Estimation of sex from the metric assessment of digital hand radiographs in a Western Australian population.

The forensic anthropologist is responsible for contributing to the identification of an unknown by constructing a biological profile from their skeletal remains. Towards achieving this goal, anthropologists can apply population and temporally specific standards with known error margins to morphometric data collected from a decedent. Recent research relating to the formulation of sex estimation standards has focussed on the assessment of bones other than the traditionally favoured pelvis and cranium, such as long bones of the appendicular skeleton. In particular, sex estimation standards based on morphometric data from metacarpals and phalanges have reported classification accuracy rates of 80% (and above) based on a narrow range of populations. The purpose of this study is to provide population-specific hand bone sex-estimation standards for a contemporary Western Australian population. The present study examines digital right hand radiographs of 300 adults of known age, equally represented by sex. A total of 40 measurements were taken in each hand (metacarpals and proximal phalanges); the measurements were then analysed using univariate statistics and cross-validated direct and stepwise discriminant function analysis. All hand bone measurements were significantly sexually dimorphic, with a tendency for the width measurements to express a higher degree of dimorphism than the length measurements. A maximum cross-validated classification accuracy of 91% was achieved with a sex bias of -6%. The standards presented here can be used in future forensic investigations that require sex estimation of hand bones in a Western Australian population.

[1]  John Goodfellow,et al.  Scientific foundations of orthopaedics and traumatology , 1980 .

[2]  Douglas H. Ubelaker,et al.  Handbook of Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology , 2016 .

[3]  Daniel Franklin,et al.  Forensic age estimation in human skeletal remains: current concepts and future directions. , 2010, Legal medicine.

[4]  J L Scheuer,et al.  Sex determination from metacarpals and the first proximal phalanx. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  John Albanese,et al.  A Metric Method for Sex Determination Using the Proximal Femur and Fragmentary Hipbone *,† , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  T W Phenice,et al.  A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  S. Asala,et al.  Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary femur of South African blacks. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[8]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Mechanical factors in bone growth and development. , 1996, Bone.

[9]  A. Cardini,et al.  Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population , 2014, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[10]  L. Scheuer Application of osteology to forensic medicine , 2002, Clinical anatomy.

[11]  Maha A. Hilal,et al.  Determination of sex from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in Upper Egyptians , 2011 .

[12]  W. Mueller,et al.  Reliability, dependability, and precision of anthropometric measurements. The Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1976-1980. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  C. Wilczak Consideration of sexual dimorphism, age, and asymmetry in quantitative measurements of muscle insertion sites , 1998 .

[14]  M Katherine Spradley,et al.  Sex Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Skull Versus Postcranial Elements , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  C. Mascie-taylor,et al.  Precision of measurement as a component of human variation. , 2007, Journal of physiological anthropology.

[16]  E. Giles,et al.  Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. , 1963, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  Daniel Franklin,et al.  Estimation of sex from sternal measurements in a Western Australian population. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[18]  G. Trancho,et al.  Metacarpal Sexual Determination in a Spanish Population , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[20]  Population variation in second metacarpal sexual size dimorphism. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[21]  C. Ruff,et al.  Postcranial robusticity in Homo. II: Humeral bilateral asymmetry and bone plasticity. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  Cristina Cattaneo,et al.  Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[23]  D. Franklin,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. , 2005, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[24]  N. Lovell,et al.  Test of Phenice's technique for determining sex from the os pubis. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  Douglas H Ubelaker,et al.  A test of the phenice method for the estimation of sex. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[26]  J. Albanese,et al.  Universal methodology for developing univariate sample-specific sex determination methods: an example using the epicondylar breadth of the humerus , 2005 .

[27]  M. Šlaus,et al.  Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary and complete tibiae from medieval Croatian sites. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[28]  C. Eliopoulos,et al.  Sex determination using metacarpal biometric data from the Athens Collection. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[29]  D H Ubelaker,et al.  Sex estimation from the metatarsals. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[30]  R. Janaway,et al.  Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science , 1987 .

[31]  Stephen D Ousley,et al.  New perspectives in forensic anthropology. , 2008, American journal of physical anthropology.

[32]  Daniel Franklin,et al.  The application of traditional and geometric morphometric analyses for forensic quantification of sexual dimorphism: preliminary investigations in a Western Australian population , 2012, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[33]  M Steyn,et al.  Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[34]  V Page Zanella,et al.  Testing the validity of metacarpal use in sex assessment of human skeletal remains. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[35]  Mubarak Ariyo Bidmos,et al.  An assessment of the accuracy of discriminant function equations for sex determination of the femur and tibia from a South African population. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[36]  D. Kerr,et al.  Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status , 1999, British Journal of Nutrition.

[37]  J V Taylor,et al.  Sex assessment of the femur: a test of a new method. , 1979, American journal of physical anthropology.

[38]  Ann H Ross,et al.  Sex Determination from Hand and Foot Bone Lengths * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[39]  Daniel Franklin,et al.  Estimation of stature from hand and handprint dimensions in a Western Australian population. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[40]  Mubarak Ariyo Bidmos,et al.  The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations. , 2009, Forensic science international.