Audience research and social media data : opportunities and challenges

The widespread adoption of social media platforms and other information and communication technology innovations not only pose new challenges for audience researchers but also provide exciting opportunities to re-invigorate audience research as an academic topic as well as a practical pursuit. In this paper, we outline some general methodological issues that arise when seeking to exploit these opportunities, drawing on our experiences of using Twitter as a resource for measuring audience engagement with the BBC World Service (BBCWS) in the context of global media events, specifically the London Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2012 and the Sochi Winter Olympic Games in 2014. We conclude by arguing that social media are not simply a new source of data about audiences but a new forum for unprecedented interaction and collaboration with the audience and, in this respect, they are phenomena to be studied in their own right.

[1]  W. Foddy.  Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in Social Research , 1993 .

[2]  W. Dutton.  The Fifth Estate Emerging through the Network of Networks , 2008 .

[3]  B. D. Waal.  The people formerly known as the audience , 2008 .

[4]  Andrew Hoskins,et al.  Death of a single medium , 2013 .

[5]  A. Hermida.  #JOURNALISM: Reconfiguring journalism research about Twitter, one tweet at a time , 2013 .

[6]  Jennifer Mason.  Six Strategies for Mixing Methods and Linking Data in Social Science Research , 2006 .

[7]  Hugh Mackay,et al.  Special issue editorial: Designs & devices: towards a genealogy of audience research methods at the BBC World Service, 1932-2011 , 2011 .

[8]  Roger Burrows,et al.  After the crisis? Big Data and the methodological challenges of empirical sociology , 2014 .

[9]  Alban Webb.  A leap of imagination: BBC audience research over the iron curtain , 2011 .

[10]  Dan Gillmor,et al.  We the media - grassroots journalism by the people, for the people , 2006 .

[11]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sentiment in Twitter events , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Alban Webb.  An Uncertain Future for the BBC World Service , 2014 .

[13]  George R. Franke,et al.  HANDBOOK OF MIXED METHODS IN SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (Book) , 2004 .

[14]  Alex Voss,et al.  Understanding the Changing Cultural Value of the BBC World Service and the British Council , 2014 .

[15]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[16]  Mike Savage,et al.  The ‘Social Life of Methods’: A Critical Introduction , 2013 .

[17]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Where in the World Are You? Geolocation and Language Identification in Twitter* , 2013, ArXiv.

[18]  R. Ziegler,et al.  Introduction and Overview , 2004, Complementary Medicine Research.

[19]  D. Ruths,et al.  Social media for large studies of behavior , 2014, Science.

[20]  N. Newman,et al.  Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019 , 2019 .

[21]  Joseph Murphy.  Survey methods: Challenges and opportunities , 2015 .

[22]  Peter Burnap,et al.  Policing cyber-neighbourhoods: tension monitoring and social media networks , 2013 .

[23]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[24]  Mark Elliot,et al.  Exploiting New Sources of Data , 2015 .

[25]  N. Newman.  Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social media , 2011 .

[26]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[27]  Philip M. Napoli.  Audience Evolution and the Future of Audience Research , 2012 .

[28]  Roger Burrows,et al.  The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology , 2007, Sociology.

[29]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Production, Consumption, Prosumption , 2010 .

[30]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Quantitative Approaches to Comparing Communication Patterns on Twitter , 2012 .

[31]  三嶋 博之.  The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[32]  William H. Dutton,et al.  Social Media in the Changing Ecology of News: The Fourth and Fifth Estate in Britain , 2012 .

[33]  Derek J. Pike,et al.  Empirical Model‐building and Response Surfaces. , 1988 .

[34]  Toffler Alvin.  The third wave. 1st ed. , 1980 .

[35]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[36]  M. Williams,et al.  Big and broad social data and the sociological imagination: A collaborative response , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[37]  Hugh Mackay,et al.  Interactivity, the global conversation and World Service research: Digital China , 2011 .

[38]  Ning Wang,et al.  Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[39]  Graham Mytton.  Audience research at the BBC World Service 1932-2010 , 2011 .

[40]  Huan Liu,et al.  Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose , 2013, ICWSM.

[41]  Nathaniel T. Kacz.  Review: Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[42]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[43]  Jignesh M. Patel,et al.  Big data and its technical challenges , 2014, CACM.

[44]  R. Procter,et al.  Reading the riots on Twitter: methodological innovation for the analysis of big data , 2013 .

[45]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Twitter data: What do they represent? , 2014, it Inf. Technol..