

[34]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Validating a Comprehensive Model of Environmental Concern Cross‐Nationally: A U.S.‐Canadian Comparison* , 2007 .

[35]  Jesse J. Chandler,et al.  Inside the Turk , 2014 .